http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/



BEST VIDEOS



Secrets of Christmas

http://www.pharmacratic-inquisition.com/main/ (111 min.)



Everything We’ve Been Taught About Human Origins is Wrong! Lloyd Pye

Part 1 of 8: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNGngZsxAhw (2 hours)



Medical Mafia and the Genocidal Pharmaceutical Industry

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPI7zdGdqo4 (5 min.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_FMr8kdvQY (10 min.)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfnIzYE4L8Y (5 min.)



Money As Debt

http://www.wealthycanadians.net/index ... task=view&id=54&Itemid=32 (47 min)

Hemp: really why it is ‘illegal’

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=i6HESjH-Zsg (11 min)



Media Mafia

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6073597531384658228 (58 min)



Scourge of Religion

2 videos - 2/3 down page (total: 20 min.) http://www.truthbeknown.com/



No Aeroplanes Hit the WTC

Part 1 - http://www.livevideo.com/video/socialservice/ (42 min.)



Part 2 - http://www.livevideo.com/video/social ... 55BA/foxed-out-part1.aspx (9 min.)

- and -

http://www.livevideo.com/video/social ... 3471/foxed-out-part2.aspx (8 min.)



Never Talk to the Police

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q ... talk+to+the+police&emb=0# (47 min)



Homeland Security Checkpoint

Parts 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6uw7506xMw&feature=related (22 min.)



Philosophy of Liberty

http://sedm.org/LibertyU/PhilosophyOfLiberty.htm



Great Global Warming Swindle

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzSzItt6h-s (10 min)



Emotional Healing

Brain State Technology http://www.metacafe.com/watch/782198/ ... itioning_with_lee_gerdes/



EFT - Emotional Freedom Technique

http://www.emofree.com/splash/video_popup.asp (7 min) * 4:07 - 5:15



Master Key by Charles Haanel

http://www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/mp3files/m1.mp3, /m2.mp3, etc.



Zero Limits http://www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net/files/files1.htm



Humour

FCC FU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzaqXFcsH2U (2.5 min)



Marriage and World Hunger – Sam Kinison

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1GjyrQiSRs&feature=related (6 min)

*

No responses yet

Nov 30 2008
Mary Croft - interview

Published by admin under Knowing Who You Are

Featured Interview

RICR-080807August 7, 2008

We are joined by Mary Croft, author of “How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash - Confiscatory Agency Known to Man …… A Spiritual Economics Book on $$$ and Remembering Who You Are” to discuss Real Man or Woman vs. Artificial Person (Corporation), Law, Banking, Money and the Government System as it was intended to function. Topics Discussed: Mary’s Background, Bankruptcy, Gold reserve, The Federal Reserve, USG Corporation, IMF, Commercial Law, Money as a Symbolic Means of Exchange, Natural vs. Artificial, the Fraud system, Sovereignty and much more.. We move into the topic of Birth, Birth Certificates and the procedure of registration when you’re born and the fact that a corporation is set up as an artificial person to re-present you. We’ll also talk more about Amiralty Law, Law of the Sea, the esoteric connection to the etymology and Legal Writing. We also discuss the “Banksters” behind this, their mentality and where to go to learn more and keep up to speed with Mary’s new findings.



Red Ice Creations Radio Part One Click Here

Red Ice Creations Radio Part Two Click Here

One response so far

Sep 21 2008
Here We Go, Again

Published by admin under Knowing Who You Are

Here We Go, Again.

A fellow sent me a link to Conscious Media Network which is interviews with people who tell us about the latest psychology, science, healing techniques, etc. – all fascinating, ‘good’ news. I truly enjoy this website. One can choose to whom to listen for 1/2 to 1 hour or so. Brilliant interviewer; brilliant website: consciousmedianetwork.com

The picture I saw at the first of this video seemed to be one from Nazi concentration camps – bodies strewn into pits… you’ve seen them… we’ve all seen them. I scanned the video … a few minutes at the beginning, a few minutes here and there, and the last several minutes, waiting for the solution to all the horrors this video swore we were all about to encounter. There was none. The entire video was “fear propaganda”. Someone had hacked this lovely, enlightening, often amusing, interview website. So, I rang them and emailed them to apprise them that their site had been hacked and, it seemed, I was the only one who knew this.

