Permalink

Prepare for another Fukushima! A fist sized lump of plastic explosives was found on top of the fire extinguisher in a forklift which had access to the heart of a Swedish nuclear facility. Plastic explosives of the type used for demolition are like modeling clay, which can be rammed and crammed into any space. And you cannot get a fist sized lump of this type of explosive left laying around ANYWHERE unless it came from a larger batch. You can bet the forklift brought in a whole pallet or several pallets of explosives, which are now planted inside. "A fist sized lump on the fire extinguisher, but don't worry, it did not have a detonator?" Where did that fist sized lump come from? Someone most likely spaced out, and forgot one of those fist sized lumps in the forklift while DOING THE JOB. Probably while repositioning the forklift to make it easier to grab more to cram it into the bottom of one of the reactors. OOOPS!!
All the news reports about this are playing it down, and I beg the question WHY? WHY WOULD THEY PLAY THIS DOWN? Explosives found in a nuke plant? The answer is obvious. Someone is blackmailing Sweden with a nuclear armageddon the same way they did with Fukushima, and the only way Sweden, and not Israel, will be forced to take the blame for any nuclear disasters Israel causes is to keep a tight lid on the fact that Israel is using it's victim status and the holocaust to blind people with sympathy while they use security firms to install death promises for non compliance to whatever Israel and other zioelitists want. If this was silenced in the ziopress, the Jews did this, pure and simple. And if the Swedes do ANYTHING to remove the explosives, they are no doubt under surveillance and will be set off.

If explosives were found at a Burger King in Peoria, do you think it would be more newsworthy? Why are they silent about this at a nuke plant?

I will make a guess. If Sweden now fails to give the bankers a HEFTY "bailout" and destroy their country doing it, the nuke plant goes BOOM. So it will be a choice between a physical death and a financial one. I would bet this is one of MANY nuclear facilities around the world which has been rigged to explode just like Fukushima did. This is just the one where someone spaced out and it got caught by someone who could speak around the censorship. And I predict (but I will not put a date on it) that IF the elite really feel threatened they will just destroy a large number of nuclear facilities, contaminate everything, and THEN use the window of opportunity to throw the final control net. Explosives in a nuke plant is such major news the silence on this topic is damning.

Think about this - They have TRILLIONS of dollars to blow, and have hired MILLIONS of psychologically sterilized goons, on top of having almost their entire tribe be to one extent or another psychopathic. They easily have the manpower and patience they need to get the right people into key places in various facilities to lace them with explosives under the full permission of security and the employees. Needless to say, when the places go boom they will have all called in sick, or will have left one by one in the months before the event. Explosives in ONE nuclear facility is grounds for having ALL of them shuttered and gone through by legitimate bomb teams, but you can bet that will never happen. The fact that it will not, and the media silence on this issue is proof that the world has for the most part already been conquered. The alternative press did not even run with this story. What's up with THAT?

No doubt Stuxnet also found it's way to wherever the explosives did, to create a plausible scenario before the place goes BOOM.

We need ACTION on this topic.

____________________________________________
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/explosives.html

Är det en ny händelse eller Ringhals 2012?
http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/spr ... t-pa-ringhals_7293373.svd

Det är Ringhals 2012, men enligt jim stones artikel finns förmodligen sprängmedlet kvar i Ringhals.

Ringhals gör ett sömnigt intryck när man åker forbi, vilket jag gör kanske fyra gånger om året. Men för en del år sedan sprudlade Värö Backa av liv, när personal som skulle arbeta på det nya kärnkraftverket flyttade in i nybyggda villaområden som närliggande Bua.

Idag är området ganska människotomt, man ser knappt folk utomhus och den fina båthamnen verkar inte överaktiv precis även om det finns en del båtar kvar.

Det verkar onekligen som om närheten till ett kärnkraftverk är ungefär lika livgivande som ett stort giftutsläpp, vilket är precis vad både jag och drygt hälften av svenska folket sa för trettio år sedan...

Man bytte för övrigt informationschef på verket, jag tror att det var 2012, den förre, Petersen, var en pålitlig och kunnig man, men den nya har jag aldrig talat med.

