vaken

Vakencorner




BottomBottom  Previous Topic Previous Topic  Next Topic Next Topic   Register To Post



WTC fires 1975 3 TIMMAR 11 VÅNINGAR = NO Truss Damage or COLLAPSE
#1


See User information
Sant.

Check it out: http://belgrade.indymedia.org/news/2005/04/104_comment.php

1975 WTC BIG fires, 11 floors, no truss damage to be repaired.

And to TRY to have us believe that small fires for such short times cause TOTAL collapse 26 years later, WITH fireproofing added, which they did NOT have in 1975. I believe.

Either way, 1975 George Bushs brother didnt have control of Security and Silverstein wasnt involved.

Hmmm.....

Posted on: 2006/8/17 15:12
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: WTC fires 1975 3 TIMMAR 11 VÅNINGAR = NO Truss Damage or COLLAPSE
#2


See User information
Det finns länkar till kopior av New York times artiklar på sidan oxå

Posted on: 2006/8/17 15:15
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: WTC fires 1975 3 TIMMAR 11 VÅNINGAR = NO Truss Damage or COLLAPSE
#3


See User information
Bra Homopope!
Jag har tagit upp den branden 2-3ggr tidigare utan någon respons. Finns med i wikipedia. Som sagt det va ju inte nå allvarligt alls tydligen och branden var på 11:e våningen så trycket uppifrån borde ju varit maasssooor med ton tyngre än toppen av byggnaden... mystiskt eller!?.

February 13, 1975 fire

On February 13, 1975, the WTC North Tower was beset by a fire, which "burned at temperatures in excess of 700°C (1,292°F) for over three hours and spread over some 65 percent of the 11th floor, including the core, caused no serious structural damage to the steel structure. In particular, no trusses needed to be replaced."

Sources: New York Times, Saturday 15th February 1975
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center

Posted on: 2006/8/17 15:26
"We don't receive wisdom, we must discover it for ourselves after a journey that no one can take for us or spare us."-Marcel Proust

Youngevity Associate
http://ygy-90-for-life.webnode.se/
http://naturligtvis.my90forlife.com/ http://tinyurl.com/Y...
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Anonym
Re: WTC fires 1975 3 TIMMAR 11 VÅNINGAR = NO Truss Damage or COLLAPSE
#4
Quote:

Homopope wrote:
Sant.

Check it out: http://belgrade.indymedia.org/news/2005/04/104_comment.php

1975 WTC BIG fires, 11 floors, no truss damage to be repaired.

And to TRY to have us believe that small fires for such short times cause TOTAL collapse 26 years later, WITH fireproofing added, which they did NOT have in 1975. I believe.

Either way, 1975 George Bushs brother didnt have control of Security and Silverstein wasnt involved.

Hmmm.....

Oh, so the 1975 fire was a BIG fire and the 9/11 fires were small. Wow... that's a very "interesting" way of putting it.

"Commissioner O'Hagan said that the absence of fire-stopper material in gaps around the telephone cables had allowed the blaze to spread to other floors within the cable shaft. Inside the shaft, it spread down to the 9th floor and up to the 16th floor, but the blaze did not escape from the shaft out into room or hallways on the other floors.
........
Only the 11th floor office area was burned"

Not big fires on 11 floors, that's an outright lie!

Were there any previous structural damage 1975? Any planes hitting or something like that?

Marvin Bush didn't have control of security at WTC 9/11 2001.

"First, Marvin Bush had nothing to do with the day-to-day operations of security at the World Trade Center. Second, he left his position as a board member of the company that did provide security in June 2000, more than 14 months before the terrorist attacks."
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/ ... rstood-lies-in-loose.html

If you want others than conspiracy maniacs to listen to you, you need to stop lying!

 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: WTC fires 1975 3 TIMMAR 11 VÅNINGAR = NO Truss Damage or COLLAPSE
#5


See User information
Quote:
If you want others than conspiracy maniacs to listen to you, you need to stop lying!


Haha du är ju en conspiracy maniac! Du tror att några snubbar med knivar genomförde 9/11 och att bränder och skador drog ner WTC 7 jämnt och fint på 6 sekunder LMAO!

Posted on: 2006/8/17 17:16


"Absolute certainty is a privilege of uneducated minds and fanatics" - CJ Keyser
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: WTC fires 1975 3 TIMMAR 11 VÅNINGAR = NO Truss Damage or COLLAPSE
#6


See User information
Quote:

zpz wrote:
Quote:

Homopope wrote:
Sant.

Check it out: http://belgrade.indymedia.org/news/2005/04/104_comment.php

1975 WTC BIG fires, 11 floors, no truss damage to be repaired.

And to TRY to have us believe that small fires for such short times cause TOTAL collapse 26 years later, WITH fireproofing added, which they did NOT have in 1975. I believe.

Either way, 1975 George Bushs brother didnt have control of Security and Silverstein wasnt involved.

Hmmm.....

Oh, so the 1975 fire was a BIG fire and the 9/11 fires were small. Wow... that's a very "interesting" way of putting it.

"Commissioner O'Hagan said that the absence of fire-stopper material in gaps around the telephone cables had allowed the blaze to spread to other floors within the cable shaft. Inside the shaft, it spread down to the 9th floor and up to the 16th floor, but the blaze did not escape from the shaft out into room or hallways on the other floors.
........
Only the 11th floor office area was burned"

Not big fires on 11 floors, that's an outright lie!

Were there any previous structural damage 1975? Any planes hitting or something like that?

Marvin Bush didn't have control of security at WTC 9/11 2001.