Regina, the beautiful woman who does the interviews, responded: ”Yes, we did put it up in response to viewer requests. A couple of them are rather highly connected (former MI6 and CIA) and felt it important to put it up with a warning, which we did do. I have some serious reservations about it as well as it leaves one feeling hopeless, which is not what we generally do. This is why we said on the page that we have no way of verifying the source. Still…..the question is “Is there truth in it?” Perhaps another question is “Even if there is truth in it, do we need to know?” Please let me know your opinion on both of those questions, I would appreciate it.”

Her most alarming comment … did you notice it? … was, “… in response to viewer requests, a couple of whom are rather highly connected - former MI-6 and CIA.” This jumped out at me and my first question to her was, “How do you know they are “former”?” I suspect they are on Goebbels’ team. [Goebbels was the Nazi propaganda expert who had learned from Bernays (Freud's nephew) about how to manipulate the people simply by using fear. They knew that when people are in a state of fear, they are highly suggestible and obedient]

Here is what so many people are missing: We create that which is on our minds and which is connected to an emotion – any emotion – because all emotions boil down to either ‘fear’ or ‘love’ and it doesn’t matter which. If emotion is involved, we will manifest that which is on our minds, whether we want it or do NOT want it.

The propagandists want, on our minds, that which THEY want. So, they toss out precisely what they want us to think about. Whether we agree with it, disagree with it, fear it, love it, whatever, they do NOT care, as long as it is in our minds. Television is the best means by which they repetitiously instill what they want us to spend our time thinking about. Presently, I notice they want us to think that we have a choice in the matter of the next CEO of the corporation called USA, Inc. which has absolutely nothing to do with us because the CEO will be “appointed” by the psychopathocracy, not “elected” by the people of a country with a similar name.

In my article, “The 144,000″, I mention that if one is not part of the solution, he remains part of the problem, by continuing to promote, i.e.: cause people to think about, what the psychopathocracy wants us to think. (see the definition of psychopath: “… has deficits or deviations in several areas: interpersonal relationships, emotion, and self-control.” (All corporations have been proven, brilliantly, in the documentary film, “Corporation”, to be psychopathic. Most likely, so are the “suits” who live by their policies.) So, these are NOT people whom we want suggesting to us where to put our attention.

Only when we stop giving these psychopaths our power, will they stop doing what they do. They NEED us to create for them that which they cannot. They have neither the numbers nor the frequency/vibration to create for themselves. (They also have not the means to create commercial energy – something we all know). They are emotionless; and emotion is required in order to create. They NEED our attention, our energy, our time! They NEED us to keep thinking about what we do NOT want so that we will create that which is on our minds which is only what THEY want. If we watch TV, if we react to their threats, if we believe in Revelations, they will get what they want – FROM US. They are using our unique gift of emotion in order to get us to give them what they want. If we comply, if we fall for this deception, we are digging our own graves. We already know these ‘people’ cannot be trusted, so why promote what they want us to do for them? Why do their dirty work for them? If we bumped into a psychopath in the street, we would walk away from him, not tell the next passer-by that which he has spewed out to us. Yet, this is precisely what is happening every time someone sends an email full of the nonsense that these aberrant entities are propounding, if we do not offer a solution to go with it. Since the solution is: not to send the email in the first place, let’s stop all this nonsense which continues to waste people’s time, attention, energy, and emotion not to mention putting it out into cyberspace where anyone can happen upon it. This stuff is tantamount to ‘child porn’, in fact, worse, because child porn is just another promotion of the psychopaths, via those whose minds were open to it. It is the pervert who created it; all the psychopaths did was to inject the concept, via propaganda, into his mind. Same as those who sell drugs to kids. The drug-pusher did it but at the behest of the psychopaths who are the real promoters of the drug biz…. same with kids shooting kids… well, the list is endless.

When will people catch onto How the Mind Works, How Energy Works, What Causes the Manifestation of the Physical? The mere fact that I am giving this matter my time, attention, energy, and emotion, right now, is contrary to the entire point I am making. What a conundrum! Yet, I feel as if it is required of me in order to get through to unconscious people – those who are still protesting that which the psychopaths WANT us to protest. I’m not suggesting we remain unaware; I am suggesting that we notice it and move onto where WE want to be. Do not allow anyone to cause you to deviate from your path. If we truly know who we are, none of this will affect us; we’ll simply be able to say “no” and walk away.