Men en mycket stor del av Sveriges energiproduktion kommer fortfarande från Ringhals, trots ivriga försäkringar om motsatsen från de professionella lögnare som verkar i våra media.

Och avfallsfrågan är fortfarande inte löst, trots löjliga tv-program om hur lätt det är att upparbeta avfallet som visas varje gång frågan kommer på tal.

Vi har ett mycket dolt lik i garderoben, och frågan har noll prioritet i våra media.

De som borde grävas upp och ställas till ansvar är ju döda för länge sedan, liksom tydligen en hel del av personalen på Ringhals...

Själv håller jag mig vid liv av en enda enkel anledning:

"Jag vill vara med den dagen dom hänger dom på torget" som Sven Stolpe sa...

Den dagen kommer.

Avfallsfrågan är löst.
"My team succeeded in closing the nuclear loop, and Carter banned our miracle with an executive order: http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/order.html

BUSTED!!!!


"Federal government" BUSTED for forcing American nuclear industry to become a ticking time bomb

Americans have been told their nuclear waste must go somewhere. Americans have been told their spent reactor fuel needs to be stored inside a mountain in the desert, where it will sit as a threat and menace to the world for millions of years. Americans have been told there is nothing they can do about it. But what if they have been told a lie? What if that "spent fuel" was not spent at all? What if a technology existed which allowed the same fuel to be used over and over, twenty times in fact, and expended so fully that fuel rods would be safe enough to handle directly out of the reactor? Think any "spent fuel pools" would be full? And even if this technology never existed,

What if foreign nations, (France was one) offered to buy this fuel from America for billions of dollars only to have the American Government refuse the offer for no reason at all? Certainly allowing France to have it would solve the problem of getting rid of it. And the final question, WHY would the American Government want so much nuclear material sitting around the country - enough to make countless atomic bombs - only to have it become a threat to America's national security? Could it be that for many years America has not had a legitimate government, and instead has had a band of invaders in power who have intentionally set America up for a fall? After reading this report, I believe you will be inclined to think so.

This report consists of hard scientific fact and even harder answers.

During my journey of discovery in my investigation into the Fukushima disaster, I interviewed an 85 year old nuclear engineer who worked in the nuclear industry during America's glory days, an engineer who earned GE over 100 patents. He was one of the engineers who designed Fukushima, so naturally when conducting an investigation into such a disaster a journalist would want that type of reference. He was surprised when my prior study of reactor systems was so thorough that he had no information about Fukushima I did not already dig up, and he was very surprised when I told him details about the inner workings of his own reactor design he never expected anyone in the media to know.

When I started to think I was going to walk away with nothing new, he began to talk about an entirely different subject. He began his new direction in the discussion with the phrase "My team succeeded in closing the nuclear loop, and Carter banned our miracle with an executive order

Here is what followed that introductory line, and an enormous reason why Americans need to seriously question the current government structure and possibly start over.

"I started in the American nuclear program all the way back at the time of the Manhattan project, and have been involved in reactor design and nuclear engineering my whole life. There was one answer we all searched for, and it was how to close the nuclear loop.
When a reactor such as a boiling water reactor uses fuel, the waste products, which are highly radioactive isotopes that have a different fission characteristic than the original fuel, build up in the fuel and change the nature of the nuclear reaction. A reactor such as a boiling water reactor can only use the fuel until it gets contaminated by these isotopes enough to change the nature of the nuclear reactions taking place. The reaction environment inside a boiling water reactor is only one such environment which will work to trigger a chain reaction, and if that spent fuel is put into a reactor made from different materials, those materials can favor the burning of the isotopes which interfere with the chain reactions in the boiling water reactor and use these interfering isotopes as fuel until they are consumed. After this process, which restores the fuel to it's original state is complete, the fuel can go back into the boiling water reactor and used as new with no reprocessing - the exact same rods can be exchanged between reactors.

