Jurriaan Maessen
Infowars
November 26, 2009

In an incredible reversal of fact and fiction the Dutch Environmental minister Jacqueline Cramer claimed today that the hackers who took the data from University of East-Anglia’s server “manipulated the numbers”, supposedly to sabotage the upcoming Copenhagen conference.
featured stories Dutch Environmental Minister Bizarrely Claims Hackers Manipulated Data in E Mails
featured stories Dutch Environmental Minister Bizarrely Claims Hackers Manipulated Data in E Mails featured stories Dutch Environmental Minister Bizarrely Claims Hackers Manipulated Data in E Mails

Dutch Environmental minister Jacqueline Cramer.


Although nobody disputes the authenticity of the e-mails, Cramer apparently does. In addition to her bizarre statement that the unknowns, after hacking into the University’s computer, somehow “changed the numbers” she even goes so far as to scream out loud: “this is just criminal. It’s unacceptable.”

Although the authenticity of the e-mails unearthed is not even disputed by the scientists who wrote them, Cramer claims they are. According to several Dutch newspapers she also added that the action by the hackers is regarded as of little consequence by the climate negotiators who gather in Copenhagen next month. She also added that she has no problem engaging climate skeptics, “but not like this.”

In response to the accusations by Cramer, Holland’s biggest newspaper De Telegraaf now reports that a member of the Dutch opposition party PVV is urging the minister to explain herself in her turn regarding the obvious fudging with climate data by the IPCC-affiliated climate research unit (translation is by PrisonPlanet.Forum member Squarepusher):


“I want to know”, stated PVV-member De Mos, “if minister Cramer does not find it despicable that people have been so utterly misled.”

Dutch geophysicist Hans Erren concurs. “This is very damning”, Erren told De Telegraaf, uttering furthermore his complete disdain for this “clique of politically motivated scientists that try to get rid of everything that does not fit their ideology.”

Now what on earth could provoke the minister to carelessly and bizarrely lie about the hackers and the data uncovered by them? The answer is: only one with an interest to perpetuate the global warming hoax. Who else would claim right off the bat that the data was fixed by the hackers?

Here’s a hint. Last month the very same environmental minister who is now angrily railing against the hackers, addressed the Club of Rome’s Global Assembly gathering held in Amsterdam in the run-up to Copenhagen. In the company of Queen Beatrix and Michael Gorbachev, she stated:

“Like so many of you, I was inspired by the Club of Rome to pursue a green career. I read the Limits to Growth as a young biology student in 1972.”

After this remarkable confession by the current environmental minister, Cramer continues worshiping the 1972 publication, saying that:

“After I had digested its importance, I couldn’t wait to do my part to help save the planet. I have no regrets that I went green- it has been a lifelong challenge and adventure.”

After calling for a “global strategy”, she stated:

“Club of Rome, thank you. You identified and put the spotlight on humankind’s predicament. And more than that. You inspire me and many, many others to take collective action. And to create an environmentally conscious movement representing all layers of society. I firmly believe that we can only transit to a sustainable economy through such a collective action. Now it is up to all of us to implement the solutions. And of course I will do my part.”

She sure does. Even when it means throwing ludicrous statements out there in the hope that someone will take her word for it.

Sources (in Dutch):

http://www.nd.nl/artikelen/2009/novem ... chelen-met-klimaatcijfers

http://llink.nl/startpagina/cramer-ha ... -klimaatcijfers-6687.html

http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/53 ... _klimaatfeiten__.html?p=2,1

Her Club of Rome that she loves so much:

http://climatechange.thinkaboutit.eu/ ... ost/the_green_revolution/


Just like Al-Qaeda was founded by the billionaire Osama bin Laden, the Club of Rome was founded by the billionaire David Rockefeller. In 1968 the Club of Rome was established at the Rockefeller’s estate at Bellagio, Italy. Both these organisations share something - they are in opposition against modern western civilisation and technology. And both wear green colour as their symbol.

It is the same Rockefeller family, that donated the land for the UNO building in New York. Two decades later, disappointed at how weak UNO is, Rockefeller tried to invent a new global religion. Because he realised that a global empire (United Earth run by UNO) cannot be built without a global religion.

Communism, fascism, Islam, Christianity… these worked only regionally. But the green religion can work on global scale.

The green religion was born in 1972, when the Club of Rome published a book, which is the Bible of environmentalism. The “Limits to Growth”. The book declared, that economic growth is a bad thing and must be stopped. In the same year, Rockefeller’s friends from UNO established UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme). If you want to hear Rockefeller in person to give a neo-Malthusian speech, go to this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClqUcScwnn8

In the book “The First Global Revolution“ (1991) the Club of Rome openly admitted, that the whole green ideology is just an artificial hoax serving as a tool to grab power.

“It would seem that men and women need a common motivation, namely a common adversary to organize and act together... The scapegoat practice is as old as mankind itself. When things become too difficult at home, divert attention by adventure abroad. Bring the divided nation together to face an outside enemy, either a real one or else one INVENTED for the purpose.”

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

In his Memoirs, Rockefeller admits, that the goal of all this is to unite the whole planet under a single government: “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists" and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

A United Earth might not be a bad thing, after all. In Star Trek it is prettty cool.

However in The First Global Revolution, they write, that the global state is not supposed to be democratic: “Democracy is not a panacea. It cannot organize everything and it is unaware of its own limits. These facts must be faced squarely. Sacrilegious though this may sound, democracy is no longer well suited for the tasks ahead. The complexity and the technical nature of many of today’s problems do not always allow elected representatives to make competent decisions at the right time.”

I disagree. I do not know any time in history, when an un-democracy would have prosperity and progress. Which means that David is either stupid or evil. Like the billionaire villains from the Bond movies. Or maybe he thinks, that we should unite Earth by force now and democratize it later. Perhaps he is right. Unification seldom goes voluntarily without the use of force. In the end it may be all good and nice. But I am not happy to go through the un-democratic period.

By the way, do you remember any referendum about Kyoto Protocol? No, of course not. They do not ask the people, if they want it. It is no democracy at all. Just like Brussels did not ask the national parliaments, whether they want to ban the Edison light-bulbs in EU. A committee of bureaucrats decides, the serfs... sorry... citizens obey.

This spooky Club of Rome is no low-cost black cabal club. It has powerful members. Al Gore is one of them and they managed to get him a Nobel Prize! Among other comrades there are Gorbatchev, Javier Solana, Kofi Annan, Bill Clinton, George Soros, Tony Blair, Václav Havel, Romano Prodi, heads of EU and UNO…

It was them, who suggested to organise the international COP conferences (COP1 was in Berlin 1995, COP15 is in Copenhagen in 2009). It was them, who came with the idea of a carbon tax (cap-n-trade). It was them who came with the idea of “peak oil” (they predicted we run out of oil by 1992). David is like a centipede - wherever you look, you can see his footprint.

And it is hardly just a coincidence, that the method of work of IPCC (established in 1988) is the SAME as the method used in the Limits of Growth. In 1972 they hired some MIT experts, in IPCC they hired some climatologist. In both cases they made wild pessimistic predictions based on MATHEMATICAL SIMULATIONS in computer models.

This all does not mean, that environmental problems do not exist. But it means, that they are exaggerated on purpose as a tool to grab political and economical power.

Sadly, they have little imagination. It is becoming rather repetitive. Always the same author, same stories, same methods, same results. Forget CO2 footprint. Think about CoR bullshit footprint instead.