Quote:

Hur går det med dina tomma kapslar som skall skicka inspelade radio och TV signaler???

Glömde du dom???

Quote:

Så det var därför dom tog upp basalt????

Läge att läsa på lite igen??????

Basalt (pronounced /ˈbæsɒlt, bəˈsɔːlt/) is a common gray to black extrusive volcanic rock.

Den som vill kan läsa igenom dessa.

Quote:

De säger inte med ett ord vulkan.
Det har inte funnits vulkaner på månen, som den är nu.

Quote:

Ja, va intressant med mera "fakta" från dig.
Fast nu skall du ha ett plus i kanten, inga sagor och inga fantasier denna gång.
För du har inte skickat med något nu heller av relevanta påståenden. Men det blev ju inte några tokiga inlägg heller eftersom det är TOMT.

Quote:

INGEN mer än du påstår att NASA eller andra skall ha hittat ett berg likt vesuvius. NASA, andra forskare och jag har klart och tydligt att när det förekom vulkanisk aktivitet på månen så är det inte som på jorden.

BASALT är en vulkanisk sort av sten. Trolla bort det fakta du!!! Hur går det med lögnen du har kvar då?

Från DIN länk till NASA.
"made of basaltic volcanic"

Du vet vad volcanic betyder va????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

The Van Allen belts seals the deal
but for the non believers of the Hoax
the small video clip you are referring to is a clear as to the distance and the 2nd voice telling them to talk to MC is Damming.

Also apparently there are only 30 photos of all the Missions - and recently 1300 hours of Tapes are Missing.
http://www.rawstory.com/showarticle.p ... icas%2Farticle1218885.ece

Then there is lighting and the cross hairs and lack of stars, and Stanley Kubricks involvement

and US was 10 years behind the soviets in space exploration

and it will take us 25 years to get to the moon now

and nasa is reviewing how the old technology worked cause they are trying to figure out how we got to the moon the first time.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060814/ap_on_sc/nasa_looking_back

but to me the guy who quit the day before the launch seals the deal. Why would you quit nasa the day before the biggest event of your lifetime. That is just strange.

...

By the way in the docu
"Dark Side of the Moon"
where Henry Kissinger and Donald Rumsfeld are making fun of conspiracy theories about moon,
at the end of credits you will find

"No goy was mistreated during producing of this movie"

What do you think of that?

...

As I got older,the one thing always in my mind was.......Can You hear me Now! As in Cell phone communication. How did they communicate in real time,when you could barley do it a few years ago , and in some areas today?

...

it's also funny, how no engines can be heard during landing maneuver.

Since supposingly there's no atmosphere on the moon the engines had to use enormous amount of fuel to counteract the gravity.

even if we assume they had that much fuel (although its highly questionable when you look at the size of the module ), how come we don't hear the engines AT ALL?

...

haha... quilty...

synd om dem tycker jag.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RcKLAo62Ro


have a problem with this photo, I am not saying the photo is/isn't "photoshopped" or fake, just offering a probable explanation.

It is pointed out that there are no tracks from the tires, but plenty of footprints, perhaps this is because they took it off the landing rig and set it down, thus making a lot of footprints (it couldnt have been that heavy, plus gravity is weaker on the moon), this may be the first photo of the car on the moon and hadn't been driven yet. If it was filmed on a set on Earth they would probably just roll it out onto the dust and take the photo, the tracks wouldn't have been a problem since they were supposed to be driving it around anyway. It seems extremely silly to me that NASA would go through the trouble of covering up or avoiding making tire tracks, let alone just "forget".





...

Eric Hufschmid's artices on Apollo 11 convinced me that we never landed men on the moon.

http://www.erichufschmid.net/Science_Challenge_24.html

http://members.aol.com/painfulquestions/ApolloMoonHoax.pdf

http://members.aol.com/painfulquestions/ScienceChallenge24.pdf

...