We perfected the second reactor design which used liquid sodium as a coolant and the reactor ran much hotter - 1100 farenheit as opposed to 550 in a boiling water reactor. The liquid sodium circulated inside the reactor instead of water, with the heat of the reaction being removed from the system by a heat exchanger which produced steam outside the reactor for use in producing electricity. The temperature difference and coolant characteristics in the complimentary reactor facilitated the burning of the isotopes, and you got to use both sides of the reaction - the boiling water reactor produced electricity while producing unwanted isotopes, and the sodium cooled reactor produced electricity while burning the unwanted isotopes out. This process could be repeated 20 times, and when it was finished the fuel was DEAD and no longer hazardous because all of it's radiological potential was used up. It was a clean energy dream come true, and Carter banned it by executive order!

He specifically stated that the burn down was so complete that the spent fuel was safe to handle directly with bare hands, and needed no special care or maintenance at all, and after I questioned him about exactly how safe, said you could safely sleep on it. I questioned him several times, saying he must be exaggerating, but he said ALL radiological potential was used, and the fuel was completely inert at the end of the final cycle.

Many people know about the liquid sodium breeder reactor developed by General Electric in the late 1970's but few people know the real story about this reactor, which this engineer developed. To back stab the public image of this reactor, it was stated that it's rods would stick and that liquid sodium was too dangerous to use as a coolant. But this engineer, the man who developed it, stated that this media campaign was a pure psy op which like many things the media and government says had no truth to it at all.

He then went on to lament about what a waste of money it was to have the technology banned because nuclear fuel is expensive and they were only able to use it to about five percent of its total potential without implementing this technology. He lamented the fact that his life's greatest accomplishment got banned for no good reason, and it was a tremendous waste of money to not use the technology his team developed. Electricity would have been cheap. So cheap that homes would not have been heated with oil or natural gas, electricity would have been the only sensible choice. Furthermore, with a reduction in the price of electricity by at least 10X, electric cars would have quickly become a standard.

This would have been America's free energy future, with the only real cost being maintenance of infrastructure.

He was sad that we were now paying too much for electricity. I guess that's how an engineer thinks. He had read my article about Fukushima and liked it, so it is an easy guess that his eyes were open to the global conspiracy. But I think he missed the obvious in what he said.

Here is what I think about this technology being banned, and it has nothing to do with preservation of resources or free energy.

Nuclear reactors are huge. They have an enormous amount of nuclear material in them. One boiling water reactor core the size of the ones at Fukushima, which have a thermal potential of three gigawatts and an electrical generating capacity of one gigawatt can easily hold enough fissionable material to make many atomic bombs. And with the technology that makes re-using that fuel illegal, it builds up in the cooling pools at a rate of 25 tons per electrical gigawatt YEAR. This means that after 40 years of fuel buildup even small 500 megawatt facilities have approximately a million pounds of highly radioactive fuel sitting in their pools waiting for the right combination of problems to cause a disaster.

Because the Japanese were at least allowed by their government to use a reprocessing technology inferior to what this engineer spoke of, Fukushima only had approximately 250,000 pounds of "spent" fuel at each reactor site, which remained intact throughout the disaster. But because in America no reprocessing is allowed at all in any form, the fukushima equivalents in America, such as TVA operated Browns Ferry and NSP operated Prairie Island have no fewer than two million pounds of "spent" fuel at each reactor site, which means that Browns Ferry alone could, in a worst case scenario, far exceed the damage done by Fukushima.

Contrary to what the scamming mainstream press has reported, Fukushima reactor 3 was destroyed entirely while at 3,000 PSI (far beyond specifications) which resulted in a complete core expulsion. This threw approximately 100,000 pounds of fuel into the environment, much of it in the form of brown dust that badly contaminated the entire surrounding area and was found around the world. At 100,000 pounds of expelled material, reactor 3 could have produced at most 2 percent of the total contamination possible from a large American nuclear facility. This puts the possible disaster from Browns ferry at 50 to 100 times worse than Fukushima. Multiply that by Prairie Island and the over 100 other similar sized nuclear facilities in America and it is not hard to calculate that a serious national security threat exists.

When GE and others designed the nuclear facilities both in America and abroad, they had calculated that they would indeed succeed in closing the nuclear loop. So they designed the nuclear facilities with an approximate 20X safety margin in the fuel pools, because they did not have a clear date on when the technology would be perfected. It was my impression from this engineer that they got it sooner than expected. So fortunately the fuel pools were over built, but despite being over built they were never designed to withstand the fuel burdens that would result from a political decision to destroy the closed loop fuel cycle technology altogether.

