Just a quick model I created to better understand the assumed premise that wtc7 collapsed due to damage from wtc collapse.

When we compare this model to damage to bankers trust and even wtc 5 and 6 which had the entire tower collapse on it, and which didnt collapse themselves, questions come up.

Like WHY did wtc 7 collapse?

I created a picture and model to better explain:

Suppose for the sake of argument, somehow, the building was damaged THIS much.

My argument is that it may still stand due to its over engineering, and also that IF it was damaged that much it would have: FALLEN OVER towards the wtc 1 and 2 area but not a totall fast collapse on its own footprint.

An NONE of the other damaged buildings had collapsed as well, ie Bankers trust, wtc 5 and 6 etc etc....

The following in order is a picture I created in 3d to better explain my view on wtc7 assumed damage then the Damage to Bankers Trust and Wtc 5 and 6 and a map from femas report on wtc collapse

I have previously shown pictures on vaken of what REAL building collapses look like, and they in NO-WAY look anything like wtc 1 2 or 7

Awwww fuck Pictures not working here look on my site then:

http://homopope911.blogspot.com/

Err I guess I will have to figure how to post pics hehe!

But please do visit my amateur site...