I'm telling you guys,
best way to make people think is to point em at official story

- show em that Apollo missions officially sent manned craft 10 times to moon orbit and 10 times successfully returned back in span of 3 and half years


- compare with achievements today and technological difference...

....

.... all intelligence communities are interconnected in our current new world order, [and have been for over 2 centuries] They have an unspoken agreement not to rat out each others black ops, propaganda and corruption.

u.s.a. intelligence knows all kinds of dirt on foreign governments, but you don't hear them speaking out either

just becuase you repeat a lie, doesn't make it true

honor and integrity will prevail...

...

Ok, låt oss anta att Buzz Aldrin är trovärdig,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlkV1ybBnHI
i sådana fall, vad såg han för något i filmen enligt honom själv?

Så välj mellan UFO eller flyga till månen.

v0off v0off v0off

Bok:

Who Built the Moon? - by Chris Knight and Alan Butler

"...I find it amusing that Sci-fi and NASA has us believing that thrust can exist in the vacuum of space. Anyone that could create or manipulate such a massive structure would likely have control of gravity. Infact; I've wondered if the theory of gravity is all wrong. Yes; the moon appears to affect the tides, and may also contain a gravitational generator?"

Åter, håll i VoF-hattarna:


The moon is the Rosetta stone of the planets." —Robert Jastrow,
First Chairman, NASA Lunar Exploration Committee
---

STRANGE MOON FACTS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Compiled by Ronald Regehr

The moon is the Rosetta stone of the planets." —Robert Jastrow,
First Chairman, NASA Lunar Exploration Committee

After hundreds of years of detailed observation and study, our closest companion in the vast universe, Earth’s moon, remains an enigma. Six moon landings and hundreds of experiments have resulted in more questions being asked than answered. Among them:

1. Moon’s Age: The moon is far older than previously expected. Maybe even older than the Earth or the Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.

2. Rock’s Origin: The chemical composition of the dust upon which the rocks sat differed remarkably from the rocks themselves, contrary to accepted theories that the dust resulted from weathering and breakup of the rocks themselves. The rocks had to have come from somewhere else.

3. Heavier Elements on Surface: Normal planetary composition results in heavier elements in the core and lighter materials at the surface; not so with the moon. According to Wilson, "The abundance of refractory elements like titanium in the surface areas is so pronounced that several geologists proposed the refractory compounds were brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some unknown way. They don’t know how, but that it was done cannot be questioned." (Emphasis added).

4. Water Vapor: On March 7, 1971, lunar instruments placed by the astronauts recorded a vapor cloud of water passing across the surface of the moon. The cloud lasted 14 hours and covered an area of about 100 square miles.

5. Magnetic Rocks: Moon rocks were magnetized. This is odd because there is no magnetic field on the moon itself. This could not have originated from a "close call" with Earth—such an encounter would have ripped the moon apart.

6. No Volcanoes: Some of the moon’s craters originated internally, yet there is no indication that the moon was ever hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions.

7. Moon Mascons: Mascons, which are large, dense, circular masses lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centers of the moon’s maria, "are broad, disk-shaped objects that could be possibly some kind of artificial construction. For huge circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered like bull’s-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident." (Emphasis added).

8. Seismic Activity: Hundreds of "moonquakes" are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. In November, 1958, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory photographed a gaseous eruption of the moon near the crater Alphonsus. He also detected a reddish glow that lasted for about an hour. In 1963, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in the Aristarchus region. These observations have proved to be precisely identical and periodical, repeating themselves as the moon moves closer to the Earth. These are probably not natural phenomena.

9. Hollow Moon: The moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) whereas the Earth’s is 5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, "If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere." Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside the moon where is "simply a cavity." MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, "the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon’s gravitational field . . . indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow." In Carl Sagan’s treatise, Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, "A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object."

10. Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash onto the moon. The LM’s impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site) created an artificial moonquake with startling characteristics—the moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour. This phenomenon was repeated with Apollo 13 (intentionally commanding the third stage to impact the moon), with even more startling results. Seismic instruments recorded that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes and traveled to a depth of twenty-five miles, leading to the conclusion that the moon has an unusually light—or even no—core.