Abraham uses a great analogy. I am at a buffet for a meal and I notice that lima beans are being served. I hate lima beans. Do I rant and rave and complain and then get every patron in the place to sign a petition to stop the restaurant from serving lima beans? Or do I simply pass them by knowing that they are not for me and choose another vegetable? Some people actually WANT lima beans – believe it or not – so lima beans are fine … FOR THEM. Since lima beans are not something I would choose, I do not give them my attention, my time, my energy, or my emotion.

I ask that you all think about what you are emailing and, if you do not offer a solution to whatever you suspect is “wrong”, which immediately proves you have judged the matter, aka, already given it your time, attention, energy, and emotion and, hence, a life of its own, then you remain part of the problem and, as yet, are NOT part of the solution. What is it you want? I suspect that I know what it is that most of you who pass along this dreck and arrant nonsense want. Your ego is driven by the desire to be recognized, in these cases, to be known as the one who knew first, the one who knows what is ‘really’ going on in the world, the one whom everyone will recall as, “He told me about that months ago; I sure wish I had listened to him, then.” This is grandiosity, egotism, and the scourge of what is keeping us from ascending into our higher selves. It is holding us back spiritually.

Are you quite certain that this is what you prefer? Or do you prefer simply to be rid of all this CRAP!? Only you can do it – by NOT giving it your attention, time, energy, and emotion. Incidentally, if you think I am exempt from this, think again. Years ago, I was as ‘guilty’ of this as the next fellow. I managed to GET OVER IT! This is how I know what is going on in the minds which have yet to make the leap into knowing who they are. Please, think through what it is YOU truly want and focus on only that. Create for yourself and your fellows, only! – not for those who intend to harm us by using, against us, our own power, talent, and creativity.

We MUST begin to function at a higher vibration/frequency than the psychopaths. Remember when your mother told you to “ignore your taunting older brother”? Well, my mother told me that and it is true; he did go away. I’m not suggesting that he quit taunting me, I am saying that I essentially rose above it; I began to function at a higher vibration where he simply could not reach me. Nothing needed to be said, no protests, no fights. It was truly a win for me to realize that anyone who would treat his little sister like that was emotionally unsound. My knowing this afforded me the emotional resolve to shift ME – not him. No doubt, he is still doing what he does best but I don’t know about it because the result of my shift to a higher frequency was, simply, his disappearance from my life.

For those of you who still think that we have to tell as many people as we can about what horrors are going on, I put forth, for your consideration, this: What we see going on in the world is the RESULT of our thinking. We don’t get to vote on the way things are; we already did. Do people have a right to know? Yes, however, since we don’t know which of the billions of possible future outcomes will manifest, it is ludicrous to presume the worst. Since we do know that fear of circumstances causes manifestation of more fearful circumstances (think ‘downward spiral’) than if there were no fear, let’s put our attention onto how we want things to be. We can change our minds about anything and, thereby, alter the outcome. If you are familiar with Lynne McTaggart, you’ll know that the instant we make any choice, billions of future possibilities are eliminated and billions more are created. Remote Viewing was developed by the military for THEIR purposes – NOT altruistic purposes. Knowing that infinite possibilities already exist, what the military did was to have participants’ minds, individually, focus on the outcome which the military wanted to create in order to suit their agenda. Since more people focusing on one thing meant more energy, it increased the possibility of that particular outcome. This tells us that we can do the same thing. This is quantum physics/mechanics. The observer observes not what is observed but, rather, what the observer brings to the observation. The more agreement we have, the stronger we are. Everything is the way it is because someone said so and someone else agreed to it. So, when we have rogues out there putting their attention onto an outcome that does not suit us, they are working for the psychopaths, not for us. We are all responsible for our experiences. Make your experiences what YOU want, not what the psychopaths want.

