Så har riksdagen och delar av svenska folket klampat rakt i fällan och har nu bidragit till att sätta fart på en händelseutveckling som ytterst syftar till att skaka om hela världens oljeindustri.

För att uttrycka mig kort och koncist: de som ligger bakom detta använder sig av samma krafter som när de drog igång anfallen mot Afghanistan och Irak. Samma "Al-Quaida" då som nu, det är inget snack om saken.

Problemet är att man svartmålar än den ene, än den andre av arabvärldens ledare utan en enda empatisk tanke, det gäller bara att kasta skit. Fåren sitter fastspända framför TV-apparaterna och jamsar lydigt med.

Det hela kommer att sluta med att man tvingar Saudi-Arabien att ingripa i grannländerna på ett sätt som kommer att beskrivas som blodigt övervåld!

Skall vi slå vad???????????????

Nu råkar det vara så att några av Obamas och amerikanska folket trognaste vänner finns inom den saudiska kungafamiljen. Obamas och USA:s allmänna välvilja kan väl diskuteras men inte den saudiska kungafamiljens. De är frigjorda från vanlig trångsynthet och kortsiktiga hänsyn och är som ledare för landet med islams heliga platser närmast att se som en sorts förvaltare av godhet och medmänsklighet mot HELA mänskligheten, vad man än tutat i folk härhemma.

Drivkraften för dessa människor är först och främst ett ord man vanligen förknippar med sjukvård och omsorg:

EMPATI

Den mest framträdande personen är en man med mycket mild framtoning. Om han vore mer känd i Sverige hade svenskarna älskat denna milde, vänlige och fantastiskt givmilda människa.

Det är han som velat bygga en moské vid Ground Zero och det är också han som hjälpt anhöriga till offren för attacken mot Ground Zero, mer känt som 9.11

Alwaleed Bin Talal al Saud, förmodligen en av världens godaste människor men med ett knivskarpt intellekt och en man värdig att få Vakens läsare att hänfört klappa i händerna...

Men nu är han (och världsfreden!) utsatt för en ondsint komplott av samma krafter som offrar vad som helst på sitt sotiga avgudaaltare för att få makt. Pengar, Barn, Folk, Länder. Freden, Hedern... vad som helst i sitt giriga vansinne.

Se detta klipp som visar hur hjälplös en människa som handlar efter sitt samvete och är driven av en uppriktig önskan att göra en skillnad mellan gott och ont kan känna sig när Fan är lös:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5AMKIW2syY

Alwaleed Bin Talal, jag ber för dig...

Här är en intressant teori om hur det hela ligger till i Libyenfrågan:

http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/V ... d-for-oil-the-vampire-war

LIBYA'S BLOOD FOR OIL: THE VAMPIRE WAR
March 28th, 2011

By Susan Lindauer, former U.S. Asset who covered Libya at the United Nations from 1995 to 2003

"Former U.S. Intelligence Asset, Susan Lindauer covered Iraq, Libya, Yemen and Syria/Hezbollah from 1993 to 2003. She is the author of Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover Ups of 9/11 and Iraq | Audio interview | Book review

Who are we kidding? The United States, Britain and NATO don't care about bombing civilians to contain rebellion. Their militaries bomb civilians every day without mercy. They have destroyed most of the community infrastructure of Iraq and Afghanistan before turning their sights on Libya. So what's really going on here?

According to the CIA, the following never happened…

Last October, US oil giants— Chevron and Occidental Petroleum— made a surprising decision to pull out of Libya, while China, Germany and Italy stayed on, signing major contracts with Gadhaffi's government. As the U.S. Asset who started negotiations for the Lockerbie Trial with Libyan diplomats, I had close ties to Libya's U.N. Mission from 1995 to 2003. Given my long involvement in the Lockerbie saga, I have continued to enjoy special access to high level intelligence gossip on Libya.

Last summer that gossip got juicy!

About July, I started hearing that Gadhaffi was exerting heavy pressure on U.S. and British oil companies to cough up special fees and kick backs to cover the costs of Libya's reimbursement to the families of Pan Am 103. Payment of damages for the Lockerbie bombing had been one of the chief conditions for ending U.N. sanctions on Libya that ran from 1992 until 2003. And of course the United Nations forced Gadhaffi to hand over two Libyan men for a special trial at The Hague, though everybody credible was fully conscious of Libya's innocence in the Lockerbie affair. (Only ignorant politicians trying to score publicity points say otherwise.)