11. Unusual Metals: The moon’s crust is much harder than presumed. Remember the extreme difficulty the astronauts encountered when they tried to drill into the maria? Surprise! The maria is composed primarily illeminite, a mineral containing large amounts of titanium, the same metal used to fabricate the hulls of deep-diving submarines and the skin of the SR-71 "Blackbird". Uranium 236 and neptunium 237 (elements not found in nature on Earth) were discovered in lunar rocks, as were rustproof iron particles.

12. Moon’s Origin: Before the astronauts’ moon rocks conclusively disproved the theory, the moon was believed to have originated when a chunk of Earth broke off eons ago (who knows from where?). Another theory was that the moon was created from leftover "space dust" remaining after the Earth was created. Analysis of the composition of moon rocks disproved this theory also. Another popular theory is that the moon was somehow "captured" by the Earth’s gravitational attraction. But no evidence exists to support this theory. Isaac Asimov, stated, "It’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and the moon then having taken up nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible."

13. Weird Orbit: Our moon is the only moon in the solar system that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. Stranger still, the moon’s center of mass is about 6000 feet closer to the Earth than its geometric center (which should cause wobbling), but the moon’s bulge is on the far side of the moon, away from the Earth. "Something" had to put the moon in orbit with its precise altitude, course, and speed.

14. Moon Diameter: How does one explain the "coincidence" that the moon is just the right distance, coupled with just the right diameter, to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? Again, Isaac Asimov responds, "There is no astronomical reason why the moon and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion."

15. Spaceship Moon: As outrageous as the Moon-Is-a-Spaceship Theory is, all of the above items are resolved if one assumes that the moon is a gigantic extraterrestrial craft, brought here eons ago by intelligent beings. This is the only theory that is supported by all of the data, and there are no data that contradict this theory.

Greek authors Aristotle and Plutarch, and Roman authors Apolllonius Rhodius and Ovid all wrote of a group of people called the Proselenes who lived in the central mountainous area of Greece called Arcadia The Proselenes claimed title to this area because their forebears were there "before there was a moon in the heavens." This claim is substantiated by symbols on the wall of the Courtyard of Kalasasaya, near the city of Tiahuanaco, Bolivia, which record that the moon came into orbit around the Earth between 11,500 and 13, 000 years ago, long before recorded history.

1. Ages of Flashes: Aristarchus, Plato, Eratosthenes, Biela, Rabbi Levi, and Posidonius all reported anomalous lights on the moon. NASA, one year before the first lunar landing, reported 570+ lights and flashes were observed on the moon from 1540 to 1967.

2. Operation Moon Blink: NASA’s Operation Moon Blink detected 28 lunar events in a relatively short period of time.

3. Lunar Bridge: On July 29, 1953, John J. O’Neill observed a 12-mile-long bridge straddling the crater Mare Crisium. In August, British astronomer Dr. H.P. Wilkens verified its presence, "It looks artificial. It’s almost incredible that such a thing could have been formed in the first instance, or if it was formed, could have lasted during the ages in which the moon has been in existence.

4. The Shard: The Shard, an obelisk-shaped object that towers 1½ miles from the Ukert area of the moon’s surface, was discovered by Orbiter 3 in 1968. Dr. Bruce Cornet, who studied the amazing photographs, stated, "No known natural process can explain such a structure."

5. The Tower: One of the most curious features ever photographed on the Lunar surface (Lunar Orbiter photograph III-84M) is an amazing spire that rises more than 5 miles from the Sinus Medii region of the lunar surface.

6. The Obelisks: Lunar Orbiter II took several photographs in November 1966 that showed several obelisks, one of which was more than 150 feet tall. ". . . the spires were arranged in precisely the same was as the apices of the three great pyramids."

