Här kommer några missledande saker som Avery tar upp i sin film Loose Change:

**********************************************
Avery provides this quote:

"It definitely didn't look like a commercial plane, I didn't see any windows on the side. Again, it was not a normal flight that I've ever seen at an airport. It had a blue logo on the front, and it did not look like it belonged in the area."

-Mark Burnback, a FOX reporter, describing the second impact live.
**********************************************

Aside from his name being misspelled, he was over 2 miles away from the WTC when he saw the plane, as he told Popular Mechanics. Could you see the windows on this plane from miles away? And how often would you see a plane taking off or landing at an airport at 590 mph? Furthermore, Birnbach said he didn't see Flight 175 hit the South Tower. How could he have been "describing the second impact live"? Avery later plays Birnbach's quote while showing footage of the North Tower burning—and not the South Tower.

**********************************************
Avery asks why there is absolutely no trace of Flight 77? (Pentagon)
**********************************************

Finns massor av debris på bilderna på denna länken: http://internetdetectives.biz/case/lo ... ange-2#flight-77-wreckage

Kan detta vara från en flygplan?

**********************************************
He then shows a CNN clip in which a reporter says there's no evidence of a plane having crashed near the Pentagon.
**********************************************

However, Flight 77 did not crash near the Pentagon. It crashed into it. Seconds later, the reporter says he can only see small pieces. So much for "no evidence".

Avery claims the official explanation is that the intense heat from the jet fuel vaporized the entire plane. This is not mentioned in any official explanations, and it isn't what happened. He then asks how investigators could identify 184 of 189 victims if the fire was hot enough to incinerate a jumbo jet. First, "jumbo jet" usually refers to a Boeing 747, which weighs over twice as much as a 757. Second, the fire didn't incinerate the entire plane. Third, it also didn't incinerate all of the passengers.

**********************************************
Avery says Chris Bollyn (an AFP writer) contacted Honeywell, manufacturer of the 757's APU. They told him it wasn't an APU wheel. No surprise there. Bollyn then contacted Pratt & Whitney to inquire about the engines, and was told to contact Rolls-Royce. Avery then cites a portion of this AFP article:

John W. Brown, spokesman for Rolls Royce (Indianapolis), had previously told AFP: "It is not a part from any Rolls Royce engine that I'm familiar with, and certainly not the AE 3007H made here in Indy."
**********************************************

So he's consulting a spokesman at a plant that doesn't even manufacture the RB211 series. Later in the article, the spokesman admits he doesn't know anything about the engines:

Asked again if the disc in the photo is a piece of a Rolls Royce RB211-535, or from the AE 3007 series, Brown said he could not answer.

AFP then asked Brown if he was actually familiar with the parts of an AE 3007H, which is made at the Indiana plant: "No," Brown said. "I don't build the engines. I am a spokesman for the company. I speak for the company."

Kolla gärna in bilderna som finns på http://internetdetectives.biz/case/loose-change-2#the-engines

**********************************************
Avery says every single building surrounding WTC 7 stood intact, while it fell straight down into a convenient little pile in 6 seconds.
**********************************************

Antingen vet han inte vad han snackar om eller så ljuger han:

However, the Verizon building at 140 West Street next to WTC 7 was severely damaged by the collapse of the towers and WTC 7

http://www.buildings.com/Articles/detail.asp?articleID=2530

Additionally, Fiterman Hall at 30 West Broadway across the street from WTC 7 was so badly damaged it has to be demolished http://www.epa.gov/WTC/demolish_deconstruct/30wbroadway.htm. WTC 7 did not fall straight down, it fell to the southwest. The pile was neither little nor convenient; it took over 8 months to clean up the World Trade Center site with crews working 24 hours a day. And while the collapse appeared to take about 6 seconds, seismic readings recorded an event lasting for 18 seconds http://www.firehouse.com/tech/news/2002/0121_terrorist.html. WTC 7's east mechanical penthouse on top of the building fell into it several seconds before the total collapse http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch5.pdf.

**********************************************
Avery says that in 1945, a B-52 bomber crashed into the Empire State Building, killing 14 and causing $1 million in damage but leaving the building intact.
**********************************************

Vet Avery vad han pratar om eller ljuger han igen?

This is impossible, as the B-52 didn't enter production until the '50s. The actual plane was a B-25, and Avery corrects this in the recut. Unfortunately, this also undermines his entire point.

The B-25 is much, much smaller than a 767. Furthermore, the Empire State Building and the World Trade Center towers were not built alike. The Empire State Buiding has concrete-encased steel columns arranged in a grid configuration on every floor, which doesn't leave many open areas. The World Trade Center towers had exterior steel columns connected to the core columns by lightweight steel trusses, with large amounts of open floor space. A B-25 crashing into the Empire State Building is vastly different than 767s crashing into the WTC towers, and comparing these events is pointless.



Som sagt detta är bara några exempel och att ni kan bortse från detta är mycket märkligt.

Din djävla disinfotönt, vem som helst kan se att B-25 som krashade i WTC är vedertagna händelser, så vida du inte tror att NBC and ABC ljuger igenom att att påstå att händelsen har inte skett.

Jävla foliehatt.

www.google.com WTC och B-25, något som SÄPO idioten hoppas att du inte gör. Och sluta klipp och klista in en massa skit som lägervakterna i Halliburton's läger har kokat ihop, må dina barn ha microchip och dina barnbarn bli autistiska, fast då hamnar de i organ banken där de hör hemma.

Ni har verkligen inte mycket att komma med......

Quote:

straight from the horses mouth ,,inte du heller om du inte hade klippt o klistrat som du gör .....

Varför inte fråga någon drift chef på ett stålverk varför de inte sparar på el-räkningen igenom att använda flygfotogen och lite begangnade kontorsmöbler? Han skulle tro att du inte var klok och gissa vad, det är inte "debunkers" heller.