We WILL prevail. We must learn and know that it can be done ONLY from a spiritual, vibrational perspective. We must rise to a level where the psychopaths simply cannot go. What we intend for ourselves has NOTHING to do with them. It has to do with what WE want and where WE want to go. “Ignore them and they’ll go away” sounds trite, simplistic, and juvenile, yet, it is accurate… with one caveat. We do have work to do, yet, it is ON OURSELVES. We must quit giving our resources to them and start to use them for ourselves … whatever it takes to shift our emotional, spiritual, mental, and vibrational space/time to where/when they cannot go.
Let’s stay focused on what WE want - not what ‘they’ want from us. We must get our attention off commerce. Let’s all do what we love to do and serve our fellow man by doing it. Trust me, somehow, we’ll be taken care of …. and we don’t need to know how.

My final plea: Everything…. EVERYthing that has EVER been planned, attempted, and implemented, thus far, has NOT accomplished our intent of healing the problems of this planet. The psychopaths are STILL running the world AND most of us. Is it time to quit digging deeper in the same hole and think laterally for a solution? The ‘everything’ I mention refers to intending to change something outside ourselves – people, circumstances, institutions, policies, legislation, …. even nature. Shall we now take a look at the cause? Shall we now look to the true point of power? Those are WE. We are at cause and we are the power; nothing and no one else. We are the only entities which can be changed and we are the only ones who can implement said change. Hop to it!

Mary Croft - October 2008
www.spiritualeconomicsnow.net

12 responses so far

Jul 18 2008
Two Completely Different, Separate, Distinctive Forms of Accounting.

Published by admin under Knowing Who You Are

Two Completely Different, Separate, Distinctive Forms of Accounting.

(I’ll make this as painless as I can)

If we go into a bank, find the “loan” officer, and say, “I want you to monetize some of my credit for me; what is your fee?”, he will not grasp this and ask if we want a loan. Do we explain, right then and there, that he will not be ‘lending’ us anything; he will be only performing a service for which he is already being compensated, in the form of a bi-weekly salary, to make such transactions, yet, what we want to know is, what percentage of said transaction does he charge for processing? .5%?, 3%?, … how much?

Or do we play the game and sign the note, hand it over, and deal with it later? What about the mortgage? Why would any sane man tell a bank that it can take his house from him if he fails to hand over a portion of his life and labour, over the next 20-30 years, in the form of notes which are meant for ‘private debt’ only – not ‘public debt’, and, to boot, in violation of public policy, after he has already fronted the credit to the bank for which he has received a cheque in return and that transaction was complete the instant that occurred? He would do that only if:

1. he were tricked into believing that his signature on the promissory note
a) had no value, and b) did not fund the monetization of the cheque he received; or,
2. he was a victim of extortion and fraud; or,
3. all of the above.

At the end of every bank day, all accounts must balance or nobody goes home. Banks are audited every month and if there is a glitch, I’m certain there are heavy-duty fines. No one leaves the bank at the end of the day until the ledger shows that Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable are balanced and zeroed. But, if the bank has lent out ‘money’ or even credit, wouldn’t there be an imbalance? Wouldn’t it show that the payable side of the ledger was in red or not matching the receivable side? Do banksters just hope that people will pay back what was lent out? Would such a huge industry trust this? Or would they get paid up front before anything ever left the bank? hmmm. I suspect that the reason that banks are the wealthiest institutions on the planet – maybe with the exception of the genocidal pharmaceutical industry – is because they get paid in advance before they risk any possible loss. When one is this big, one gets to call the shots. It would not work for them to sit around hoping that those to whom they gave cash, cheques, credit, etc. would swing ‘round to their place of biz every month in order to pay back what they ‘owe’. No corporation with any clout would do business that way. One might argue that they can sell the collateral, yet, banks are not in the business of pawnbroking; they are in the business of amassing cash. Pawnbroking is not a multibillion dollar industry. Wasting their time, even subcontracting it out to vendors, is not their style. They simply want the cash to roll in and so they set up their business plan well in advance of any alleged loan, in order to have that work for them. So, have we established that “hoping” to get paid back, even with collateral, is not good business sense?

A friend complained recently, “I’m in so much debt; I don’t know what to do.” Clearly, she had not read my book which emphatically points out that men and women cannot possibly be ‘in debt’. We cannot pay a debt, ergo, we cannot incur debt. It is an impossibility. Only the public can incur debt and incur it they do. Yet, this is their debt, not ours. We make the mistake of falling for their inflicting upon us the responsibility of paying their debt simply because they have programmed us into believing that we are the liable party. How did they manage this? By convincing us that we are a name and when they charge the Name, this makes us the surety – the one responsible for paying the charge. This is fine as long as we know how to do so, yet, we have been convinced that we can pay only with our labour which we exchange for dollars.

