http://www.prisonplanet.com/fdny-lieu ... n-to-take-down-wtc-7.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KQA1KOKrPc&eurl=

Newly uncovered video from 9/11 featuring an interview with FDNY lieutenant David Rastuccio on MSNBC confirms that there was a plan to deliberately demolish WTC Building 7, as was originally indicated in Larry Silverstein’s infamous statement on the PBS documentary, America Rebuilds.

In the clip, Rastuccio responds to the host’s statement that “You guys knew this was coming all day,” by stating, “We had first reports that the building was unstable and that it was best for it to come down on its own or it would be taken down, I would imagine that it came down on its own.”

Though Rastuccio expresses his opinion that the building had collapsed without the aid of explosives, he admits that a plan had been in place to deliberately demolish the structure.

This reinforces the fact that when Larry Silverstein infamously told a 2002 PBS documentary that a consideration had been made to “pull it,” which is a demolition industry term for deliberate implosion, he did indeed mean that WTC 7 was considered for deliberate demolition.

This would mean that Silverstein’s later qualification of his comments, that “pull it” simply meant to pull the firefighters out of the building, despite FEMA’s assertion that no firefighting operations even took place inside WTC 7, was an outright lie intended to deflect possible ramifications arising out of the $7 billion dollar payout Silverstein received in insurance after the WTC complex was destroyed.

Numerous other eyewitnesses have come forward to express their conviction that WTC 7 was deliberately demolished.

Emergency Medical Technician Indira Singh described to a radio show how she learned that WTC 7 was going to be “brought down” and the context was clear that it was to be deliberately demolished.

“After midday on 9/11 we had to evacuate that because they told us Building 7 was coming down. If you had been there, not being able to see very much just flames everywhere and smoke - it is entirely possible - I do believe that they brought Building 7 down because I heard that they were going to bring it down because it was unstable because of the collateral damage,” said Singh.

Former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue expert Kevin McPadden also reported his conviction that a countdown preceded the collapse of the building.

“While we were on the right side, there was firefighters getting ready, they were bussing them back and forth, and a couple of vets that were there - they got the vibe that something was coming down,” said McPadden.

“We started asking questions, everybody started asking questions, and the next thing you know there was a Red Cross representative pacing back and forth in front of the crowd holding his hand over the radio - I couldn’t hear what it was saying but it was like pulsed - whatever the speech was on there it was pulsed - and that means to me most likely it was a countdown.”

“But he took his hand off at the last three seconds and he gave this heartfelt look - like just run for your life - because he didn’t want to bring it on his conscience - he didn’t want to go to his grave with that - and then we had a couple of seconds to put our heads together,” said McPadden.

Former NYPD officer Craig Bartmer also reported hearing bombs tear down WTC 7 as he ran away from its collapse.

Several TV news networks received advance knowledge that the building was likely to collapse, with both the BBC and CNN reporting at least 26 minutes in advance that the building had already collapsed when it still stood.

Rastuccio’s newly uncovered comments about a plan to demolish Building 7 are likely to provoke a firestorm of fresh suspicion surrounding the implosion of the structurally reinforced 47-story skyscraper, which collapsed in 7 seconds within its own footprint despite suffering relatively minor damage from the collapse of the twin towers.

folk har redan börjat säga att "att dom prata om att ta ner byggnaden om den inte kollapsa av sig själv betyder inte att det fanns en plan att ta ner den"

Snacka om mind control. Om du pratar om att göra något som att "vi får ta ner byggnaden om den inte kommer ner själv" då betyder det att man har en plan att ta ner den om den inte kommer ner själv.

Självklart var det brandmännen på platsen som fick reda på att det fanns en plan och inte dom själva som kom med planen, OEM folket sprang ifrån deras kommandocentral där dom borde varit och ringde deras folk och sa att byggnaderna skulle kollapsa när det inte fanns några som helst tecken på att dom skulle göra det och ingen som trodde det utöver giuliani OEM. som sedan såg till så att viktigt bevis, stålet blev bort skickat och förstört fort.

Att de ska vara så svårt och sätta ihopa 1+1

"it's blowin' boy"
"Did you hear that?"
"Keep your eye on that building, it's coming down"
"Move it back here. Alright guys?..Sorry"
"The building is about to blow up, move it back"
"We are walking back, there's a building, about to blow up"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cU_43SwWD9A

Video med två stora explosioner från 7an med brandmän som pratar om dom
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YvrKfWkxdw

Hur som helst, wtc 7 är intressant för att:

1 Den rasar ner i 6 sek

2 Massmedian pratade inte om detta till Truthers tag upp detta.
Varför? 47 vånings hus rasade ner, med alla Secret Service, Enron, CIA förstöddes, var ett STORT story för sig.