Lite ironisk rubrik då det pekar åt precis fel håll..

Först har vi Paul Krugman:

Krugman: Vi har bara sett början på problemen
http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel. ... gramid=83&artikel=3937269

"I dag har aktiekurserna fortsatt att falla över världen för tredje dagen in rad. Anledningen är dystra siffror från USA som visar att återhämtningen efter krisen tycks ha kommit av sig. Och troligen har vi bara sett början på de förnyade problemen, säger Paul Krugman, ekonomiprofessor och Nobelpristagare i ekonomi, just nu på besök i Sverige."

Sen fortsätter det:

Western Economies Face Hyperinflation: Gold Bull
http://www.cnbc.com/id/38767004/Weste ... _Hyperinflation_Gold_Bull

"The decline of the Western economic model will bring about hyperinflation and decades of painful readjustment, Egon von Greyerz, founder of gold investment intermediary Goldswitzerland.com told CNBC Thursday."

Gerald Celente: ‘Greatest Depression’ coming
http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0820/econ ... eatest-depression-coming/

"Collapse of middle class means there's no fuel for recovery, Gerald Celente argues

The US economic recovery in recent quarters is little more than a "cover-up" and the world is headed for a "Greatest Depression," complete with social unrest and class warfare, says a renowned economic forecaster."

Tips för amerikaner:

Jim Rogers: If You Want Your Family To Be Silly Rich In The Future, Then Leave America And Move To Asia Now
http://www.businessinsider.com/jim-ro ... a-and-move-to-asia-2010-8

Anledningen till den medvetet kraschade ekonomin??

Time To Terminate Western Civilization Before It Terminates Us
http://www.countercurrents.org/mcpherson180810.htm

"Global climate change threatens our species with extinction by mid-century if we do not terminate the industrial economy soon.

Ursäkta... Men vad är den "ekonomiska återhämtningen"?

Hade nog för kul igår...

Here we go again...


http://www.marketwatch.com/story/stoc ... -across-europe-2010-08-24

Hindenburg Omen Creator Has Exited The Market
http://www.prisonplanet.com/hindenbur ... as-exited-the-market.html

The latest trigger has prompted the Omen’s creator, Jim Miekka, to exit the market. “I’m taking it seriously and I’m fully out of the market now,” Miekka, a blind mathematician, said in a telephone interview from his home in Surry, Maine. “I would’ve probably stayed in until the beginning of September,” depending on how the indicators varied. “That was my basic plan, until the Hindenburg came along.”

Bostadsförsäljningen i USA rasar
http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel. ... gramid=83&artikel=3947094

"Försäljningen av befintliga bostäder sjönk med 27 procent under juli jämfört med månaden innan. Det är mer än dubbelt så mycket om bedömare väntat sig och det här ses nu som ännu ett orostecken för den amerikanska ekonomin där tillväxten bromsat in."

Det ser ekonomiskt bra ut....

Third Hindenburg Omen Confirmation
http://www.prisonplanet.com/third-hin ... rg-omen-confirmation.html

Här är den absolut bästa ekonomiska översyn om vad som komma skall gällande ekonomin enligt min syn. Så många dokumentärer om detta, men att se detta sättas in i tiden...

Sedan antyder den med att 9/11 kom lägligt i den ekonomiska läget...

An ABC - Four Corners documentary about the coming economic crisis, featuring Gerald Celente and Peter Schiff. Original air date: 23rd August, 2010.

Del 1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6FNYvC4uyM
Del 2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Jlt9lHVS8E
Del 3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_17ck3Vti8A

Så nog syns det klart att detta är "organiserat". Raset är ett faktum.
Min gissning är Nov-Jan.

Här är ytterligare en indikation på att ekonomin är på väg att säga *Pooof*. Vad har stadsstyren gjort var gång ekonomin (Fiat) fallerat?
Jo, gått ut i krig... Både för att skydda sina egna "rumpor" och rikta folkets ilska, genom att samla folket bakom flaggan...
Problem, reaction, solution.

