This blog is full of useful info.



http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-clf4ZO ... 0EAuyvsj2qK4E-?cq=1&p=662


A Contrail Is Not A ChemTrail
ChemTrails are not the same as normal, everyday aerial contrails; there is a definite observable difference in both the formation and behavior of these two similar phenomena, which clearly distinguishes one from the other.

Normal contrails are composed of fragile ice crystals formed by aircraft flying at altitudes of 31,000 feet or greater. At altitudes below 31,000 feet, these normal vapor condensation trails are simply not able to form behind an aircraft, regardless of its type or design. Above 31,000 feet, normal contrails appear pencil-thin in construction when observed from ground level, and in nearly all instances, tend to totally evaporate within a minute or so, rarely extending for any appreciable distance behind the emitting aircraft.

ChemTrails on the other hand, have been observed being generated by aircraft flying at altitudes as high as 33,000 feet and as low as 8,000 feet—but generally, below 30,000 feet. Since normal contrails can not form at these low altitudes, any contrail formation that is observed at these elevations is probably not a contrail at all, but a genuine ChemTrail.

These normally manifest as billowy smoke trails when viewed from the ground, and tend to always become broader and denser over time. They generally do not evaporate, nor do they dissipate at all. Over a period of several hours, parallel ChemTrail formations will eventually spread out to meet one another and join together to form a continuous, banded, cirrus-like cloud formation in the sky. Often a fish-spine configuration will be observed after a given ChemTrail has had sufficient time to mature. Shortly after this joining-up phase, what just hours earlier was a perfectly clear blue sky, will now appear as a structured, milky-haze overcast, unnatural in all respects.

Another distinguishing difference between contrails and ChemTrails concerns their relative location or position in the local sky, as well as their directional characteristics.

Aircraft emitting normal contrails are constrained by FAA regulations to operate only over designated air routes; therefore, the contrails that they generate will be found consistently only within local flight corridors, which are easily discerned by an observer at any given geographic location on the ground. In addition, air traffic along these designated routes is always unidirectional. Aircraft flying in opposing compass directions are never permitted to use the same air-routes, at the same altitudes—for obvious reasons. Therefore, only those contrails that are formed within these restricted air corridors, and consistently with the same vector or direction should be considered normal contrails resulting from normal commercial airline traffic.

There is one exception to this rule however. Occasionally, normal contrails will be emitted by military air traffic, which do not always operate within these flight corridor constraints. This deviation is due to the fact that the military is generally exempt from commercial flight regulations during air maneuvers and training exercises—but again, this is the exception and not the rule.

Aircraft that generate ChemTrails are apparently not constrained to operate within FAA designated air corridors either; nor are they required to adhere to established commercial flight rules and FAA regulations. Consequently, ChemTrail patterns will be observed lying both within and well outside of the normal air corridors used by the commercial airlines. Unlike normal contrails, these lattice formations can and do appear at any location in the local sky, develop in any geographic direction or vector, intersect and intercept one another as a matter of practice, and produce elaborate and extensive cross-hatch or geometric patterns, which are often seen extending from horizon to horizon. Any commercial airliner that attempted to engage in these kinds of flight maneuvers would be guilty of violating just about every known international flight regulation of commercial aviation. The ChemTrail patterns laid-down by these regulation-exempt aircraft, generally appear as either long parallel billowing furrows in the sky, as some variant of an intersecting tic-tac-toe configuration or a simple figure X.It is believed that these clearly discernible geometric patterns are used as a means of identifying specific local ChemTrail formations, and facilitate the tracking of their position, movement, and drift using satellite telemetry. This information would be vital if it were necessary to determine critical operational values for the various mission parameters needed to accurately position these lattice-type networks, so as to target selected geographic locations and populations with their fallout.

Another very subtle parameter associated with ChemTrail phenomena is the significance of the local surface wind speed over the dispersion area. Empirically, ChemTrail missions tend to be suspended wherever and whenever the ground wind speed reaches or exceeds 20 miles per hour. This characteristic has been a consistent limiting factor throughout the range of areas where ChemTrail activity has been observed. Normal contrail activity is never subject to this restriction, and can be seen over a wide range of measured surface wind velocities.

http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-clf4ZO ... 0EAuyvsj2qK4E-?cq=1&p=662

ingen fara nasa har förklarat att det där är bara en ihärdig kondensstrimma haha

Men gaston, du har ju kommit fram till att det är vanliga kommersiella passagerarflyg som sprider "chemtrails", det stämmer inte med texten du postade där.

Ruben: sorry att jag är lite lat, men kan du posta den länken till NASA?

De borde ju veta bäst, de har ju mest pengar av alla. Så om deras claim visar sig fallera på en enda punkt så är Chemtrails verkligen hårt bevisat.

Quote:

Det utesluter ingenting........

Quote:
Nej, det vore en felaktig logisk slutledning.
Quote:
http://www.theskepticsguide.org/logicalfallacies.asp

Här är länkar till NASA i ämnet:
http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/GLOBE/science.html
http://asd-www.larc.nasa.gov/SCOOL/contrails.html
http://www-pm.larc.nasa.gov/
http://enso.larc.nasa.gov/sass/contra ... /contrail_prediction.html

Vet inte om NASA har så jävla mkt pengar när allt kommer omkring, eller så har dom mkt pengar men använder det till svarta projekt och dylikt! För om NASA hade så mkt pengar så skulle dom väl inte behöva flyga till rymden med en +20årig skrothög..?

NRO kanske är den myndighet som får största delen av NASAs budgeterade pengar?
Ska nog skaffa Richard Hoaglands senaste bok, ( Dark Mission ) det kan nog finnas en hel del intressant info i den om NASA och NRO..

http://www.weatherwars.info/


Respect

void, zpz2 posterade länken

TeBe, du är inne på något viktigt här. Det i sig ger också ett svar, inget jag vill utveckla här.

Rub

ZPZ: "Nej, det vore en felaktig logisk slutledning."

Jo, slarvigt av mig. Det är inte bevisat, men det är tydligt att NASA ljuger om deras förklaring fallerar på en liten punkt. Med deras resurser så borde ju inte misstag kunna göras.

Det tråkiga är dock att du kanske "sitter fast" i vänster hjärnhalva, för jag tror inte den är connected med den högra speciellt mycket. Eller iafall inte i den bemärkelsen som normal hjärnfunktion ska uppvisa. Vad nu normalt är, med tanke på att vaccinering har pågått ganska länge nu och även över flera generationer tyvärr.

Det visar dina inlägg under de senaste året, åren. Du har förmågan att göra "fyrkantiga" matematiska/statistiska analyser av saker. Du summerar och sätter ihop. Dock missas mycket i detta datorliknande tänkande. För att kunna se större samband måste även höger hjärnhalva vara connected och kommunicerande med vänster.

Ska vi lägga upp lite cash du och jag, och så gör vi varsin Catscan, eller annan fotografering av hjärnan som finns tillgänglig, för att se hur olika centran är aktiva/inaktiva beroende på den handling eller process som utförs för stunden.

Ta inte inlägget som en diss eller attack, det är inte mitt syfte alls.

void, jag skrev en grej i din gästbok