Don Ecker, Long Saga of Lunar Anomalies, UFO magazine, Vol. 10, Nol 2 (March/April 1995), p. 23.
Ibid., p. 24
Ibid.
Six Mysterious Statuesque Shadows Photographed on the Moon by Orbiter, The Washington Post, Nov. 22, 1966, p. 1.

The Book "Penetration" by Ingo Swann
*EVERYONE* should download and read the following book by Ingo Swann, the "father" of remote viewing :

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=XPZR1MXP

Just type in the code in the upper right hand corner and (the text) is yours.
However, since the book is going for (at the bare minimum) $500 and up, the very important sketches are not available.

It takes into account everything you could possibly think of with regard to this topic.

Är Robert Jastrow en lögnare han också Lizzard?



The moon is the Rosetta stone of the planets." —Robert Jastrow,
First Chairman, NASA Lunar Exploration Committee


Quote:

quilty...

synd om dem tycker jag.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RcKLAo62Ro

zzz, är de tre herrarna i videon väldigt glada och stolta, eller lider dom?

Det här forumet är bra humoristiskt ibland... "månen är ihålig", tänk vilken fantasi folk har.

Man behöver bara räkna lite snabbt på densitetet för att se hur galet det skulle bli.

Månen har en volym på
2.1958 * 10^19 m³
och en massa av
7.3477 * 10^22 kg

Om vi antar att månen är homogen så blir densiteten
(7.3477 * 10^22 kg) / (2.1958 * 10^19 m³) = 3346 kg/m³

Lite drygt tre ton per kubikmeter alltså, eller 3 kg per liter, eller 3 g/cm³. Låter hyfsat rimligt, inte sant?

Sen tar vi och räknar på att den är ihåligt, jag vet inte hur tjock du tror att den här, men låt oss anta 1 km tjockt, det får väl anses vara hyfsat tjockt?
Ytan är 3.793 * 10^7 km² så om det är ett 1 km tjockt skal får skalet en volym på ungefär
3.793 * 10^7 km² * 1 km = 3.793 * 10^7 km³ = 3.793 * 10^16 m³

Vad blir då densiteten?
(7.3477 * 10^22 kg) / (3.793 * 10^16 m³) = 1.937 * 10^6 kg/m³
eller 1937 kg per liter, eller 1937 g/cm³
Vad fan är det för material som väger så mycket???

Jämför det med guld eller volfram (tungsten) som väger ca 19 g/cm³. Osmium ca 22,6 g/cm³
Men vi måste ha 100 gånger så hög densitet!!!
http://www.lenntech.com/Periodic-chart-elements/density.htm

Och om du nu tänker ifrågasätta att min siffra på månens massa är korrekt så tänk på att den är mycket lätt att uppskatta genom att mäta dess gravitation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon

Quote:

Jag är personligen inte så intresserad av alla siffror hit och dit, men gott jobbat i alla fall.

Det där med att veta dess vikt genom att mäta dess gravitation så tror jag inte på det.

Metals Whose Existence is Impossible

It is not strange that the moon craters have a great deal of lava. What is strange is that the lava contains rich metal elements such as titanium, chromium, yttrium, etc., which are rarely found on earth. Those metals are all very hard and resistant to both high temperatures and corrosion. Scientists estimate that it requires 2000-3000º C to melt these metals. But the moon has been a dead and cold orb without volcanic activity for three billion years. How did the moon generate so many kinds of metals that require such high temperatures to melt? Moreover, analysis of the 380 kg of moon soil samples brought back by astronauts shows that there is pure iron and pure titanium. Such pure metal deposits just aren't found under natural conditions.

What do the unexplainable facts tell us? They have undoubtedly demonstrated that these metal elements were not formed under natural conditions, but were extracted. Then the questions is by whom and when?

Quote:

Hur vet du då din egen vikt?

Din egen vikt är mätt med samma fysik som man mätt månens vikt alltså gravitation.

Du får numer sluta tro på badrumsvågar om du hävdar att mätningar av månens vikt via gravitation är fel.