Hoppas innerligt vi (mänskligheten) hinner vakna upp i tid och säga "Nej" till detta dårskap. Borde vi inte lärt oss av vår historia, utan att behöva genomgå det en gång till?


http://lataan.blogspot.com/2010/08/is ... assive-military-fuel.html

Om länken försvinner;

Tuesday, August 24, 2010
ISRAEL ORDERS MASSIVE MILITARY FUEL STOCKS FAR IN EXCESS OF THAT REQUIRED FOR NORMAL OPERATIONS
Three weeks ago the US Defence Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) published a notice, as it is legally required to do, announcing that Israel has ordered massive quantities of various fuels suitable for military use, and in the case of the order for JP-8 jet fuel, suitable only for military use.

The massive order is valued at some $2 billion and, as well as the 284 million gallons (1.075 billion litres) of JP-8 jet fuel, the order also includes 60 million gallons (227 million litres) of unleaded gasoline and 100 million gallons (378 million litres) of diesel fuel.

Last week I wrote of how it would not be possible for Israel to mount a ‘unilateral’ strike against Iran because Israel would require complete connivance and support for such a strike from the US. I explained, as I have in the past, how it would be necessary for the US to supply the massive amounts of fuel need for such a strike. If Israel were to strike Iran, Israel would only require the massive amounts of jet fuel and over a billion litres of jet fuel would be more that enough to do the job in practical terms.

If Israel were planning to strike Iran then that would explain the requirement for the large amounts of JP-8 fuel. However, it does not explain Israel’s need for such large amounts of gasoline and diesel fuel since an Israeli strike against Iran is unlikely to include any type of ground incursion into Iran for which these fuels would be used. The only conclusion one can draw, if Israel is not planning to actually invade Iran, which, clearly, it could not, is that Israel is planning to use the gasoline and the diesel fuel for some other ground incursion – and that can only mean an invasion of Lebanon and possibly the Gaza and West Bank when an attack against Iran is launched.

This massive order begs the question; is the final confrontation imminent? And, if not, then what is all this fuel for?

Time will tell. Jet fuel, if it’s going to be used in peak condition, doesn’t have a very long shelf life.

Ojdå, jag för visst monolog...


http://www.businessinsider.com/really ... to-fix-the-economy-2010-8

Saxad artikel;


Really What Bernanke Said Is That He Doesn't Have What It Takes To Fix The Economy


The most interesting part of Bernanke's speech to the KC Fed Symposium is where he discusses the FOMC's policy options, in the event that weakening conditions warrant more easing.

And if you read it, the basic message is: Yeah, we have some options, and none of them is likely to work very well.

In the following section, he highlights three key possibilities, and in each case he makes a very good point why they might not work.

The bottom line: If youre hopes for a recovery hinge on the Fed, you should rethink that.

A first option for providing additional monetary accommodation, if necessary, is to expand the Federal Reserve's holdings of longer-term securities. As I noted earlier, the evidence suggests that the Fed's earlier program of purchases was effective in bringing down term premiums and lowering the costs of borrowing in a number of private credit markets. I regard the program (which was significantly expanded in March 2009) as having made an important contribution to the economic stabilization and recovery that began in the spring of 2009. Likewise, the FOMC's recent decision to stabilize the Federal Reserve's securities holdings should promote financial conditions supportive of recovery.

I believe that additional purchases of longer-term securities, should the FOMC choose to undertake them, would be effective in further easing financial conditions. However, the expected benefits of additional stimulus from further expanding the Fed's balance sheet would have to be weighed against potential risks and costs. One risk of further balance sheet expansion arises from the fact that, lacking much experience with this option, we do not have very precise knowledge of the quantitative effect of changes in our holdings on financial conditions. In particular, the impact of securities purchases may depend to some extent on the state of financial markets and the economy; for example, such purchases seem likely to have their largest effects during periods of economic and financial stress, when markets are less liquid and term premiums are unusually high. The possibility that securities purchases would be most effective at times when they are most needed can be viewed as a positive feature of this tool. However, uncertainty about the quantitative effect of securities purchases increases the difficulty of calibrating and communicating policy responses.

