väldigt informativt. 6 minuter om Law of the Land / Water


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a9MGB5 ... =org.mozilla:en-GB:offici

go man go!

Det här har man ju skummat lite om många gånger, men aldrig blivit riktigt övertygad om att det stämmer.

Han pratar om att varje skepp måste ha ett "certificate of manifest" till hamnmyndigheten varje gång det anländer till en hamn.

Om detta stämmer borde termen "certificate of manifest" finnas överallt på google, eller hur?

Jag får 7 resultat på Google när jag söker på:
"certificate of manifest" port

Är inte detta väldigt konstigt? Om det här är en handling som alla hamnar och skepp känner till, varför då bara 7 hits på google???

Det verkar också vara ett "amerikanskt" fenomen. Finns det någon kunnig inom svensk juridik som kan bekräfta det han pratar om?

Om någon tror på det här och också har EGEN kunskap om det, upplys mig gärna. Kan inte tro på det den här mannen säger utan några bevis.

Men shit, tittar man på Uniform Commercial Code som han pratar om så kan man hitta följande:
Quote:
Att det här skulle vara någon internationell lag som gäller över hela världen hittar man inte en rad om.
Försöker Jordan Maxwell vilseleda oss?

Ens bullshitometer behöver knappast vara nykalibrerad för att man ska fatta att det där är strunt.

Det absolut roligaste var ju dock hans snack om att man handlar med allas födelsecertifikat på aktiemarknaden i USA. (Vad är förresten "the World Stock Exchange", har jag aldrig hört talas om...)
Han kunde ju förklara hur födelsecertifikatet ger avkastning, betalar man skatt dit eller vad menar han?

"security paper" betyder alltså inte säkerhetspapper som man kunnat tro utan syftar på "financial security" (dvs värdepapper)...

Nåja han har ju iaf bra fantasi, fast det är lite Oldsberg och göteborgshumor över det hela, det är ju bara dåliga ordvitsar.

Man handlar för övrigt inte heller med ris eller metaller på aktiemarknaden.

Här har vi en förklaring från Freeman on the Land Robert Menard. Den som Maxwell säger är ungefär lika, meningen är att VI är varor. Detta är väldigt universiell:

http://sites.google.com/site/freemanonthelandproject/robert-menard
Security of a Person

“Everyone is entitled to life, liberty and the security of the person”
- Canadian Bill of Rights (1982).

These words are misleading and deceptive like many others written in legalese.
“Person”, as defined in many acts/statutes, means ‘a corporation’ or a ‘corporate entity’.

To understand what the security of a person means, one must first know that the Canadian de facto government, is de facto (section 15 of the criminal code) because it is simply governing the corporation called CANADA; not the land called Canada. In fact the two have absolutely nothing to do with each other.

This corporation, which has cleverly disguised itself as our government, has no more authority over you than McDonalds Corporation. The only way it has authority over us is through contract law or maritime law. As you read on, you will find they use a great deal of deception to make every contract a person signs, favourable to them.

A proper government (a de jure government) cannot lawfully be a corporation, and would be designed to publically serve the people. It’s only purpose would be to ensure nobody is violating another man’s rights to life, liberty and property.

When we register our children, there are three important things to know:

1. The definition of register in a law dictionary is:
“The transfer of complete ownership for a partial.”
Think about the implications of this when you register your baby, or even your car.

2. On the birth certificate is the registered child’s name, in all capital letters. This name is not the name of your child, but in fact a corporation owned by the province in which you live. When your child uses that name and signs for it during their lifetime, they are creating joinder between them and the corporation, and creating contracts that prove you are in their jurisdiction; a jurisdiction of coercion, and slavery. This is why they have the authority to tell someone that they have to act in a certain way; because they literally own your body.