Texten i posten ovanför är från denna artikel, som jag postat några gånger tidigare:

Moon, Where Are You From?

http://www.pureinsight.org/pi/index.php?news=976

Quote:
Gravitationskraften mellan två kroppar kan beräknas som produkten av deras massor dividerat med avståndet i kvadrat, multiplicerat med en konstant.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton%2 ... _of_universal_gravitation

Den hastighet man måste ha för att stanna kvar i en cirkulär omloppsbana på en viss höjd från en viss celest kropp är bestämd av kroppens massa.
Alltså, genom skicka en sond i omloppsbana runt månen och mäta åtminstone två av de tre variablerna omloppstid, höjd resp. hastighet i en viss bana, så kan man ta fram en god approximation på månens massa. Det är alltså mycket lätt att räkna ut en ungefärlig massa genom att skicka en sond till omloppsbana kring månen, mycket mycket lättare än att knacka på månens yta och försöka avgöra om den är ihålig på basis av resonansen. Att bestämma massan är busenkelt i sammanhanget.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_speed

Du kanske känner till begreppet geostationär bana, en omloppsbana runt jorden där man har samma hastighet runt jorden som jorden roterar med, så att man befinner sig över samma punkt på jordytan hela tiden. Vilken höjd denna ligger på kan direkt räknas ut utifrån konstanterna jordens massa, jordens rotationshastighet, och gravitationskonstanten.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostationary_orbit

Det är lika enkelt när det gäller månen och alla celesta kroppar.

Quote:

Sidan innehåller bara en massa felaktigheter.

Ta t.ex. detta

It is not strange that the moon craters have a great deal of lava. What is strange is that the lava contains rich metal elements such as titanium, chromium, yttrium, etc., which are rarely found on earth. Those metals are all very hard and resistant to both high temperatures and corrosion. Scientists estimate that it requires 2000-3000º C to melt these metals.

Detta är rent strunt. Grundämnen finns på en planet eller måne oberoende om något smält eller inte. Vulkaner skapar inga grundämnen.

Om den som skrivit artikeln inte sovit under grundskolans fysik och kemi utan lärt sig elementär fyik och kemi skulle artikels trovärdighet ha öka mångfaldigt.

De flesta ovanliga metaller på månen kommer från allt som kraschat på månen som meteorer och asteroider och dessa orsakade vulkanutbrott.

Quote:

Jag tror inte alls på det där.

It has been found that asteroids and meteors not only create shallow craters on the Moon's surface but produce a convex floor to the crater instead of concave as expected, supporting the idea of a rigid shell. Countless other pieces of evidence from astronomers and NASA scientists began to reveal that some 2-3 miles down there appear to be dense layers of metal---which would explain why the craters were convex. But the most astonishing conclusion is that the only theory which can completely explain all the anomalies is that the Moon is hollow with a shell about 20 miles thick---mostly metal. Note that mascons (higher concentrations of mass) found in the marias cause fluctuations in gravity and have never been satisfactorily explained.

Moreover, these structural anomalies were supported by two publications, one Time Magazine, which unwittingly revealed the gravity value of the Moon relative to Earth by publishing the distance from Earth to Moon of the null point between them, indicating a gravitational force some 60 -70 % of Earth. Furthermore, some people noticed the feeble plumage of the rocket exhaust as the module rose from the Moon's surface---explained away by NASA as due to the vacuum.

[...]

The covert government have long since sent 'astronauts' into outer space in antigravity spacecrafts. They apparently had the so-called cosmospheres about 40 years ago, some larger than the old and massive dirigibles. They seized the antigravity research data from the Nazis, and have since then reverse-engineered captured spacecrafts and negotiated deals with aliens involving antigravity technologies.

The more thorough have been the investigations of the Moon the more bizarre the results have been. Probably one of the most startling was that moonquakes occurred like clockwork. Moreover, the fluctuations on each occasion were the same. This is impossible for natural conditions which always obey fractal distributions. Furthermore, a study of rock samples reveal an age of 5.3 billion years, and that not only is the Moon older than the Earth, estimated to be about 4.6 billion years, but that it is older than the solar system (and by theoretical standards as old as the universe).

