Hittade ett inlägg på en amerikansk sida där en kille nämner följande :
"Here is something to think about… About building #7, that afternoon the owner of the real estate (whatever his name is) stated after building #7 came down, “We felt the damage to the building was severe and it would be a hazard, SO I DECIDED TO PULL IT”… he decided to pull the building and just like that it came down, that afternoon. Everyone forgets about this.

It takes weeks and weeks to prepare than take down a building like that, that means the building was set up to be taken down in advance and the explosives were in place. This guy also owned the towers… were the explosives in place there too?

Now let me inform you of this; I have 30 years experience in the concrete construction trade and have busted my knuckles many times working on structures. Nothing like the trade towers but as high as twenty floors. Back in the early eighty’s, one night after a pour we were at a bar having a drink and I was conversing with an Iron Worker who had worked on such structures in the city of Chicago. The conversation got around to the fact that I was studying and taking evening classes on Architecture, he mentioned this: “In the city not only do you have to design a building to stay up, you half to design it to come down and not damage the property around it” He also said that while pouring the structure, boxed out areas are formed in the concrete at strategic locations for explosives, complete with wiring. The next time in class I asked my instructor about this and he confirmed it, but also stated that the explosives could not be placed in the building with people inhabiting it… That is a big NO, NO."

Kcoztips @ 12/04/05 21:13:16

URL: http://valis.gnn.tv/blogs/11088/Video_Clip_Hear_the_WTC_bombs