Bombshell: Bin Laden worked for US till 9/11

Former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds dropped a bombshell on the Mike Malloy radio show, guest-hosted by Brad Friedman (audio, partial transcript).

In the interview, Sibel says that the US maintained 'intimate relations' with Bin Laden, and the Taliban, "all the way until that day of September 11."

These 'intimate relations' included using Bin Laden for 'operations' in Central Asia, including Xinjiang, China. These 'operations' involved using al Qaeda and the Taliban in the same manner "as we did during the Afghan and Soviet conflict," that is, fighting 'enemies' via proxies.

As Sibel has previously described, and as she reiterates in this latest interview, this process involved using Turkey (with assistance from 'actors from Pakistan, and Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia') as a proxy, which in turn used Bin Laden and the Taliban and others as a proxy terrorist army.

Forts.
http://lukery.blogspot.com/2009/07/bo ... n-worked-for-us-till.html

http://www.infowars.com/bombshell-bin ... -worked-for-us-until-911/

Bin Laden didn't blow up the projects...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r2ySEWeU5o

För den som inte är insatt utöver vad du precis läst i inlägget ovan så kan jag tillägga att det finns en rad olika spår/teorier runt Bin Laden (syndabocken) vilket tyder på att 9/11 var någon form av insider-jobb aka stort jävla projekt. Varför fick Bin Ladens familj fick flygas ut ur USA's medans allmänt flygförbud hade trätt i kraft över hela nationens luftrum? Hur förklara släktbanden till Bush/Obama (du visste väl att Bush och Barack Obama är släkt?)

Det var tydligen hur lätt som helst för journalister/reportrar att hitta Bin Laden efter dådet för att kunna göra intervjuver.. men i princip "omöjligt" för hela världens säkerhetstjänster att gripa honom. Sanningen i det här fallet är givetvis att skattepengarna gått till att SKAPA terror istället för att STOPPA terror.

Vad mer vad mer... Jo just Bin Laden familjen har i åratal samarbetat med Bush-familjen/USA. Inte minst under kriget mot forna sovjet i slutet på 70-talet då CIA bl.a tillhandahöll Usamas motståndsrörelse med vapen. Samma vapen som USA ironiskt nog nu försöker ta bort från talibanerna.. Om du inte känner lukten av unken begraven räv vid det här laget så vete fan va d e för fel pårej =)

Quote:

Har du lust att elaborera på Bush/Obama och deras påstådda släktkoppling? Detta har jag aldrig hört förut. Väldigt intressant dock; det skulle förklara en hel del för mig. Alla andra presidenter tillhör Europeiska aristokratsläkter, men Barack Obama vet vi inte än! Att han har koppling till Bush skulle förklara otroligt mycket.

Duger New York Post som källa?
http://www.nypost.com/seven/10172007/ ... ousins__obama__cheney.htm

Obama är släkt med Churchill också.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/03/26/2199175.htm

Mer om Obama:
http://www.rense.com/general80/obmw.htm

Quote:

Inlägg nr 7:finns det med en video.

Bush/obama är släkt

Tack computerror!

Det är fanemig otroligt! VARENDA president sedan och inkluderat George Washington har europeiskt aristokratblod i sig. 34 (Nej, nu 35 antar jag) kommer direkt från Charlemagne (Karl den store) kung av frankerna på 800 talet typ.

VEM i HELA världen kan INTE se att något är VÄLDIGT FEL?

Tack än en gång; detta "illuminerade" mig mycket. ALLT stämmer!

Detta hamnar i min bok.

elaboration: eftersom de vi idag ser som makthavare lever upp till ett ursprung av total makt så bör enskild inse att den politiska arenan är som en teaterscen.. de har sedan hundratals år tillbaka haft hela linan på sin sida vilket innebär att de bar behövt släppt efter lite i taget för att hindra "revolutioner"... dvs ingen har gett oss mer frihet än den vi själva tagit tillbaka.

så länge folk inte reser sig upp och säger WTF!? så finns det heller ingen anledning för familjerna i sammhällets toppskikt att avslöja exempelvis hur pengar bara är något de gett till oss lite i taget medans de själva kan knappa in vilken siffra de vill på sitt konto. att dessutom göra vissa slavar "rika" på siffror har ju effektivt skapat ett skyddsnät där de som trodde sig klättra upp på en "rättfärdig" pyramid i själva verket bara fick ett längre fall till botten. iom att de ursprungliga bluffmakarna förmodligen kan stå och se på när de duktigaste slavarna blir brännda på bål av de upproriska slavarna.

YEARS OF DECEIT: US OPENLY ACCEPTS BIN LADEN LONG DEAD

BIN LADEN NEVER MENTIONED IN McCHRYSTAL REPORT OR OBAMA SPEECH

"HUNT FOR BIN LADEN" A NATIONAL SHAME

By Gordon Duff/STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

Conservative commentator, former Marine Colonel Bob Pappas has been saying for years that bin Laden died at Tora Bora and that Senator Kerry's claim that bin Laden escaped with Bush help was a lie. Now we know that Pappas was correct. The embarassment of having Secretary of State Clinton talk about bin Laden in Pakistan was horrific. He has been dead since December 13, 2001 and now, finally, everyone, Obama, McChrystal, Cheney, everyone who isn't nuts is finally saying what they have known for years.