What about the surface of the Moon? Several television viewers wrote explaining that they spotted one of the astronauts pick up what appeared to be a glass bottle and remark, 'My God, I don't believe it, look at this . .. ' Then the television screen went blank. Other viewers observed the extreme difficulty astronauts had when drilling down a few inches into the Moon's marias and that when the drill bit was pulled out, metal shavings were visible. Rocks were found to contain brass, mica, titanium, and elements uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 not previously found in nature.

Scientific experts, including NASA investigators believe that the Moon is hollow---it is the only explanation. The velocity of sound has been found to increase with depth and at 40 miles it is too fast for the speed of propagation through rock substance. 'Spaceship Moon' is the brainchild of the two Soviet researchers but many others agree with the theory, including NASA scientists at JPL and an Oxford University physicist. The capture theory is now back in favour but with a significant adjustment that the Moon was steered into orbit.

In fact, if we include relevant data from extraterrestrial material transmitted by Ashayana Deane (see other articles for more information on this source) taken from a now vast body of advanced scientific knowledge about the universe, life and man's downfall, it is made clear that the Moon is another of the many components of the Beast machine (see Cosmic Map article), and does indeed play a sinister role. The natural matter of the Moon came from a very large planet, Maldek (or Marduk), which orbited our Sun thousands of years ago between Mars and Jupiter. It was inhabited by a thriving civilisation which degenerated to such a degree that the planet was destroyed. The asteroid belt is a product of the many fragments; also Wormwood (Bible), referred to as Battlestar Wormwood by ETs (see Planet X article).

We can tentatively assume now that the Moon consists of a metallic framework which has been packed by pieces from Maldek, forming the spherical shape but is essentially hollow. Similarly for Wormwood. Thus the Moon contains energies and coding (frequency patterns) supporting the original ET agenda for assimilation of our planetary system and in fact the whole time matrix. Further programmes emanate from the moon, such as one to cause unnatural hormonal/menstrual cycles in women to produce more children---thus losing control over when to have children. The purpose being to keep a plentiful stock of DNA for their genetic experiments (the human DNA, that is, its original template is valuable to these spiritually-fallen ETs).

In fact, not only does the Moon affect the tides of Earth but the blood in living organisms. A separate source of information (channelling) refers to the Moon as being an electromagnetic computer which can be programmed intelligently, such as to influence the feminine cycle (as also mentioned above in the Deane material), and has been transmitting signals to maintain our DNA for aeons.

Från:
http://www.zephnet.com/?select=squib& ... =60145&docket=1&linkoff=3

Quote:

Tro...

Quote:
Det är inte en fråga om tro för sjutton! Det är en fundamental skillnad mellan vetenskap och religion som du inte verkar ha greppat. "Tror" man inte på en vetenskaplig teori så är det bara att göra ett experiment som falsifierar den, för vetenskapliga teorier är utformade på så vis att de kan falsifieras om de är falska (det är ett krav för att klassas som vetenskapliga). (Newtons teori har t.ex. egentligen falsifierats genom att man uppmätte en oförklarad perihelieförskutning på Merkurius och ersattes av Einsteins teori som kunde förklara den, men för nästan alla praktiska ändamål fungerar Newtons teori tillräckligt väl.)

Dessa vetenskapliga teorier som vi har om celest mekanik har via alla observationer visat sig beskriva verkligheten på ett mycket bra sätt. Om du säger att du inte tror på att en sten ramlar till marken om du släpper den så spelar det ingen roll, det är ett vetenskapligt konstaterat faktum att den gör det enligt gravitationens lagar.

Tror du alltså inte på att en satellit måste befinna sig på ca 35786 km höjd över ekvatorn för att hålla sig i en geostationär bana?
Tråkigt för dig då, för det vet alla som håller på med astronomi och satelliter att det förhåller sig på det viset. Försök komma med något som visar på motsatsen, dvs försök falsifiera teorin.