Om nu Griffins bok innehåller fakta varför är då slutkämmen mer frågor än svar?

Video from WTC 1 and 2 shows that the collapse started near or on the same floor that the planes hit the buildings. If the people that planted the explosive didn’t know where the plane would hit the buildings.

Do you know of any explosive technology that would work according to that scenario?

A lot of factors could have jeopardized the whole
operation of bringing the towers down with
explosives while providing a plausible illusion
that it was a natural collapse. A thorough risk
assessment must have been made by the perpetrators
and the application of appropriate measures to manage
these risks. One obvious problem is to have a
sufficiently robust demolition rig that would stay
intact after the colliding planes and subsequent
fires. It must not fail as an uncontrolled
fireworks fiasco that would blow the cover
(literally) in front of a billion live TV audience
.

- the planes may hit at an unforeseen height ->
either they had an exact control of the flight
path or the detonation rig must be insensitive to
the collision zone. Regardless, the collapse must
be started directly at the collision zones to
provide the illusion that the towers failed at its
weakest point first.

- thousands of people running up and down the
towers might actually visually see the charges
that could have been uncovered in the chaos and
make it out alive to tell the world -> charges and
controlmechanisms must be placed at hidden
locations possibly limiting the rig from being set
up for the most optimal way for demolition
purposes only. It must possibly also be disguised
as something not obviously identified as bombs.
Especially with the large number of firefighters
in the towers that would have more than an average
idea of how to recognize bombs (or exotic
accelerants in their lingo).

- igniters/charges could fail and be found intact
in the debris -> fail safe igniters/charges and/or
disguises to avoid identification (same as above)

- as ridiculous as it may sound, the towers
actually might collaps on their own, at least partly, before they
had a chance to blow it up (or rather down),
seriously increasing the risk of finding
undetonated charges in the debris and seriously
complicate the cleanup operation.

I would very much appreciate if you could forward
this question to the appropriate expertise within
the 911AEtruth organisation. Of course we will not
know exactly what happened, but you may however be
able provide a plausible scenario to remove the
shadow of a doubt that such technologies indeed
existed at that time. At a first glance from a
layman perspective you may understand that it is
implausible that explosives may be handled safely
and under control when jetliners are craching
straight into them.