http://www.teamliberty.net/id282.html

The National 9/11 Debate seeks people willing to defend government account of 9/11 in a public debate forum.

As of August 1, 2006, the 9/11 Commissioners, NIST scientists , and other key personnel responsible for the government’s non-sustainable account of what happened in the United States on September 11, 2001 all refuse to participate in the National 9/11 Debate that was originally scheduled for September 16, 2006 in Charleston, SC.

Consequently, the National 9/11 Debate date has been moved forward to March 10, 2007.

While the 9/11 Commissioners and NIST scientists remain invited to participate in the National 9/11 Debate, the Muckraker Report has expanded the potential government debate team members to any qualified persons that are willing to publicly defend the government’s account of 9/11 against the civilian debate team already assembled.

“The elapsed collapse time of WTC 1, 2, and 7 debunks the government’s pancake theory of collapse. Coupled with the fact that chemical traces of substances normally associated with controlled demolition have been found on debris from ground zero, and the fact that the government never developed a working “controlled demolition hypothesis” when investigating how WTC 1, 2, and 7 collapsed even though the collapse of each clearly looked like controlled demolitions, is sufficient cause to hold a public National 9/11 Debate.

Basically, all one needs is a stopwatch to understand that the government has yet to provide a sustainable theory as to how the twin towers and building seven collapsed,” explains Ed Haas, National 9/11 Debate Coordinator.

“A $2 stopwatch provides hard evidence that the government has failed to adequately explain what happened in NYC on 9/11. Why those desperate to believe the government’s account of 9/11 continue to ignore this basic fact must be answered.”

If you’re an outspoken critic of people that disagree with the “official government theory” of 9/11, here’s a golden opportunity for you to attempt to silence the critics. If you think you have the right stuff, contact Ed Haas today.

OSPA, ZPZ anyone...

Jag tror inte det är många med huvudet på plats som ger sig upp i en debatt där dom faktiskt kan komma att debattera riktiga forskare, poliser och x-militärer.

Tiga ihjäl är också ett sätt...

Quote:

Jo det funkar ju också lol. Det är konstigt att de som enligt OSPA och Co har den mest logiska och överlägsna konspirationsteorin vägrar ställa upp, det borde de ju göra, de som förespråkar de alternativa teorierna skulle ju bli krossade, eller...

Och att påstå att NIST och Co inte har tid med konspirationstokar etc är verkligen en riktigt dålig ursäkt.