Precis som Meister Eckhart visat på i sin nya bok, "Hur Sverige blev en mångkultur" om vilka som ligger bakom idéerna till dagens Mångkultur i Sverige, avhandlar Professor Mcdonald detta ämne i USA, med samma resultat om vilka som är ansvariga till detta vansinniga projekt.
--------------------------------------------------

Jewish Organizations Behind Illegal Immigration Catastrophe

By Prof Kevin McDonald February 2, 2007

In the case of policy in the Middle East, it is no secret that Jewish organizations were at the forefront of the immigration policy shift implemented by the 1965 Act. Consider the assessment of Vanderbilt University historian Hugh Davis Graham in his book Collision Course: The Strange Convergence of Affirmative Action and Immigration Policy in America

"Most important for the content of immigration reform, the driving force at the core of the movement, reaching back to the 1920s, were Jewish organizations long active in opposing racial and ethnic quotas Following the shock of the Holocaust, Jewish leaders had been especially active in Washington in furthering immigration reform. To the public, the most visible evidence of the immigration reform drive was played by Jewish legislative leaders, such as Representative [Emmanuel] Celler and Senator Jacob Javits of New York. Less visible, but equally important, were the efforts of key advisers on presidential and agency staffs. These included senior policy advisers such as Julius Edelson and Harry Rosenfield in the Truman administration, Maxwell Rabb in the Eisenhower White House, and presidential aide Myer Feldman, assistant secretary of state Abba Schwartz, and deputy attorney general Norbert Schlei in the Kennedy-Johnson administration."(pp. 56­57)

In the past year, there has been much discussion of illegal immigration. It tapped into a very large reservoir of public anger about the lack of control of our borders and, I think, the transformations that immigration is unleashing. The fact that illegal immigration is, after all, illegal made it difficult to keep off the public radar (What part of illegal don't you understand??).

But this contrasts with almost no discussion at all in the Mainstream Media of the question of the 1,000,000 or so legal immigrants that come to the U.S. every year-no discussion of their effect on the economy, social services, crime and competition at elite universities; no discussion of their effect on the long term ethnic composition of the U.S. and the displacement of native populations in various sectors of the economy; and no discussion of whether most Americans really want all of this. (They don't.) The fact that large scale legal immigration causes exactly the same difficulties as large scale illegal inflow is a non-subject.

Those who question the power and influence of the Israel Lobby are quickly labeled anti-Semites. The terms of choice for anyone who thinks the U.S. should have any restrictions at all on immigration are " racist" and "nativist" .

It is exactly the same routine: Media self-censorship, pressure on the media and politicians who stray from official orthodoxy, and intimidation via labeling, anathematizing , and ultimately loss of livelihood.

Of course, there are other issues that fall into the same category of "not fit for public discussion". Perhaps the main one is the role of genetic influences on intelligence and behavior.

But the two issues of Israel and immigration relaxation (in the U.S.) have in common a deep and straightforward Jewish commitment to particular policies. My contention is that both policies have been construed by Jewish leaders as being helpful to the security and political influence of their community.

In the case of Israel, this is self-evident. In the case of immigration policy, there is ample documentation [PDF] of a consistent interest by the Jewish community, both in America and in Europe, in ending the hegemony of the host community amongst whom they live. The measures taken to enforce their chosen objectives suggest there is indeed an element of truth in what Foxman dismisses as "the old canard and conspiracy theory of Jewish control of the media, Congress, and the U.S. government".

I have presented the facts about Jewish influence in both reative immigration and the Middle East elsewhere. This has been extremely unwelcome. And it is not at all surprising that the Jewish community would strenuously resist these conclusions.

Nevertheless, on foreign policy matters what is going on has obviously become increasingly apparent to a lot of smart people with intellectual integrity.

As the incoming 110th Congress starts up, a crucial question will be if this new comprehension will dawn in an area in which, I believe, it is even more critical: America's post-1965

Kevin MacDonald
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin MacDonald [kmacd@csulb.edu] is Professor of Psychology at California State University-Long Beach. For his website, go to http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/

Excerpted from Mr. MacDonald's essay Immigration Policy: Is The Other Boot About To Drop?

Skrämmande läsning .Bennybear har du läst boken "Hur Sverige blev en mångkultur" ? I så fall var den faktabaserad eller var det mycket spekulationer?

hm jag skrev lite om det i en tråd på vaken för ett tag sedan som jag mest baserade på den boken men läs det här iaf

http://tankefrihet.se/forum/index.php ... e4a72c2bc51df&topic=148.0

Ok Maggot så det du skrev var byggt på den boken?Är den att rekomondera?Är den byggd med fakta eller mycket spekulationer?

jo den är bygg på den innehåller mycket fakta den rekomenderas

Så Maggot, har du läst Hizb ut Tahir´s hemsidor ännu? Förr attackerade du den organisation som har en lösning på problemet och är väl medvetna om varför det har blivit som du beskriver.

http://www.hizb.org.uk/hizb/who-is-ht.html

och här har du en film att titta på,
http://video.google.com/videoplay?doc ... o=0&type=search&plindex=9

Varför ska du alltid dra upp dessa ?
Jag tycker inte de utstrålar någon värme direkt snubben på framsidan ser ju allmänt galen ut.

Denna rörelse tog över en skola i köpenhamn och sen såg de till att barnen inte fick fick rita eller dansa, och att pojkar
och flickor inte fick leka ihop.

Nationalsocialistik Front tar även dom upp dessa frågor på ett bra sätt men det är oxå en organisation/parti som jag inte tycker utstrålar någon värme utan en fanatisk övertyggelse med uniformer likt den!

Varför snackar du så mycket om denna rörelse ?
Stödjer du den ekonomisk eller något sånt ?

Sedan undrar jag varför deras flagga är svart och inte grön eftersom grön är islams färg ?

Jag tar upp denna rörelse eftersom de har mycke faktan som många gånger inte tas upp i t.ex. amerikanske konspirationsfilmer.

Helt enkelt en rekomendation till dig och alla andra på detta forum.

Jag har inget emot arabiska lösningar i arabiska länder. Filmen var faktiskt intressant.

Kul att du tittade på den Al-CIAda,

här är del två om du inte redan har hittat den:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3522242149610281527

Jag kommer att göra så fast du får vänta till söndag.

Appropå invandring hehehe kolla vad som händer bakom ryggen på Bush...hahahahahaha http://www.jibjab.com/view/34678

Gaston det var kul!

Ok Dan de tar säkert upp en massa bra saker