http://911blogger.com/node/14369

Aidan Monaghan

Beginning on page 22 of a Popular Mechanics 2006 book entitled Debunking 9/11 Myths, containing a forward comment by Republican presidential candidate John McCain, an attempt is made to clarify the role played by potential military aircraft intercepts during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

Citing unnamed sources, part of this section reads as follows:

When contacted by Popular Mechanics, spokesmen for NORAD and the FAA clarified their remarks by noting that scrambles were routine, but intercepts were not - especially over the continental United States.

However, according to a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Freedom of Information Act response dated March 3, 2008, the FAA concedes that records for the information alleged in part by Popular Mechanics' unnamed FAA source, do not exist.

Lyfter väl denna så inte zinkar och zpz:or lyckas missa den..

Lyfter denna och skickar med en ny artikel, eller ska jag behöva lägga denna tråd under skepticism-avdelningen?:

Air Traffic Controllers Do Track Planes Even with Transponders Off
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/ ... 08/010408Transponders.htm

" As former air traffic controller Robin Hordon, who knows the flight corridor which the two planes which hit the Twin Towers flew "like the back of my hand" and who handled two actual hijackings says:

It is important for people to understand that scrambling jet fighters to intercept aircraft showing the signs of experiencing "IN-FLIGHT EMERGENCIES" such as going off course without authorization, losing a transponder signal and/or losing radio contact is a common and routine task executed jointly between the FAA and NORAD controllers. The entire "national defense-first responder" intercept system has many highly-trained civilian and military personnel who are committed and well-trained to this task. FAA and NORAD continuously monitor our skies and fighter planes and pilots are on the ready 24/7 to handle these situations. Jet fighters typically intercept any suspect plane over the United States within 10 - 15 minutes of notification of a problem.

This type of "immediate, high speed, high priority and emergency" scramble had been happening regularly approximately 75 - 150 times per year for ten years. In the same ten years, there were ZERO "low speed, delayed reaction, and low priority" hijacking scrambles reported, which means that the only time interceptors were ever scrambled for ten years before 9/11, they were using the high speed immediate scrambles.

On 9/11, Flight 77 was in fact tracked on radar, and could have been intercepted with fighter jets. However, the plane was allowed to go on a joy-ride all over the country with its transponder off for three-quarters of an hour.

Tracking of jet reviewed
http://web.archive.org/web/2001110915 ... dtrade/digdocs/021549.htm

Du har din egen lilla tråd här ser jag Kan inte förstå hur Z och Z kan stå emot det här.

Låt oss locka dom lite till, kooooomsssi komssi komsssii

dom får väll bara skriva på forumdelen sceptisism? Annars har de varit väldigt tysta väldigt länge...

Quote:Nej då... Jag stötte på en av dom någon annanstans... Den stackaren hade irrat sig iväg till ett helt annat underforum

Zink letar väl nya bevis för att åter kunna tro på den officiella lögnen. Synd om man blev av med dom..jag hade ju precis kommit igång på allvar.