Quote:

Vad hände här? och vilka likheter finns det ? samt vari ligger skillnaden ?
http://svefor.levandehistoria.se/1_0_1.php?id=1225

Quote:

Ziomism är ett svar på det judiska problemet om det heliga landet, det judiska landet. Med det betyder att Israel måste innehålla en majoritet av Judar för att det ska kunna upprätthålla argumentet att Judarna måste få ha någonstans att vara.

Men detta strider mot Judendomen självt och många judar är medvetna om detta då inga humana medel kan skapa detta land, utan endast gud själv kan skapa landet.

Alltså kräver och står Zionismen för Antisemitism då antisemitism skapar ett hot mot Judar och får Judar att flytta från moderlandet till Israel.

Utdrag från www.jewsagainstzionism.com:
Theodor Herzl (1860-1904), the founder of modern Zionism, recognized that anti-Semitism would further his cause, the creation of a separate state for Jews. To solve the Jewish Question, he maintained “we must, above all, make it an international political issue.”

Herzl wrote that Zionism offered the world a welcome “final solution of the Jewish question.” In his “Diaries”, page 19, Herzl stated “Anti-Semites will become our surest friends, anti-Semitic countries our allies.”

Zionist reliance on Anti-Semitism to further their goals continues to this day. Studies of immigration records reflect increased immigration to the Zionist state during times of increased anti-Semitism. Without a continued inflow of Jewish immigrants to the state of "Israel", it is estimated that within a decade the Jewish population of the Zionist state will become the minority.

In order to maintain a Jewish majority in the state of "Israel", its leaders promote anti-Semitism throughout the world to "encourage" Jews to leave their homelands and seek "refuge".

Over the recent years there has been a dramatic rise in hate rhetoric and hate crimes targeted toward Jews:

* In Turkey...horrifying suicide bombings at two synagogues left 25 people dead and hundreds more injured.
* In Britain...Scotland Yard recently warned Britain's Jewish Community that it faced imminent terrorist attacks after police spotted and questioned a group of "tourists" taking covert videotape of the Jewish community buildings in London.
* In France...a caution was issued after an arson attack gutted a suburban Paris Jewish school--the latest incident in a frightening wave of French anti-Semitism.
* BBC - UK: "In recent weeks, a poll for the European Commission suggesting that EU citizens see Israel as the biggest threat to world peace caused outrage among Israelis."



"Zionism was supported by the German SS and Gestapo.[3] [4] [5] [6] Hitler himself personally supported Zionism.[7] [8] During the 1930’s, in cooperation with the German authorities, Zionist groups organized a network of some 40 camps throughout Germany where prospective settlers were trained for their new lives in Palestine. As late as 1942 Zionists operated at least one of these officially authorized “Kibbutz” training camps[9] over which flew the blue and white banner which would one day be adopted as the national flag of “Israel”.[10]

The Transfer Agreement (which promoted the emigration of German Jews to Palestine) implemented in 1933 and abandoned at the beginning of WWII is an important example of the cooperation between Hitler’s Germany and international Zionism. [11] Through this agreement, Hitler’s Third Reich did more than any other government during the 1930’s to support Jewish development in Palestine and further the Zionist goals.

Hitler and the Zionists had a common goal: to create a world Jewish Ghetto as a solution to the Jewish Question.

Quote:

Förstår hur du menar, däremot är det snarare massmedian som driver med anti-antisemitismen frågan... som är en DEL, sen finns det MYCKET mer information på nätet, och andra länder som inte har någonting att säger om detta.

Att vara ANTI något eller FÖR något är också en fråga....

Ezra Levant i Kanada har länge kämpat för rättan att utala sig som man vill, och VANN nyss i domstolen...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E0wuJvFo1k

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fy_4pX ... ure=player_embedded#at=90

Han är Jude och kampar för att vi skulle säger vad vi vill:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HVVko9AxVDs



Han säger:


My name is Ezra Levant. Before this government interrogation begins, I will make a statement.
When the Western Standard magazine printed the Danish cartoons of Mohammed two years ago, I was the publisher.

It was the proudest moment of my public life.

I would do it again today.

In fact, I did do it again today.

Though the Western Standard, sadly, no longer publishes a print edition, I posted the cartoons this morning on my website, ezralevant.com.


I am here at this government interrogation under protest.

It is my position that the government has no legal or moral authority to interrogate me or anyone else for publishing these words and pictures.


That is a violation of my ancient and inalienable freedoms: freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and in this case, religious freedom and the separation of mosque and state.

It is especially perverted that a bureaucracy calling itself the Alberta human rights commission would be the government agency violating my human rights.

So I will now call those bureaucrats the commission or the hrc, since to call the commission a human rights commission is to destroy the meaning of those words.


I believe that this commission has no proper authority over me.

The commission was meant as a low-level, quasi-judicial body to arbitrate squabbles about housing, employment and other matters, where a complainant felt that their race or sex was the reason they were discriminated against.

The commission was meant to deal with deeds, not words or ideas.

Now the commission, which is funded by a secular government, from the pockets of taxpayers of all backgrounds, is taking it upon itself to be an enforcer of the views of radical Islam. So much for the separation of mosque and state.


I have read the past few years worth of decisions from this commission, and it is clear that it has become a dump for the junk that gets rejected from the real legal system.

I read one case where a male hair salon student complained that he was called a loser by the girls in the class.

The commission actually had a hearing about this. Another case was a kitchen manager with Hepatitis-C, who complained that it was against her rights to be fired. The commission actually agreed with her, and forced the restaurant to pay her $4,900.

In other words, the commission is a joke its the Alberta equivalent of a U.S. television pseudo-court like Judge Judy except that Judge Judy actually was a judge, whereas none of the commissions panellists are judges, and some arent even lawyers. And, unlike the commission, Judge Judy believes in freedom of speech.


Its bad enough that this sick joke is being wreaked on hair salons and restaurants. But its even worse now that the commissions are attacking free speech.

Thats my first point: the commissions have leapt out of the small cage they were confined to, and are now attacking our fundamental freedoms.


As Alan Borovoy, Canadas leading civil libertarian, a man who helped form these commissions in the 60s and 70s, wrote, in specific reference to our magazine, being a censor is, quote, hardly the role we had envisioned for human rights commissions.

There should be no question of the right to publish the impugned cartoons. Unquote. Since the commission is so obviously out of control, he said quote It would be best, therefore, to change the provisions of the Human Rights Act to remove any such ambiguities of interpretation. Unquote.

The commission has no legal authority to act as censor.

It is not in their statutory authority.

Theyre just making it up even Alan Borovoy says so.

But even if the commissions had some statutory fig leaf for their attempts at political and religious censorship, it would still be unlawful and unconstitutional.


We have a heritage of free speech that we inherited from Great Britain that goes back to the year 1215 and the Magna Carta. We have a heritage of eight hundred years of British common law protection for speech, augmented by 250 years of common law in Canada.


Nice healthy debates are good, especially in these times where Islamic Jihad advocates are inciting death to Israel and America and other peace loving countries.