6. So we go there and on the north and east side of 7 it didn‚t look like
there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there
had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors.
Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good. But they had a
hose line operating. Like I said, it was hitting the sidewalk across the
street, but eventually they pulled back too.
Then we received an order from Fellini, we‚re going to make a move on 7. That
was the first time really my stomach tightened up because the building didn‚t
look good. I was figuring probably the standpipe systems were shot. There was
no hydrant pressure. I wasn‚t really keen on the idea. Then this other officer
I‚m standing next to said, that building doesn‚t look straight. So I‚m standing
there. I‚m looking at the building. It didn‚t look right, but, well, we‚ll go
in, we‚ll see.
So we gathered up rollups and most of us had masks at that time. We headed to-
ward 7. And just around we were about a hundred yards away and Butch Brandeis
came running up. He said forget it, nobody‚s going into 7, there’s creaking,
there are noises coming out of there, so we just stopped. And probably about 10
minutes after that, Visconti, he was on West Street, and I guess he had another
report of further damage either in some basements and things like that, so Vis-
conti said nobody goes into 7, so that was the final thing and that was aban-
doned.
Firehouse Magazine: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to
the base of that side?
Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it.
Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many?
There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered through there. It was a huge
hole. I would say it was probably a third of it, right in the middle of it. And
so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we‚ll
head back to the command post.„ƒ Capt. Chris Boyle http://tinyurl.com/e7bzp

"det var ju ingen annan byggnad runt om kring som rasade [förutom WTC7]"

WTC7 fick ju svåra skador av rasmassorna, den hade ett gigantiskt hål på den södra sidan, det brann på nästan alla våningar, och alla runt omkring förstod att den var på väg att rasa, det knakade i byggnaden.

BuckFush wrote:

Gillar du och ta halvsanningar och sen spinna på dem?

BuckFush wrote:
Och VoF, vad är det, Cointelpro, PsyOp?

zpz wrote:
Quote:

BuckFush wrote:

Gillar du och ta halvsanningar och sen spinna på dem?

Nej, jag är inte som du.

zpz wrote:
Quote:

BuckFush wrote:
Och VoF, vad är det, Cointelpro, PsyOp?

En förening med vanliga människor som har lite bättre koll på vetenskapsteori (sånt som har att göra med hur man undersöker om en teori är riktig eller ej) och fakta än genomsnittet här på vaken.

seraphim wrote:
Varför erkänner inte du, zpz, att den officiella historien har blivit slaktad gång på gång, att det bara är en stor lögn alltihopa?

Men ska jag vara ärlig tror jag faktiskt inte du fattar bättre.

zpz wrote:
Quote:

seraphim wrote:
Varför erkänner inte du, zpz, att den officiella historien har blivit slaktad gång på gång, att det bara är en stor lögn alltihopa?

Men ska jag vara ärlig tror jag faktiskt inte du fattar bättre.

Det är det här jag menar, du försöker inte visa att jag har fel när jag avslöjar kemisten som en lögnare, du snackar bara massa skit istället.
Har jag rätt i att kemisten ljög eller ej? Om ja, varför släpper ni inte dessa lögner? Om nej, var har jag fel i min kritik av kemistens påståenden?

Jag visar att denna kemist ljuger och allt man får som respons är allsköns okvädingsord...?