The glitch is that public entities can not pay their own debts because they are bankrupt and no bankrupt entity has any credit. Since we believe we must earn our living, when the bills arrive, we think we must pay. But, how can we do that when there are two entirely separate forms of ‘accounting’ and the one in which we operate – ‘compensation for our labour’ – has nothing to do with the form of ‘accounting’ which the public uses to ‘adjust its books’. The accounting sciences of private exchange and public bookkeeping are as unrelated as any other of the sciences, e.g.: Medicine and Health, which have only one thing in common – the human body, yet, that is where it all comes to a screeching halt. One involves pharmaceuticals and medical treatments which keep a body ill; the other involves healing by nature which results in a body becoming healthy. One is based upon big business, the other is handled by the spirit inhabiting the body. The differences between these two sciences are innumerable compared to the one and only similarity.

This is tantamount to Astronomy and Astrology. They have one thing in common – stars. After that, the differences between the two sciences are too numerous to list. They are completely unrelated; just as the means by which we men and women become compensated by one to whom we have given our energy and time and the means by which the public creates debt upon its books and desperately searches for someone willing to off-set it and allow them to balance their books. The first is known as ‘money of exchange’ (compensation) and the second is known as ‘money of account’ (adjusting/balancing the books). It is called ‘double-entry bookkeeping’. The two are completely unrelated, however, we have been tricked into believing that the two systems cross over. They do not and cannot.

When we offer our energy and our time in the form of ‘labour’ we expect to be compensated for it by the one to whom we give it. I shan’t elaborate upon the spiritual mess into which this has gotten us; suffice it to say that this has to stop if we are to prevail against the psychopathocracy which runs the world, if for no other reason than it will train our minds to see the distinction between the two forms of accounting. Whether we are compensated by substance, i.e.: gold, silver, gifts, time, etc. or the paper commonly known as ‘money’ matters not to us because we have negotiated and agreed to what is fair ‘money of exchange’. Due to that agreement, it is no one else’s business. It is a private contract based upon a meeting of the minds. No third party is permitted. Accordingly, that compensation, no matter what form it takes, cannot be taxed by a third party which might suddenly want in on the contract. It is a private contract, not a public contract.

The other, completely unrelated, form of accounting is ‘money of account’ wherein the public creates debt. This is done all the time because this is what the public does. This is how corporations come into being, aeroports get built, and yes, (yawn) roads get maintained (where some people still think that taxes go). It has nothing to do with what we do; it is simply how they operate in order to provide us what we need and want. They are involved in work which has to do with commerce. We are not or, at least, ought not to be, yet, since we are, please let’s learn how to do so without ruining our lives.

Public Accounting = Money of Account aka Double-entry Bookkeeping aka Debt Set-off

The public sends us a bill so we can set-off their debt. The bill’s amount indicates the amount of our unlimited credit they have used without our consent. They created it, but, they cannot set it off. They require us to do this for them. I know that, at this late date, we have had enough of them, yet, really, the problem is that no one ever told us how do to this. A man can neither incur nor pay any debt. We could do them a favour and offset it for them. We mustn’t allow them to confuse us with the two forms of accounting. Money of Exchange = substance based upon your labour which is real and Money of Account = just bookkeeping entries. All they need is our acceptance of their charges, our signature representing our authorization to access the treasury account, and then we instruct IRS/CRA, via tax forms, to handle the tax return.

Now that the public is using our credit, we ought to be compensated for it, right? It is our value they are using. Remember, they have no value themselves so they require ours. A line from A Course In Miracles reads: “Nothing ever leaves its source”. Since all value must return to source and close the circuit or ‘close the accounting’, when we are charged/billed, it is simply a request on the part of the public to set-off their charges for them. When it comes full circle, we will be compensated. How?