Knowing Gadhaffi as well as I do, I was convinced that he'd done it. He'd bided his time until he could extort compensation from U.S. oil companies. He's a crafty bastard, extremely intelligent and canny. That's exactly how he operates. And now he was taking his revenge. As expected, the U.S. was hopping mad about it. Gadhaffi wasn't playing the game the way the Oil Bloodsuckers wanted. The Vampire of our age—the Oil Industry—roams the earth, sucking the life out of every nation to feed its thirst for profits. Only when they got to Libya, Gadhaffi took on the role of a modern-day Robin Hood, who insisted on replenishing his people for the costs they'd suffered under U.N. sanctions.

Backing up a year earlier, in August 2009 the lone Libyan convicted of the Lockerbie bombing that killed 270 people, Abdelbasset Megrahi, won a compassionate release from Scottish prison. Ostensibly, the British government and Scottish Courts granted Megrahi's request to die at home with dignity from advance stage cancer—in exchange for dropping a legal appeal packed with embarrassments for the European Courts. The decision to free Megrahi followed shocking revelations of corruption at the special Court of The Hague that handled the Lockerbie Trial. Prosecution witnesses confessed to receiving payments of $4 million each from the United States, in exchange for testimony against Megrahi, a mind-blowing allegation of judicial corruption.

The Lockerbie conviction was full of holes to begin with. Anybody who knows anything about terrorism in the 1980s knows the CIA got mixed up in heroin trafficking out of the Bekaa Valley during the hostage crisis in Lebanon. The Lockerbie conspiracy had been a false flag operation to kill off a joint CIA and Defense Intelligence investigation into kick backs from Islamic Jihad, in exchange for protecting the heroin transit network.

According to my own CIA handler, Dr. Richard Fuisz, who'd been stationed in Lebanon and Syria at the time, the CIA had established a protected drug route from Lebanon to Europe and on to the United States. His statements support other sources that "Operation Corea" allowed Syrian drug dealers led by Monzer al-Kassar (also linked to Oliver North in the Iran-Contra scandal) to ship heroin to the U.S. ON Pan Am flights, in exchange for intelligence on the hostages' whereabouts in Lebanon. The CIA allegedly made sure that suitcases carrying heroin were not searched at customs. Nicknamed the "Godfather of Terror," Al Kassar is now serving a prison sentence for conspiring with Colombian drug cartels to assassinate U.S. nationals.

Building up to Lockerbie, the Defense Intelligence team in Beirut, led by Maj. Charles Dennis McKee and Matthew Gannon, suspected that CIA infiltration of the heroin network might be prolonging the hostage crisis. If so, the consequence was severe. AP Reporter Terry Anderson got chained in a basement for 7 years, while 96 other high profile western hostages suffered beatings, mock executions and overall trauma. McKee's team raised the alarms in Washington that a CIA double agent profiting from the narco-dollars might be warning the hostage takers whenever their dragnet closed in. Washington sent a fact-finding team to Lebanon to gather evidence.

On the day it was blown out of the sky, Pan Am 103 was carrying that team of CIA and FBI investigators, the CIA's Deputy Chief assigned to Beirut, and three Defense Intelligence officers, including McKee and Gannon, on their way to Washington to deliver a report on the CIA's role in heroin trafficking, and the impact on terrorist financing and the hostage crisis. In short, everyone with direct knowledge of CIA kickbacks from heroin trafficking died on Pan Am 103. A suitcase packed with $500,000 worth of heroin was found in the wreckage. It belonged to investigators, as proof of the corruption.

The punch line was that the U.S. State Department issued an internal travel advisory, warning that government officials should get off that specific flight on that specific day, because Pan Am 103 was expected to get bombed. That's right, folks! The U.S. had prior knowledge of the attack.

Unforgivably, nobody told Charles McKee or Matthew Gannon. But other military officials and diplomats got pulled off the flight—making room for a group of students from Syracuse University traveling stand by for the Christmas holidays.