Another concern associated with additional securities purchases is that substantial further expansions of the balance sheet could reduce public confidence in the Fed's ability to execute a smooth exit from its accommodative policies at the appropriate time. Even if unjustified, such a reduction in confidence might lead to an undesired increase in inflation expectations. (Of course, if inflation expectations were too low, or even negative, an increase in inflation expectations could become a benefit.) To mitigate this concern, the Federal Reserve has expended considerable effort in developing a suite of tools to ensure that the exit from highly accommodative policies can be smoothly accomplished when appropriate, and FOMC participants have spoken publicly about these tools on numerous occasions. Indeed, by providing maximum clarity to the public about the methods by which the FOMC will exit its highly accommodative policy stance--and thereby helping to anchor inflation expectations--the Committee increases its own flexibility to use securities purchases to provide additional accommodation, should conditions warrant.

A second policy option for the FOMC would be to ease financial conditions through its communication, for example, by modifying its post-meeting statement. As I noted, the statement currently reflects the FOMC's anticipation that exceptionally low rates will be warranted "for an extended period," contingent on economic conditions. A step the Committee could consider, if conditions called for it, would be to modify the language in the statement to communicate to investors that it anticipates keeping the target for the federal funds rate low for a longer period than is currently priced in markets. Such a change would presumably lower longer-term rates by an amount related to the revision in policy expectations.

Central banks around the world have used a variety of methods to provide future guidance on rates. For example, in April 2009, the Bank of Canada committed to maintain a low policy rate until a specific time, namely, the end of the second quarter of 2010, conditional on the inflation outlook.4 Although this approach seemed to work well in Canada, committing to keep the policy rate fixed for a specific period carries the risk that market participants may not fully appreciate that any such commitment must ultimately be conditional on how the economy evolves (as the Bank of Canada was careful to state). An alternative communication strategy is for the central bank to explicitly tie its future actions to specific developments in the economy. For example, in March 2001, the Bank of Japan committed to maintaining its policy rate at zero until Japanese consumer prices stabilized or exhibited a year-on-year increase. A potential drawback of using the FOMC's post-meeting statement to influence market expectations is that, at least without a more comprehensive framework in place, it may be difficult to convey the Committee's policy intentions with sufficient precision and conditionality. The Committee will continue to actively review its communication strategy, with the goal of communicating its outlook and policy intentions as clearly as possible.

A third option for further monetary policy easing is to lower the rate of interest that the Fed pays banks on the reserves they hold with the Federal Reserve System. Inside the Fed this rate is known as the IOER rate, the "interest on excess reserves" rate. The IOER rate, currently set at 25 basis points, could be reduced to, say, 10 basis points or even to zero. On the margin, a reduction in the IOER rate would provide banks with an incentive to increase their lending to nonfinancial borrowers or to participants in short-term money markets, reducing short-term interest rates further and possibly leading to some expansion in money and credit aggregates. However, under current circumstances, the effect of reducing the IOER rate on financial conditions in isolation would likely be relatively small. The federal funds rate is currently averaging between 15 and 20 basis points and would almost certainly remain positive after the reduction in the IOER rate. Cutting the IOER rate even to zero would be unlikely therefore to reduce the federal funds rate by more than 10 to 15 basis points. The effect on longer-term rates would probably be even less, although that effect would depend in part on the signal that market participants took from the action about the likely future course of policy. Moreover, such an action could disrupt some key financial markets and institutions. Importantly for the Fed's purposes, a further reduction in very short-term interest rates could lead short-term money markets such as the federal funds market to become much less liquid, as near-zero returns might induce many participants and market-makers to exit. In normal times the Fed relies heavily on a well-functioning federal funds market to implement monetary policy, so we would want to be careful not to do permanent damage to that market.