3. The birth certificate is a receipt, evidencing one’s share in the corporation called CANADA. The corporation of CANADA is bankrupt, to the IMF and has pledged the life and labour of all the people with person status who have a birth certificate for repayment of their debt. There is a security evidenced on the birth certificate that represents the total output of the corporation CANADA divided by the number of people. Since we the people bring all the commercial energy to the system, we have a societal exemption, and that exemption is called the security of a person.
If you look in the Bills of Exchange Act, you will find that we are supposed to be able to walk into a store, write the words ‘accepted for value’ and ‘consumer purchase’ as well as ones social insurance number and signature on a bill of exchange, and this will be payment for the item, with the funds coming out of our security. It is in fact your signature that allows them access to this fund. But corporations would have no idea what you are talking about and would call you a thief, simply because they have been deceived like the rest of us. And so, we are forced to use another method.
Public policy HJR 192 ( Order in Council 16, April 10, 1933 = Canadian HJR 192 which took canada off the gold standard (money not backed by gold)), created in 1933 after the declaration of bankruptcy of our corporate de facto government, states that since a debt cannot be paid with a debt, all people are required to discharge the debt. This policy, and the Uniform Commercial Code is based upon and even dates back to biblical law; like the lord’s prayer, which reads “forgive us this day our debts as we forgive our debtors.”

We are in fact the creditors in this system, but the government has not told us this, simply because they want us to believe we are in debt, which is a deceptive lie; because it is CANADA and its sub-corporations that are the debtors. They want us to believe this brilliant deception so that they can confiscate our life, labour and property.
Everything in society has been funded by our birth certificate bond accounts.

When you sign your pay cheque, you’re endorsing it, and it is the tip of the pen that created the money through your signature. The money is then taken from your security and placed into your bank account.
Why do these bonds even exist in the first place?
The corporation of CANADA has issued us corporations guised as our names that we use to create contracts, which give them the legal right to confiscate our property. There is a legal maxim that states: An accessory attached to a principal becomes property of the owner of that principal; we are the accessory, the name/corporation is the principal, and the corporation of your province in which you live is the owner of that principal. The owner of the provincial corporations is the CANADA Corporation, and this is the principal on which they operate.

So, since they have issued us a name, without telling us that when we sign for that name, we are in fact giving them legal right to that property, EVERY contract we make with them is unlawful. There are four requirements of a lawful binding contract and this would fall under full disclosure, which we are not given. Since everything they do to gain authority over us is fraudulent, they had to create a remedy for us, and hope the people would never discover it... but we have!

They take everything from us using deception; so to avoid being charged with fraud, the remedy was to provide everything for us, hence the public policy that is being violated by the people every day. This is all because through deception, they made us believe we have to pay for things with our labour, which is in fact not true, since it is our labour that creates everything.

Say you’re a carpenter, your neighbour is a farmer. You fixed up his run-down house and built a new barn for him, and he repaid you with food for years to come. This is how society was intended to run, and everything works out perfectly in such a system. It’s basically like they took a system that works, and laid down a layer of deception on top of that system. They made us believe that we need money, and without it we will parish, which is the foundational object that makes one different from another; when in fact what we need is each other. Through the educational system, through the news and other forms of media, we are trained to recognise only the differences between us and others, instead of recognising that we are all one!
Divide and conquer is the motto.
“Money” is not what we want or need, and as people we are given the rights to everything we could need, we just need to open our eyes to the truth.

And if we all begin to administer our own affairs properly, instead of violating public policy HJR192, life would begin to run more smoothly, and most importantly – poverty and corruption would cease to exist.

The process begins when we make a purchase.
Since it would be a hardship for every time you enter a store to try and educate the cashier on the bills of exchange act, there is another method to discharge the company’s debt.

We simply pay the cashier like they expect, but also hand them a copy of an IRS form 1099oid, along with a 1040v, which shows them that you are forwarding this information onto the IRS, who is a third party collector for the debt of the UNITED STATES (exactly like the CRA for the corporation of CANADA). (The IRS and CRA belong to the IMF, which belongs to the World Bank, which belongs to the United Nations.)

Now, since we have told the corporation that we are sending in the 1099oid and 1040v to the IRS, this tells them that we have shown due diligence and that we know we are the creditors, and now the IRS will go after that corporation to get the funds. Now that corporation is forced to send the funds to the IRS, or has to be willing to face charges of tax evasion. What that is doing is in fact discharging the corporation’s debt. This almighty national debt that you hear of is in fact the debt of the corporations, not the debt of the people, hence we are the creditors.

That is the step that most people fail to administer. Because we are failing to tell the IRS that we have made a purchase from a certain company, they are forced to come after us instead of the corporations to get their money to balance their books.

