6 .1.2008



Källa: Senaste nytt från Laroucherörelsen - EAP v. 1

LaRouche ansätter "brittiska imperiet" för mordet på Bhutto

Lyndon LaRouche gav den 27 december följande preliminära bedömning av mordet på före detta pakistanske premiärministern, Benazir Bhutto. Bhutto dödades av en självmordsbombare efter ett valmöte i Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

LaRouche karaktäriserade mordet som en "kaos-operation". LaRouche förklarade att han ser brittiska handavtryck överallt, med hänvisning till nyliga avslöjanden om MI6-agenter som förhandlat med talibanledare i Afghanistan. Britterna, fortsatte LaRouche, opererar med många grupper-i alla fraktioner, på alla sidor i konflikten. De arbetar mot parallella såväl som motsatta mål.

LaRouche menade att motiven bakom mordet på Bhutto är globala, inte regionala. Det finns fraktioner i brittiska oligarkin som är ute efter att fullständigt röra upp det globala läget. Det här har mer att göra med globala finanskraschen än något med politiken i Sydväst- eller södra Asien, fortsatte han. Det finns fraktioner i Londons City och allierad finansoligarki, som förstår att det nuvarande finanssystemet är dödsdömt-kollapsar redan i tilltagande takt. De ser detta som slutspelet och är besatta av att bestämma vem som överlever och vem som går under. De använder terrorism som vapen för kaos för att säkra sin överlevnad efter kollapsen.

LaRouche förklarade att han inte hänvisar till Windsor-ätten. Vad det handlar om är London-centrerad angloholländsk finansoligarki, som är ute efter att konsolidera sin imperiala kontroll över världen, under förhållanden av fullständig sammanbrottskris. Vad det handlar om är: Vem kommer att komma oskadd ur kraschen?

Den rätta frågan, för att komma närmare exakt vilka brittiska agenter som ligger bakom mordet på Bhutto, är: Vilka brittiska agenter i södra Asien-området fullständigt hatar utsikterna för all slags rationell utgång av läget? Det är startpunkten.

Quote:

Jaha du menar Rotschild alltså? Finns inga andra bankirer som har kopplingar till underättelsetjänster och terrorism.


http://century.guardian.co.uk/1930-1939/Story/0,6051,127064,00.html
Duke of Windsor in Austria


Guest at castle near Vienna

Monday December 14, 1936
Guardian Unlimited


Ex-King Edward, now Duke of Windsor, is to stay for an indefinite period as the guest of Baron Eugene de Rothschild at the latter's castle at Enzesfeld, 25 miles south of Vienna.
[This confirms the information published in the "Manchester Guardian" last week that the ex-King had arranged to go to Austria.]

The express on which the Duke of Windsor travelled from Boulogne reached Vienna at 10.05 last night. The Duke drove off at once in Baron Eugene de Rothschild's car for Enzesfeld.

The house at which the Duke is to spend the first part of his self-imposed exile is a hunting lodge with about forty rooms, standing in an estate of nearly fifteen square miles.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Intelli ... n_both_sides_of_0118.html


Intelligence officials on both sides of the Atlantic question al Qaeda role in Bhutto killingLarisa Alexandrovna
Published: Friday January 18, 2008




....when asked about the allegations that Mehsud, and thus al Qaeda, is behind the assassination, one former high-ranking CIA case officer replied, “That is total bullshit.”


....Another US intelligence source said that it would be impossible to determine who was behind the attacks because the crime scene was “hosed down and there was no autopsy.”



....Sources close to Scotland Yard say their role is not to identify who killed Mrs. Bhutto, but only to determine how she was killed. According to British intelligence, they are not directing their investigation to point to any single group or person.







Quote:

'CIA suspect in Bhutto's assassination'


Slain Pakistani opposition leader Benazir Bhutto could have been targeted by the CIA as part of its recently-exposed alleged assassination program, reports say.

On Wednesday, Washington-based investigative journalist Wayne Madsen quoted US intelligence officials as making 'prominent' references to Bhutto as a probable target of the program.

"I spoke to several US intelligence officials who were telling me that this assassination team may have targeted politicians in other countries," Madsen told Russia Today.

"One name mentioned prominently was former Pakistani prime minister Benazir Bhutto, who may have been a victim of this particular program."


http://presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=100769§ionid=3510203

CIA låg bakom attacken eftersom Obamas mål är att destalibesera pakistan så att deras trupper får tillåtelse att invadera västra och södra pakistan när den nuvarande regeringen försvinner . Den nuvarande regeringen tillåter inte amerikanska trupper att invadera pakistan och har kraftigt protesterat mot amerikanska drönattacker som dödar civila pakistanier. Men obamas mål är att kunna stoppa den enorma oljeleveransen till kina , det är globalisternas mål just nu. Dem har redan anklagat Omar-Al-Bashir för folkmord så att dem kan skicka fredsoldater till Sudan där kina får 10 % av sin olja.


Folk snackar om amerikanska/israeliska attacker mot iran . Jag vet att ingen sådan attack kommer inträffa . Obama har inte visat tecken på det inte heller israel just nu.

Det som flyter runt i Obamas skalle just nu är RYSSLAND , KINA OCH PAKISTAN. Det är hans projekt.

This article appears in the January 4, 2008 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.

The Planned Killing of Benazir Bhutto

by Ramtanu Maitra

The gruesome killing of Benazir Bhutto in the evening hours of Dec. 27 in Pakistan's garrison town of Rawalpindi is yet another step in the process of weakening, and eventual break-up, of Pakistan.