So now, 40 years after the ban, America has fuel pools around the country that are so full that they have exceeded even the extremely generous safety margins they were originally designed to have, and even modest pools often have over 400 tons of highly active isotope ridden "spent" fuel in them.

Having functional fuel pool cooling systems was never intended to be necessary. GE and others wanted only a fractional core worth of fuel sitting in a pool at any one time, with at most one or two entire cores, not 15 or 20. If all cooling systems failed with only the intended maximum of one or two cores sitting in a pool there would be no boiling of the water in the pool, no pending disaster possible from equipment failure no matter how severe. But the way it is now, if there is any sort of attack or disaster which prevents fuel pool maintenance at any of the facilities in America for a period exceeding three days, the water will boil off, the fuel will catch fire and a nuclear disaster of unimaginable magnitude far in excess of Fukushima will take place. And it never needed to be this way, in fact, the situation is criminal.

Foreign nations offered help, but the American government said NO

Upon recognizing the lunacy of America's Federally mandated nuclear sabotage, countries like France and Germany stepped offered to buy America's 5% spent fuel for billions of dollars. They were not held political hostage by a hostile government, and could certainly use a source of cheap fuel. But rather than accept this offer,the American government mandated NO transport of the fuel to foreign nations, no further use whatsoever. American nuclear facilities were forced by Federal regulation to use approximately 5 percent of the fuel's radiological potential, leaving 95 percent of the radiological hazard remaining, and subsequently forced to keep it in a fuel pool that needs continuous maintenance. While arguing against this report, shills have said it was the import/export restrictions which caused such a dangerous situation in America, but since those laws were written by the same government that banned the closing of the "nuclear loop", the export restrictions are only a further indictment of the FED for causing this problem.
Simultaneous with the intentional building of the threat from having so much nuclear material sitting around came all the government scandals and lies about needing to put the fuel somewhere. Inside a mountain in the desert. Inside a dry cask. Maybe in the ocean, all the while the general American public was kept oblivious to the obvious answer: If we are not allowed to use it because of a nonsensical piece of legislation, why not let someone else have it, when they are willing to even pay for it?

Here is what I believe is the answer. And this answer needs to be spread far and wide.

Whatever you think of Kennedy, on the day of his death he was our last hope. No one since has been anything other than an enemy infiltrator, The enemy is not only inside the gates, it has been taking a paycheck from the American people for over 45 years.
Consider this: America's government intentionally put in place policies that de-industrialized America. That's an act of war. The American government put in place policies that intentionally destroyed America's schools. That's an act of war. And I consider forcing via mandate the buildup of hundreds of thousands, if not millions of nuclear warheads worth of perfectly good reactor fuel just waiting for a disaster to be an act of war as well - Only an enemy would intentionally mandate the creation of such a threat, who on earth would, other than someone who hated America? Not only did America lose a marvelous clean virtually free energy future, that future got converted into a threat that could very easily destroy the nation and take much of the world with it. All it would take to kill America, with America's nuclear facilities drastically overloaded with spent fuel, is 150 smart bombs. One successful bombing run and it is over. And that's not even taking into consideration other disaster scenarios, such as earthquakes and computer virus attacks.

Ever since Kennedy's assassination America has not had a true representative government, especially starting with Carter. When I worked for the NSA, I saw a few computers which were identical to the early vote counting computers, and they could be set to loop a single ballot over and over again. With a scammed vote, America got over-run by outsiders who wanted the country destroyed. Prior to 1973 America was only going upward, and anyone who wanted to see America destroyed would never permit Americans to get virtually free energy. They would lose oil profits. They would potentially lose control of energy, leaving the financial system the only means of forced social compliance outside of a hot war and they wanted options. True clean energy had to go.

The enemy of America is a sinister enemy. It is a small group of religiously "elite" people who weaponize everything. They have weponized sympathy, victim status, water systems, vaccines, genetically modified organisms and even terror - anything they have been able to think of, and have used these things and many more to destroy. So the nuclear industry, now blocked from a dream come true technology, can be used as a weapon.