When we do this, what happens is called double-entry accounting, where the corporation is withholding funds, and we are forced to pay the IRS to balance their books. What then happens is there are two sets of debt in circulation because the corporation withheld funds, by failing to forward them to the IRS.

Now, the money which was loaned to the corporation by the Federal Reserve or Bank of Canada, and is subject to interest, will now increase the national debt of CANADA. This is why inflation exists; simply because we are failing to do our part to discharge the public debt, therefore increasing the time that money is in circulation, which increases the interest on the loaned money from the Bank of Canada, which forces them to create more money to pay for that interest!

In Summary, the security of the person is the stock certificate of CANADA evidenced by our birth certificates. By demanding what is rightfully ours to begin with, as stated in the Bill of Rights, the certificate and the dividends of that stock must flow to us.

Ledsen att behöva hålla med zpz2, det tar verkligen emot, men den här texten säger mig ingenting. Vart är lagtexterna som bevisar att så är fallet?

Texten säger bara till oss att så här är det och nämner inga källor.

Om det ÄR så här, borde det gå att bevisa eftersom det tydligen ska finnas belägg för det i lagen.

Länktips i ämnet: http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Pseudolaw
För en diger lista med referenser till domar: http://www.adl.org/mwd/suss1.asp

Jag ångrar att jag klickade på din smutsiga länk zpz2. Jag vantrivs så fort jag hamnar på internets skuggsida..

Den som skrev den där artikeln bemöter inte argumenten som motståndarsidan för fram. Artikeln beskriver bara *att* motståndarsidan har fel och berättar inte varför.
Hatiskt ordbajsande vänt mot de som har vettet och modet att utmana systemet.

Varför har du valt som livsuppgift att motarbeta människor som tror på och har visioner om en bättre värld?

Jo, den förklarade vad som är fel: "The primary thing to look for is if the legal theory or argument has been tried before a court and whether it was rejected. If an argument has been rejected by the courts on a repeated basis anyone attempting to push that argument is practicing pseudolaw."

Det enda jag försöker motarbeta är osanningar och felaktigheter.

Quote:

Trams, jag föreslår att du läser denna dom:
http://members.iphouse.com/fredg/detax_unmasked/00-CV-14232.html

[16] Black's Law Dictionary (7th Ed.) (1999) gives as the primary meaning of the word "person", "a human being" and, as a secondary meaning, "an entity (such as a corporation) that is recognized by law as having the rights and duties of a human being". Osborn's Concise Law Dictionary (7th Ed.), (1983) defines a "person" as:

The object of rights and duties, that is, capable of having rights and of being liable to duties. Persons are of two kinds, natural and artificial. A natural person is a human being; an artificial person is a collection or succession of natural persons forming a corporation.

In the Dictionary of Canadian law (2nd Ed.) (1995), a "person" is a "natural person"' and "includes a body corporate or politic" Blackstone himself made the same distinction between natural and artificial persons and treated them all as persons in the eyes of the law (see para. [11] above).

[17] These definitions taken from dictionaries including dictionaries of legal terms are uniform and clear. A "person" in its ordinary meaning includes a human being or a natural person as well as an artificial person such as a corporation. The primary sense of the word is a natural person; the secondary sense, an artificial person such as a corporation.


Quote:
Okej... och var hittar vi de lagar som säger detta?

Quote:
Här finns denna lag:
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/B-4/index.html
Kan du visa mig hur detta framgår?

Finns det något enda exempel på att någon på detta vis lyckats betala med "funds coming out of our security".

Quote:

Detta väljer du alltså att göra på ett av alla internetforum istället för att bemöta massmedia, bankirer och politiker ? Ni "debunkers" skulle ju verkligen kunna göra nytta mot dessa istället.

Quote:

Men icehorn det finns ju inga korrupta politiker, alla vill väl och det finns ingen konspiration av eliten att skapa en global regering, alla stora tyranner genom tiderna är inte skapade av eliten och CFR finns inte.

Det berätta min skollärare så jag vet att det är sant.

Jag skulle ta Jordan Maxwell med alla hans ordlekar med en stor nypa salt om jag var er. Men det är bara min åsikt...

Här får du en video förklaring:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXbBYrAfjXo&feature=related