It was a monstrous act! But condemning Megrahi to cover up the CIA's role in heroin trafficking has struck many Lockerbie afficiandos as grossly unjust. Add the corruption of purchased testimony-- $4 million a pop— and Megrahi's life sentence struck a nerve of obscenity.

It struck Gadhaffi as grievously offensive, as well—The United Nations had forced Libya to fork over $2.7 billion in damages to the Lockerbie families, a rate of $10 million for every death. Once it became clear the U.S. paid two key witnesses $4 million each to commit perjury, spook gossip throughout the summer was rife that Gadhaffi had taken bold action to demand compensation from U.S. (and probably British) oil corporations operating in Libya. More than likely, Libya's demands for kick backs and compensation extended to other European oil conglomerates as well—particularly France and Italy—who are now spearheading attacks on Libya.

I knew last summer there would be trouble. Payback would be a b—tch on both sides. You don't lock an innocent man in prison for 10 years on bogus charges of terrorism, and expect forgiveness. The United States and Britain had behaved with remarkable selfishness. You've got to admit that Gadhaffi's attempt to balance the scales of justice demonstrated a flair of righteous nationalism.

Alas, Gadhaffi was playing with fire, no matter how justified his complaint. You don't strike a tyrant without expecting a tyrant to strike back.

And that's exactly what's happening today.

Don't kid yourself. This is an oil war, and it smacks of imperialist double standards. Two articles by Prof. Chossudovsky at the Global Research Centre are must reading: "Operation Libya and the Battle for Oil: Redrawing the Map of Africa" and "Insurrection and Military Intervention: The US-NATO Attempted Coup d'Etat in Libya?"

There is simply no justification for U.S. or NATO action against Libya. The U.N. charter acknowledges the rights of sovereign nations to put down rebellions against their own governments. Moreover, many observers have commented that plans for military intervention appear to have been much more advanced than U.S. and European leaders want to admit.

For myself, I know in my gut that war planning started months before the democratization movement kicked off throughout the Arab world—a lucky cover for U.S. and European oil policy. Perhaps too lucky.

As Chossudovsky writes, "Hundreds of US, British and French military advisers arrived in Cyrenaica, Libya's eastern breakaway province" on February 23 and 24— seven (7) days after the start of Gadhaffi's domestic rebellion. "The advisers, including intelligence officers, were dropped from warships and missile boats at the coastal towns of Benghazi and Tobruk." (DEBKAfile, US military advisers in Cyrenaica, Feb. 25, 2011) Special forces on the ground in Eastern Libya provided covert support to the rebels." Eight British Special Forces commandos were arrested in the Benghazi region, while acting as military advisers to opposition forces, according to the Times of London.

We're supposed to believe the United States, Britain and Europe planned, coordinated and executed a full military intervention in 7 short days— from the start of the Libyan rebellion in mid-February until military advisers appeared on the ground in Libya on February 23-24!

That's strategically impossible.

Nothing can persuade me that Gadhaffi's fate wasn't decided months ago, when Chevron and Occidental Petroleum took their whining to Capitol Hill, complaining that Gadhaffi's nationalism interfered with their oil profiteering. From that moment, military intervention was on the drawing board as surely as the Patriot Act got stuck in a drawer waiting for 9/11.

The message is simple: Challenge the oil corporations and your government and your people will pay the ultimate price: Give us your oil as cheaply as possible. Or die.

Don't kid yourself. Nobody gives a damn about suffering in Libya or Iraq. You don't bomb a village to save it. The U.S., Britain and NATO are the bullies of the neighborhood. The enforcers for Big Oil.

Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan have something in common. They have vast and extraordinary oil and mineral riches. As such, they are all victims of what I call the Vampire Wars. The Arab Princes get paid off, while the bloodsuckers pull the life blood out of the people. They're scarcely able to survive in their own wealthy societies. The people and the domestic economy are kept alive to uphold the social order, but they are depleted of the nourishment of their own national wealth.

The democratization movements are sending a warning that I don't think Big Oil, or their protectors in the U.S. and British governments understand or have figured out how to control. The Arab people are finished with this cycle of victimization. They've got their stakes out, and they're starting to figure out how to strike into the heart of these Vampires, sucking the life blood out of their nations.