There is plenty of proof. No shill can stop people from checking out the history of other nations, such as Germany, France and Russia offering America BILLIONS for this not so "spent" fuel, which can only sit as a hazard after a political decision banning technologies which allow for it's purification at the same time additional political decisions have banned it's export. This hazard has been unnecessarily and intentionally accumulating for years. It's the equivalent of keeping a 5,000 gallon tank of petrol in your bedroom. Better hope all is well with it.

I honestly feel that banning this miracle technology; you should have heard the sparkle, the awe in the old man's voice when he said they closed the "nuclear loop", and the sadness, despair and anger expressed at it's being banned; I feel it was an act of war against America. There were never any accidents associated with this technology, according to this engineer everything negative said about it was a bold faced lie spoken by people of ill intent. The nuclear waste problem is not scientific, it is political.

I believe this nuclear engineer opened up and told me about this because I was the first journalist he ever encountered that actually understood nuclear technology. He knew I would understand what he said and subsequently bring this story to the public. But outside of making the public aware by telling his story in an article such as this, what more can I do?

____________________________________________

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/busted1.html

Skulle man kunna få ett kort och begripligt sammandrag?

När jim stone undersökte fukushimakatastrofen intervjuvade han fukushimas konstruktör som sa att dom löst avfallsfrågan på så sätt att bränslestavarna kan återanvändas 20 gånger och efter det är dom så ofarliga att dom kan hanteras med händerna. Men det blev förbjudet av jimmy carter.

Låter mystiskt, de flesta metaller upplöses mer eller mindre av strålning. Det är därför kärnkraftverk ramlar i sönder av sig själva hela tiden. Även betong blir förändrad och lätt att smula sönder.

Japan drabbades ju av flera stora bränder i upplag för kärnavfall för tio år sedan. Ett par fartyg sjönk för övrigt utanför Japans kust i förbindelse med transporterna, varav ett var svenskt.

Strålningen förvandlar ett fartyg till nåt som närmast liknar våt papp...

Det går inte att snåla in något som helst på underhållet i ett kärnkraftverk! Rör och annat bara SKALL bytas hela tiden.

Sprängämnen är alltså ganska överflödiga om man vill skada ett kärnkraftverk...

Det vore intressant att lyssna på en intervju med jim stone men ingen vill intervjua jim stone, inte ens red ice radio. Mystiskt.

Det kan bero på att han i likhet med en hel del andra har en tendens att blanda in Israel i allting, typ Fukushimakatastrofen. Dom flesta tycker nog att det verkar rätt långsökt?

Den här länken skriver en del om "Jim Stone":

http://henrymakow.com/jim_stone_is_the_real_thing.html

Ibland har man en känsla av att det finns nån sorts "underhållningsvärde" i en del som presenteras som dokumentärer.

Det finns fakade "dokumentärer" om allt möjligt, som är skrivna i ett helt annat syfte än det föregivna.

En gång för en del år sedan körde en cyklist forbi mig i full fart på en gångstig mitt i natten och gjorde ett långt hopp nerför en trappa. När han sen körde vidare tappade han en grej som han hade haft på pakethållaren.

När jag såg omslaget visade det sig att vara en bok som föregav sig att vara en dokumentär om straffarbete för SS under andra världskriget. Sånt läser jag ibland och jag stoppade boken på mig...

Men när jag läste den insåg jag efter några kapitel att det var en masochistisk roman som var helt uppdiktad. SS tvingade en grupp cyklister att bygga en tunnel i Alperna. Dom blev piskade med gummislangar och blev våldtagna med cykelpumpar i röven och liknande i och för sig rätt dråpliga historier.

Vad lärde jag nu av detta?

Jo, att sådant som sadomasochism ofta är förklätt som helt andra ämnen.

Jim Stone tycks spela inom någon liknande division, men jag har läst för lite för att klassificera honom.

Men det finns nog en anledning till att han inte tas på allvar...

Precis vad jag själv reflekterar över. Varför? Sverige är ju ett väldans lydigt "land"/bolag som lallar lätt accepterande efter NWOs noter i hur dom ens väljer att vilja presentera sin variant av teatern.

Detta får mig vidare till saker som att vi står inför ett massivt PR-pådrag via dess varierande spektakel för att försöka åter igen trumma till rädslans bekanta bankande.