The latest is the 1099 OID, W9, 1040V and T5008, T7DR, depending upon where we operate in commerce … but it is still commerce, no matter where we are. Whatever value we personally have put into the public is against public policy; we were never meant to put our value into the public (since 1933), however since we did, it is 100% tax – dollar for dollar. Therefore, the corporation to which we gave it owes tax to IRS/CRA because it is withholding it and, if we don’t claim back our funds, they will keep it. The corporation will file a 1099 OID/ T5008 claiming that it is the source of the value and we now know that it is not – we are. If we do not file the correct forms with IRS/CRA in order to claim back that which we erringly put into the public, now IRS/CRA comes after us to pay the tax because, as it stands, it appears as if the ‘source’ of value was the corporation – because its filings indicate that. Since the tax must be paid and 100% of what we put into the public is tax, then someone has to pay, right?

If we have paid thrice for an item (1. the original credit to create it came from us, the principal, via our bond which pre-paid it (see my book); 2. the accepted return of their charge, indicated by our signature and social number; and, 3. cash/cheque/card, etc. aka ‘debt’ payment) when it ought to have been only the first two, then we are entitled to the return of the third – the cash. Unless we ask IRS/CRA for a “tax return”, it cannot balance its books and it will come after our labour (or compensation therefrom – i.e.: cash) in order for it to do so. So, we send IRS/CRA the forms identifying the correct source of the value which is we and not the corporation, and then IRS/CRA goes after them for ‘unreported income’ and 100% is returned to us, the principal from whom all credit came. These corporations, courts, etc. are all tax delinquents and in violation of public policy and the bankruptcy.

There can be NO “paying off” a public debt. The National Debt (which doesn’t really exist… well, it does, on paper, because the corporations USA, Inc. and CANADA, Inc. owe us, the shareholders – even though the media continue to lie, “Americans are in trillions of dollars of debt”. It is the corporations which are in ‘debt’ and this is because we continue to give them our debt notes/dollars and this increases the debt. See my book wherein I reveal that “working for a living” is only making the problem worse… for all of us. Paying a corporation with debt notes aka “dollars” only doubles its debt. One would think the board would not want this, yet, they want that debt because this provides them ammunition to get us to ‘pay’ more on the alleged national debt. But there can be no ‘debt’ because everything is pre-paid.

Please.
Don't put up this Acharaya S's lying crap until you have done your own research. If you are 100% shure that Jesus Christ does not exist or that he is not what he claims to be, then fine, do it. But if you have just a tiny little doubt left in you, don't do it!

Think about it. Pushing out this false information can literally prevent people from being saved.

Quote:

Offtopic and irrelevant, trying to help, but thanks for the insite into your head-space at the moment.

I didnt realise that YOU were the one who decides WHAT gets put up here. Though I started the thread.

No. That is simply not good enough. Where do you stand? Do you have any doubt? If so, why do you post links to Acharaya S?

You can put up whatever you want of course. But have you ever considered the consequences, if Acharaya S is wrong?



Look for yourself, is this the kind of person and information that you want to promote? She is obviously doing her best to destroy religion, and christianity in particular.

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm? ... rofile&friendid=120058877

Quote:

Listen:

I post all kinds of INFORMATION.

I believe STRONGLY that we all have that right, to freely do this.

Thats MY business.

You disagree.

Thats YOUR business.

Stay on topic or take it to Fight Club ; )

Quote:

Yes I can see that, but do you stand for the information you put out? Some of the information is really really bad, do you realize that?

Listen yeah?

This is MY thread. I posted that un-edited in the context of what I found on the relevant site.

Thats it.

If some people do not like that, fine, do not litter my post with your secondary comments, please.

Make your own post with your own opinions or info.

You are welcome to take this up with me via PM if you care enough to inform me.

I will edit away your unnecessary posts here in a while.

M

I did start another thread, so anybody who wants to comment are welcome there:

http://vaken.se/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=13302

I didn't know that it was forbidden to comment in your threads.

We live in a time when there is a lot of disinformation and deception everywhere, in the news, in the culture, and on the net. Even the truth movement, as you probably know, is infiltrated. Therefore it is very important that we check the information that we post. You should not spread information that you don't backup. That is how virus is spread, you know.

Quote:

Not at all, just keep to the SUBJECT my friend. ; )

Quote:


I did keep to the subject. I criticized the "truthbeknown" link that you posted. By the way, why did you remove my post in the David Icke thread? Is it forbidden to criticize David Icke?