Despite the crocodile tears shed in Washington and London over Bhutto's assassination, it was a disaster waiting to happen and therefore, was altogether expected. Those who believed, naively, that Bhutto's mission was to reinstate democracy in Pakistan and put its usurpers, the Pakistani military, in the background, do not realize why she was inserted into the scene, which was already rife with violence. The truth is that the British imperial circles, with their stooges in Washington, set up Bhutto's execution, to advance their scheme to break up Pakistan, and create chaos throughout this strategic region. (See Lyndon LaRouche's statement on British role.)

Bhutto, no doubt, was a mass-based political leader, but she was a woman (an excuse used by the puppet Islamic jihadists to commit violence against a person), and she was goaded into the scene by the United States—perhaps now the most hated nation among Muslims in general—to serve Washington's purpose, which was to put the Pakistani military on the defensive and force it to share power with a democratic politician. According to the master strategists in Washington, that is the best of both worlds—the Pakistani military stays friendly, while the United States shakes off its guilt of backing a military dictator.

It is not known what transpired in the telephone call between U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Benazir Bhutto that led to Bhutto's decision to return. What promises were made will not be known unless Rice can shake off the national security garb and tell the truth. The one who knew, and could tell others, is gone.

The 9/11 event had enticed a weak-in-the-head Bush Administration to embark on a journey, the path of which was paved by the British colonialists. The vestiges of British colonial aspirations exist not only at Buckingham Palace, but even more so in the power of the intrigue and secrecy-ridden City of London.
Britain and the Muslims

The partition of India, and the formation of Pakistan, a Muslim nation, by the British Raj, was not done because the British liked Muslims. They had slaughtered them by the thousands in 1856, when the Hindus and Muslims joined hands under the last Mughal emperor, Bahadur Shah Zafar, to drive out the firenghee (white-skinned foreigners). Those who remember that untold part of the history of the Indian independence movement, talk of the piles of bodies lying in the streets of Delhi slaughtered by British soldiers. Most of them, like Benazir Bhutto and her colleagues who died on Dec. 27, were Muslims. The Muslims were "traitors" aspiring to reinstate the "despicable" and "corrupt" Mughal dynasty, London screamed.

The key to the British Empire's financial success was its ability to manipulate Islam. The British Empire-builders eliminated the Islamic Caliphate, created nations out of deserts, eliminated some nations, and partitioned others to create Islamic nations. Britain was aware that the oil fields of Arabia would be a source of great power in the post-World War II decades. The western part of British India bordered Muslim Central Asia, another major source of oil and gas, bordering Russia and Muslim Afghanistan. British India also bordered Islamic Iran and the Persian Gulf—the doorway to the oil fields of Arabia. In order to keep its future options open, Balochistan, bordering northeastern Iran, and the tribal Pushtun-dominated areas bordering Afghanistan, remained as British protectorates.

So, when the break-up of British India was planned by Churchill and others, Balochistan was not a problem. The problem was the Pushtun-dominated North West Frontier Province (NWFP), which was led by a pro-Congress Party leadership, and had voted in the last referendum before partition, to join Hindu-majority India.

What London wanted was that the large Hindu-dominated India must not have common borders with Russia, or Central Asia. That could make it too powerful and, worst of all, energy independent. Pakistan was created by the gamesmen in London because they wanted a weak Muslim state that would depend heavily on the mighty British military. The Cold War period held this arrangement in place, to the satisfaction of the British. The Kashmir dispute, triggered from London to cut off Indian access to Afghanistan, served the British policy-makers well.

But the post-Cold War days are different. China is rising in the north and seeking entry into the Persian Gulf and Central Asia through the western part of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan. China has a long-term plan to build, and build, and build, infrastructure in this area, to bring resources into its vast but thinly populated western sector that extends from bordering areas of Kazakstan under the shadows of the Tien Shan mountains in the West, to the Shaanxi province deep inside China.

What is the connection of this history to the gruesome incident that happened in the darkening shadows of Liaquat Ali Bagh in Rawalpindi? It is important for the Pakistanis, as well for the other citizens of the Indian subcontinent, to know and assimilate.

Britain wants another partition of Pakistan. Whether Washington wants it, or not, it is playing second fiddle to this absurd policy. This time, a new nation is supposed to emerge—a weak and disoriented nation, born out of violence, just like the partition of British India. This nation will consist of Pushtun-dominated North West Frontier Province (NWFP), Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), and Balochistan—all situated west of the Indus River and bordering he British-drawn disputed Durand Line that allegedly separates Afghanistan from Pakistan.

Why Bhutto?

The purpose of inserting Benazir Bhutto into the scene, after eight years of self-imposed exile, at a time when law and order had completely broken down, and even the Pakistani military was coming under serious attacks from the Islamic militants, was two-fold. The first objective, which Bhutto achieved in no time, was to put the Pakistani military on the defensive and generate demands in the street for the military to get back to barracks.

It is understood by the majority of Pakistanis, that despite the corruption that envelops the military, it is the only force in the nation that could, in the short term, maintain law and order, and fight the secessionists.

Once she put the Pakistani military on the defensive, Benazir did not become irrelevant. She became the designated qurbani (sacrifice). The killing of Benazir Bhutto has already unleashed domestic violence. In the midst of grieving Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) activists and workers, who feel betrayed and orphaned, will be the killers whose objective is to challenge the military and postpone the Jan. 8 elections. They would provoke the military to shoot at the people.

It is to be noted that the international Islamic radicals, who dip heavily into the British and other foreign intelligence sources, have infiltrated over the years into the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and the lower echelons of Pakistan's military. That makes the task of keeping Pakistan together even more challenging.

The death of Bhutto was a step to breaking up Pakistan. She, however, wanted to unify the country. The Pakistani people must see to it that her death was not in vain.

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2008/3501bhutto_killing.html