Så ja Asgeir, nått står inte riktigt rätt till. Kanske "trollen" fått sig en mer subtil och manipulerande verkningsgrad? För även dom "vaknar" och blir mer beräknande i sitt agerande för illviljan att behålla "Status Quo"...

I fred och <3!

Det handlar om utpressning, om bankerna vill ha några miljarder i bail-out och sverige inte betalar så spränger dom ringhals och som jim stone skriver:And if the Swedes do ANYTHING to remove the explosives, they are no doubt under surveillance and will be set off.
Här är ytterligare en artikel av jim stone:
NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL

Permalink

Israel's nuclear deterrent method exposed. This information was discovered as part of my fukushima report

Israel is keeping a dirty little secret . . . . .

Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist, Jan 8 2012

There is a reason why the U.S. government is waging war all over the world, even obviously against the good of the nation.

There is a reason why the U.S. government rapidly rolled over and did the banker bailout without question, in an amount which exceeded the value of every mortgage in the country by more than 3x, and every mortgage in default by over 15x; an amount which will destroy America once the ripple effect is finished.

Many of you are no doubt scratching your heads, wondering why every elected president turns back on his campaign promises the second the inaguration is complete. Believe me, the corruption of American elected officials is not that deep. You cannot elect several presidents in sequence, and have them all perfectly screw the country, ESPECIALLY the way Bush and Obama did; they had their reason, and it is called NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL.

What if they never wanted to renig (at least not so completely)? What about Obama? And what about the other countries, which also screwed their people the same way? Why is it seemingly a universal truth, that all governments around the world are simultaneously going against the will of their people, in favor of the Jewish bankers and Israel?

I believe I have figured it out, and I have documented it.

I am going to tell you the hows and whys of Israel's dirty little secret - how they got their nuclear offensive capability in place, why they decided on the chosen method, and how they ended up using it.

Israel had a serious launch dilemma

Israel is in a unique predicament. It's small land mass and hostile neighborhood have made developing a space program and ballistic missile defense system all but impossible.
Geography matters. Most nations are priviledged to have vast tracts of land suitible for space launches, or friendly neighbors who will permit the use of their airspace during a space launch. Israel is not one of them.

If a rocket is to be put to its most practical use, it must launch toward the rising sun to make use of earth's rotational velocity and add it to the speed of the rocket. If a rocket is launched towards the setting sun, it must first accelerate to the speed of the earth's rotation, and then an additional 1,000 mph just to get to where zero would have been with an eastward launch. Though it can be done, it wastes fuel and after launch another problem then presents itself - your payload will be traveling opposite to all the many thousands of other satellites and space debris in orbit and an eventual catastrophic collision is virtually assured. This has made westward launches both taboo and difficult. Westward launches are considered unacceptable, though Israel has done it.


Israel has been stifled in space of because of these difficulties. The prime Eastward launch direction will violate both Jordani and Saudi airspace, because a rocket has to reach an altitude of 60 miles to be formally above, and not trespassing on a nation. Though a straight up launch which then turns East after an acceptable altitude is reached is possible, it will waste so much fuel and require such a large rocket that it will be too impractical to be considered an option. This has spelled doom for a land based ballistic missile defense system in Israel because only a small east to west launch corridor is available over the mediterannean. So while the Israelis have launched satellites into orbit through this window, a ballistic defense system which needs a full 360 degree launch direction to be fully effective is not possible. Israel was forced to both explore and implement other methods of delivering an effective nuclear deterrent.



Sadly, their only affordable option allowed them to screw the world

What if Israel came up with a way to smuggle nuclear weapons into the most sensitive areas of all the developed nations - areas where if anything big goes BOOM all is lost? Could there be a clandestine reason for the supposed shortage of Helium 3, which is needed in the type of radiation detectors required to detect a nuclear weapon? You can block protons, but neutrons are difficult to shield entirely, and you can forget about neutrinos - you can't hide a nuke from the right detector, one which uses helium 3 in it's detector element. Why did America and all other nations somehow run out of Helium 3 a few years ago, which simultaneously left their borders open to nuclear weapons smuggling? Coincidence? I think not. The picture to the left appears to be a legitimate camera in a body that could also hold a nuke. It does not appear to actually be a nuke. HOWEVER

This particular one in the above picture appears to be a bona fide nuke camera. Note the differences - At the top of the gun barrel, there is a reinforced area to survive the ignition of the projectile propellant. The "cameras" look superficial and appear to be mounted to the surface of the barrel with very little intruding depth. Think about the webcam in your laptop or the camera in your Iphone - Nowadays that's all the depth a very good camera needs if price is no object, so it is easy to build convincing and deceptive functionality into the unit to justify it's enormous size.