And woe to the wicked when they do! "

Föregående inlägg innehöll en hel del intressanta upplysningar, men jag saknar det kanske självklara förhållandet att vad vi än säger om oljeindustrin och energiproduktionen i övrigt, så har vi själva genom våra politiker släppt loss vargarna.

Genom att våra politiker ju även fungerar som skatteindrivare (tänk på devisen om "svenska folkets urgamla rätt att sig själv beskatta" och liknande plattityder) har man helt enkelt genom att vara "för blyga" att ständigt höja skatten låtit energiproducenterna göra det åt sig.

Halva jäkla statsbudgeten går ju genom energiproducenternas konton!

Jag fick upp ögonen för detta under en vistelse i Italien under 1980-talet när det plötsligt uppdagades att maffian lagt under sig ett stort oljebolag och helt sonika tagit större delen av den italienska dieselskatten och stoppat i egen ficka! Pengarna var "bortiborta" helt enkelt...

Att vi sedan dess hade kronan kopplad till den italienska liren fram till euroinförandet i Italien kan ge anledning till en del intressanta funderingar...

Men för att bli ännu tydligare: VÅRA POLITIKER HAR GENOM ATT UTNYTTJA OLJEBOLAGEN OCH DE ANDRA ENERGIPRODUCENTERNA SOM SKATTEINDRIVARE SKAPAT ETT MONSTER AV PENGAR OCH MAKT!

De ack så utskällda amerikanerna har klart insett detta i många år men knallhattarna i de svenska utskotten är inte sådana insikter vuxna, helt enkelt. Det går över deras horisont!!!

En VAKEN regerings första åtgärd måste bli att rensa ut i hönshuset och få bort rävarna som vakter!

Om din verklighetsbild känns som om den inte klarar av denna insikt så läs boken "Animal Farm" så skall det nog "fisa in"!

(OBS jag menar inte dig, Perennial, utan de personer som mot förmodan läser detta och har något att säga till om här i världen, och dit hör väl varken du eller jag)

Det är svårt att göra ändringar och tillägg just nu men kanske rubriken på den här tråden är lite missvisande. Vad jag egentligen menar är att oljeindustrin i hela världen har givits en unik maktposition men att detta knappast varit deras egen önskan utan de har plötsligt insett att allt motstånd mot deras inblandning i politiken redan lamslagits av interna händelser i regeringar och politiska organisationer. Det hela påminner lite om hur ett gäng alkisar som är för slöa att gå till bolaget skickar en kille för att köpa in åt femton man. Men på väg till bolaget inser "budet" att han har pengar nog till att supa i två veckor om han sticker nån annanstans. Efter ett par veckor träffar han en av det ursprungliga gänget som blir jättearg och uttrycker sin vrede. Men "budet" som stack med pengarna då säger ungefär: "Hur i hela friden kunde ni vara så oförsiktiga??? Skicka MIG?!?!?!"

Fortsätter denna tråd, snart dags för marktrupper??

"Nato behöver fler sofistikerade plan"
http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel. ... gramid=83&artikel=4456760


"De förhoppningar som en del länder hyste i början av insatsen, nämligen att konflikten skulle ta slut snabbt när väl Nato engagerade sig militärt, de har kommit på skam."

"Nu står man inför ett mera utdraget och svårt skede. Att från flyg åstadkomma avgörande inverkan på komplicerade operationer, kanske till och med i stadsmiljö, är väldigt, väldigt svårt, säger utrikesminister Carl Bildt."

Kalle, ni har hela tiden planerat för marktrupper, får ni bara en god anledning så får vi snart se blåhattar i Libyen.. Ett blodbad skulle väl passa era planer som handen i handsken?

nu kommer marktrupperna


EU planerar för markinsats i Libyen

Quote:

http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel. ... gramid=83&artikel=4458039

Gissa om helvetet i mellanöstern kommer att bryta ut? Befarar att vi inom kort kommer att få se en false-flag/Al-CIAda-bombning inom EU efter det att en invasion av Libyen genomförts..

För övrigt så var det ca.20 timmar mellan min spekulation om marktrupper, tills det att dom nu öppet propagerar för det..

bra gissat TeBe

man undrar om det kan sprida sig till Eurasien.