A rather different type of policy option, which has been proposed by a number of economists, would have the Committee increase its medium-term inflation goals above levels consistent with price stability. I see no support for this option on the FOMC. Conceivably, such a step might make sense in a situation in which a prolonged period of deflation had greatly weakened the confidence of the public in the ability of the central bank to achieve price stability, so that drastic measures were required to shift expectations. Also, in such a situation, higher inflation for a time, by compensating for the prior period of deflation, could help return the price level to what was expected by people who signed long-term contracts, such as debt contracts, before the deflation began.

ang. slutet på ekonomin... som sagt... historia.

http://america-hijacked.com/2010/08/2 ... lah-arms-depots-in-syria/

NWO muckar fan alla ställen dom kan..

"Sedan antyder den med att 9/11 kom lägligt i den ekonomiska läget..."

Så vad kommer att hända om en ännu större finansiell bubbla än den som sprack 2001 är på väg att spricka..??

Industrifastighetsbubblan i USA kommer att dra med sig allt annat......

Quote:


...dra. Du menar PULL ??

Som jag ser det har detta "monopol" spel gått över styr, ser ingen chans till en möjlighet för en återhämtning. Game over är det redan, men vi belånat vår framtid för att hålla det flytande.

Crash course i ekonomi och läget...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbePhGHF3g0&feature=sub

Krugman är på gång igen..

Krugman: This Is 1938 All Over Again, And We Need Something Like WWII To Save Us
www.businessinsider.com/krugman-1938-in-2010-2010-9

"The only thing that saved us? The war."

Nån mer som tycker att det börjar dra ihop sig till nåt stort? Med ett fett krig så blir NWO av med många problem på en och samma gång..

Ja, USA o NATO har ju jagat på alla hörn efter någon dom kan slänga grejer på... Men låt skiten rasa, så vi kan börja bygga upp en verklig "valuta", baserad på själva människan och vad den bidrar med...

Förbenade NWO som ska driva detta med att skapa massa dumheter, har vi inte lärt oss än?

Nyheterna ramlar in om den dåliga ekonomin..

Guldrusch på förnyad bankoro
http://www.e24.se/business/bank-och-f ... rnyad-bankoro_2282365.e24

Guldpriset på väg mot nya rekordnivåer
http://www.e24.se/business/ravaror/gu ... ime-high-igen_2276187.e24

Köp guld om du är orolig
http://www.e24.se/analys/foretag-och- ... -du-ar-orolig_2245563.e24

"Betala av alla skulder om du är orolig för deflation. Det gäller att äga så lite som möjligt och ha så mycket likvida medel som möjligt. Värdet på pengar stiger medan värdet på nästan alla andra tillgångar sjunker. Historien visar dock att guld är en fördelaktig investering."

Men vi kanske inte behöver oroa oss för nu ska EU ta över mer ekonomisk makt från varje nation och styra upp detta kaos.. Tobinskatten kommer nog snart på alla ekonomiska transaktioner, även våra privata.

Svensk bankavgift till EU
http://www.e24.se/makro/varlden/svens ... vgift-till-eu_2283473.e24

"Vid gårdagens möte diskuterades också möjligheten att lägga en transaktionsskatt på finanssektorn, ibland kallad Tobinskatt efter den amerikanske ekonomen."

Anders Borg argumenterade emot och hänvisade till att Sverige införde en sådan skatt på aktiehandel på 1980-talet. Den kallades ”valpskatt”, eftersom den skulle klämma åt de så kallade finansvalparna.

– Prognosen var att den skulle ge 1,5 miljarder kronor i skatter. Det blev bara 50 miljoner, eftersom handeln flyttade ut ur landet. Jag gissar att det är få av finansministrarna som tror att transaktionskatten är ett realistiskt alternativ, säger Borg."

Summan kanske duger åt finansministrarna om man beskattar alla medborgares transaktioner??

"Historiskt beslut om finanstillsyn i EU"
http://www.e24.se/makro/varlden/histo ... stillsyn-i-eu_2282187.e24

Hur gick nu citatet från Rothschild..!

"Ge mig kontrollen över nationens valuta, och jag bryr mig inte vem som stiftar landets lagar."