However, since we lost a couple of hundred of our top special operations forces hunting for bin Laden after we knew he was dead, is someone going to answer for this with some jail time? Since we spent 200 million dollars on "special ops" looking for someone we knew was dead, who is going to jail for that? Since Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney continually talked about a man they knew was dead, now known to be for reasons of POLITICAL nature, who is going to jail for that? Why were tapes brought out, now known to be forged, as legitimate intelligence to sway the disputed 2004 election in the US? This is a criminal act if there ever was one.

In 66 pages, General Stanley McChrystal never mentions Osama bin Laden. Everything is "Mullah Omar"now. In his talk at West Point, President Obama never mentioned Osama bin Laden. Col. Pappas makes it clear, Vice President Cheney let it "out of the bag" long ago. Bin Laden was killed by American troops many many years ago.

America knew Osama bin Laden died December 13, 2001. After that, his use was hardly one to unite America but rather one to divide, scam and play games. With bin Laden gone, we could have started legitimate nation building in Afghanistan instead of the eternal insurgency that we invented ourselves.

Without our ill informed policies, we could have had a brought diplomatic solution in 2002 in Afghanistan, the one we are ignoring now, and spent money rebuilding the country, 5 cents on the dollar compared to what we are spending fighting a war against an enemy we ourselves recruited thru ignorance.

The bin Laden scam is one of the most shameful acts ever perpetrated against the American people. We don't even know if he really was an enemy, certainly he was never the person that Bush and Cheney said. In fact, the Bush and bin Laden families were always close friends and had been for many years.

What kind of man was Osama bin Laden? This one time American ally against Russia, son of a wealthy Saudi family, went to Afghanistan to help them fight for their freedom. America saw him as a great hero then. Transcripts of the real bin Laden show him to be much more moderate than we claim, angry at Israel and the US government but showing no anger toward Americans and never making the kind of theats claimed. All of this is public record for any with the will to learn.

How much of America's tragedy is tied with these two children of the rich, children of families long joined thru money and friendship, the Bush and bin Laden clans.

One son died in remote mountains, another lives in a Dallas suburb hoping nobody is sent after him. One is a combat veteran, one never took a strong stand unless done from safety and comfort. Islam once saw bin Laden as a great leader. Now he is mostly forgotten.

What has America decided about Bush?

We know this: Bin Laden always denied any ties to 9/11 and, in fact, has never been charged in relation to 9/11. He not only denied involvement, but had done so, while alive, 4 times and had vigorously condemned those who were involved in the attack.

This is on the public record, public in every free country except ours. We, instead, showed films made by paid actors, made up to look somewhat similar to bin Laden, actors who contradicted bin Ladens very public statements, actors pretending to be bin Laden long after bin Laden's death.

These were done to help justify spending, repressive laws, torture and simple thievery.

For years, we attacked the government of Pakistan for not hunting down someone everyone knew was dead. Bin Laden's death hit the newspapers in Pakistan on December 15, 2001. How do you think our ally felt when they were continually berated for failing to hunt down and turn over someone who didn't exist?

What do you think this did for American credibility in Pakistan and thru the Islamic world? Were we seen as criminals, liars or simply fools? Which one is best?

This is also treason.

How does the death of bin Laden and the defeat and dismemberment of Al Qaeda impact the intelligence assessments, partially based on, not only bin Laden but Al Qaeda activity in Iraq that,not only never happened but was now known to have been unable to happen?

How many "Pentagon Pundits," the retired officers who sold their honor to send us to war for what is now known to be domestic political dirty tricks and not national security are culpable in these crimes?

I don't always agree with Col. Pappas on things. I believe his politics overrule his judgement at times. However, we totally agree on bin Laden, simply disagree with what it means. To me lying and sending men to their deaths based on lies is treason.

Falsifying military intelligence and spending billions on unnecessary military operations for political reasons is an abomination. Consider this, giving billions in contracts to GOP friends who fill campaign coffers, and doing so based on falsified intelligence is insane. This was done for years.

We spent 8 years chasing a dead man, spending billions, sending FBI agents, the CIA, Navy Seals, Marine Force Recon, Special Forces, many to their deaths, as part of a political campaign to justify running American into debt, enriching a pack of political cronies and war profiteers and to puff up a pack of Pentagon peacocks and their Whitehouse draft dodging bosses.

How many laws were pushed thru because of a dead man?

How many hundreds were tortured to find a dead man?

How many hundreds died looking for a dead man?

How many billions were spent looking for a dead man?

Every time Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld stood before troops and talked about hunting down the dead bin Laden, it was a dishonor. Lying to men and women who put their lives on the line is not a joke.

Who is going to answer to the families of those who died for the politics and profit tied to the Hunt for Bin Laden?

http://www.veteranstoday.com/modules. ... &sid=9641&sms_ss=facebook