"First, Marvin Bush had nothing to do with the day-to-day operations of security at the World Trade Center. Second, he left his position as a board member of the company that did provide security in June 2000, more than 14 months before the terrorist attacks."
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/ ... rstood-lies-in-loose.html

If you want others than conspiracy maniacs to listen to you, you need to stop lying!


Howdy DUDE!

Great to see you are back in tp form.

being that I was never there, dont know if you were, lets take a quote from someone who was:

"It was like fighting a blow torch" according to Captain Harold Kull of Engine Co. 6,........
Flames could be seen pouring out of 11th floor windows on the east side of the building.

OOPS here is more:

So, this was a very serious fire which spread over some 65 per cent of the eleventh floor (the core plus half the office area) in the very same building that supposedly "collapsed" on 9/11 due to a similar, or lesser, fire. This fire also spread to a number of other floors. And although it lasted over 3 hours, it caused no serious structural damage and trusses survived the fires without replacement and supported the building for many, many more years after the fires were put out.

It should be emphasized that the North Tower suffered no serious structural damage from this fire. In particular, no trusses needed to be replaced.

That the 1975 fire was more intense than the 9/11 fires is evident from the fact that it caused the 11th floor east side windows to break and flames could be seen pouring from these broken windows. This indicates a temperature greater than 700°C. In the 9/11 fires the windows were not broken by the heat (only by the aircraft impact) indicating a temperature below 700°C.

Ok, now refute this as you probably will :
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_1975_fire.html

To emphasise, "small fires" in terms of the amount of time burning, sorry for the idea that they were somehow little, I meant small in terms of TIME as in "SMALL amount of time...."

WARNING prisonplanet link (u wont like that probably either way: http://www.prisonplanet.com/Pages/Apr_05/100405_WTC_Fire.html )

Posted on: 2006/8/17 17:31
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: WTC fires 1975 3 TIMMAR 11 VÅNINGAR = NO Truss Damage or COLLAPSE
#7


See User information
Quote:

zpz wrote:
Quote:

Homopope wrote:
Sant.

Check it out: http://belgrade.indymedia.org/news/2005/04/104_comment.php

1975 WTC BIG fires, 11 floors, no truss damage to be repaired.

And to TRY to have us believe that small fires for such short times cause TOTAL collapse 26 years later, WITH fireproofing added, which they did NOT have in 1975. I believe.

Either way, 1975 George Bushs brother didnt have control of Security and Silverstein wasnt involved.

Hmmm.....

Oh, so the 1975 fire was a BIG fire and the 9/11 fires were small. Wow... that's a very "interesting" way of putting it.

"Commissioner O'Hagan said that the absence of fire-stopper material in gaps around the telephone cables had allowed the blaze to spread to other floors within the cable shaft. Inside the shaft, it spread down to the 9th floor and up to the 16th floor, but the blaze did not escape from the shaft out into room or hallways on the other floors.
........
Only the 11th floor office area was burned"

Not big fires on 11 floors, that's an outright lie!

Were there any previous structural damage 1975? Any planes hitting or something like that?

Marvin Bush didn't have control of security at WTC 9/11 2001.

"First, Marvin Bush had nothing to do with the day-to-day operations of security at the World Trade Center. Second, he left his position as a board member of the company that did provide security in June 2000, more than 14 months before the terrorist attacks."
http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/ ... rstood-lies-in-loose.html

If you want others than conspiracy maniacs to listen to you, you need to stop lying!



Oh RIIIIGHT, screwloosechange.com... I get it, was just a matter of time till you armed yourself with THOSE FACTS..

Posted on: 2006/8/17 19:33
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: WTC fires 1975 3 TIMMAR 11 VÅNINGAR = NO Truss Damage or COLLAPSE
#8


See User information
Quote:
Oh RIIIIGHT, screwloosechange.com... I get it, was just a matter of time till you armed yourself with THOSE FACTS


Haha! Certain people are actually working on a screw screw loose change video muaha!

Posted on: 2006/8/18 10:52


"Absolute certainty is a privilege of uneducated minds and fanatics" - CJ Keyser
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 








dvd-infobeställning banner längst ned.
Ikoner
Paypal
Stötta Vaken med en månatlig donation
Facebook
Gå även med i vår facebook-grupp och bli en av de över 15 000 som diskuterar där.
Login
Annonsorer och reklam
Annonser:






Annonsorer och reklam 2


Creeper MediaCreeper
Vilka är Online
33 user(s) are online (33 user(s) are browsing Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 33

more...
Nya medlemmar
test_user
test_user
01/01/2020
brifrida 09/05/2019
Turbozz 08/15/2019
Fr4nzz0n 07/30/2019
Egenerfarenhett 05/19/2019
Bloggar o Länkar

I11time.dk
911 Truth i Danmark.
Se verkligheten
Dissekerar skildringar från massmedia.
Den dolda agendan
Nyheter på svenska.
Klarsikt
Mats Sederholm & Linda Bjuvgård.
Dominic Johansson
Hjälp Dominic att komma hem.
Mjölkpallen
Mjölkpallen är samlingsplatsen där bonnförnuftet tros ha sitt säte.
911truth.no
911 Truth i Norge.
Nyhetsspeilet.no
Nyheter på norska.
En bild säger mer ...
Citat från eliten som bilder.
Folkvet
Sanningen är dold bland lögnerna
Fred & Frihet
Geoengineering.se
Hur påverkar geoengineering dig?
Grundläggande frihetsbegrepp på svenska

RSS