Israel's main strategy has been to smuggle nuclear weapons into sensitive areas of nations under the disguise of security contracts. These security contracts use "proprietary" equipment that is maintained only by Israelis. In this particular case, the proprietary equipment is stated to be "biscopic" cameras, which are put in place by security companies operating as front companies on behalf of the Israeli Defense Forces. Magna BSP, the company which provided"security" at the Fukushima nuclear facility in Japan is one of them. During my investigation of the Fukushima mission, I studied Magna BSP and discovered that in addition to Japan, they also got security contracts in Brazil, Germany, and the United States. All 4 of these countries have provided massive financial "bailouts" to zionist bankers, and though I have not proven that all of these countries were blackmailed with the threat of a nuclear armageddon, the coincidence is very suspicious and given what happened in Japan, even a little more than suspicious. In the fukushima report the reason given was that Japan offered to enrich uranium for Iran. But shortly thereafter, Japan damaged it's economy by surrendering 1.7 trillion USD to Jewish bankers even though no prior debt was owed.



This particular "camera" is a concept drawing of what the final design will look like. But don't count on it looking that way after this report or the Fukushima report, many large items which can be excused off as security devices can also house a nuke. Additionally, other types of contracts use equipment that is very suitable for housing an implosion nuke, which is often much smaller than a gun nuke.

Gun type nukes do not produce very predictable results which is a good explanation for why the other two exploded reactors did not produce a mushroom cloud. Reactor 4, which "exploded" had been de-fueled and did not even have a core in it, this was proven with the classified photos in the Fukushima report. This made the explosion at reactor four flatly impossible. The un predictability of gun nukes is a good reason to move away from them, so I expect the gun nuke camera to be a dying breed. Perhaps the Israelis wanted to get rid of old nuclear inventory, and from the crudeness of the looks of the units delivered thus far, I suspect exactly that. I strongly recommend you take the time and read the Fukushima report in full, it's all documented from official sources, contains about 7 hours of reading material and took hundreds of hours to research out.

With the inadequately explained and inexcusable absense of helium 3, most of the world's borders are now wide open for Israel to get it's deterrent fully in place and have been for some time. I believe Israel has multiple nuclear weapons in place in key areas of the United States, Germany, Japan and Brazil, and has plans for or has succeeded in smuggling nukes into many other countries. Israel has been able to make hundreds of nuclear weapons from the reactor in Dimona, and has stolen enough nuclear material from America to make additional thousands. I believe Israel is holding the world nuclear hostage. If anyone says anything, opens their mouth, they get killed. If a nation goes against the will of Israel, and does not submit financially, BOOM. And it will all be blamed on the environment, a meteor, or "terrorists" because after all, TERRORISTS smuggle nukes in through the ports, RIGHT?

-SO-

The next time that guy you voted for renegs on his campaign promises IMMEDIATELY after inaguration
The next time your government forks over unbelievable cash to Jewish bankers and destroys your future;
The next time your government sends your children off to die in a war against a nation that never attacked you;
The next time a 911 happens;
The next time another SOPA act passes, or some other legislation no one wants passes and directs hatred at a government that needs our support to survive:

consider this article -- I BET I NAILED IT!





Brazil:http://articles.businessinsider.com/2 ... a-and-russia-brics-brazil
Germany:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7679454.stm

http://jhvonline.com/smaller-is-bette ... ce-contender-p9757-96.htm

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/us/29helium.html






____________________________________________

http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/blackmail.html

元アメリカ国家安全保障局内部告発！３１１大震災は核兵器を使った！

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/tLV2YAsFn9U" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLV2YAsFn9U