http://www.fmotl.com/LR.htm

What, exactly, is Lawful Rebellion?



While, on the one hand, the sterling efforts of the UK Column (and many others) to expose the insidious corruptions of Common Purpose and paedophilia are to be thoroughly commended, the answer (the antidote) does not lie in mere exposure.

For the simple reason that exposure is one thing, but 'connection to day-to-day activities' is another, and considerably more complex.

(This all being a part of 'their' plan, of course. To create a complexity that is very difficult to see and to unravel).

What is necessary, in practice, are 'stonewalls' against all of this. Practical stonewalls, or (to use the Internet idiom) 'firewalls'.

Well, that's Lawful Rebellion.

Behind a firewall of Lawful Rebellion, it matters not one iota how corrupt the Monarch or Parliament are. Or whether the European Union even exists. Or whether Common Purpose exists. Or whether there are paedophiles around. And so on. For the simple reason that you have placed yourself, your family, and your friends, behind a firewall.

All that is necessary is for each and every decent person to construct their own firewall, and every DECENT person is safe against anything but Nuclear Attack.

So what, exactly, IS Lawful Rebellion?

Well, it's really very, very simple. Fundamentally a Mindset, based on plain Common Sense and reason.

The Mindset is: Not to be afraid on anyone.

Because everyone is equal.

Which is very easy to say, of course. But what about the 'doing' part?

Well, that's actually nothing like as hard as it sounds. All it takes is some basic understanding about the facts of life.

1. The understanding that the Common Law is the bedrock on which all civilisation is built, simply because it IS 'civilisation', i.e. 'civilised and honourable behaviour'. And that's all it is. Therefore, if you understand 'civilised behaviour', then you understand the Common Law. And, if you understand the Common Law (civilised behaviour), all you need to do is to lock your Mindset to it.

Once your Mindset is locked into civilised behaviour, everything you see around you becomes clearly defined. You are readily capable of detecting UNcivilised behaviour, and thus able to immediately raise up the firewall to block it.

2. The firewall consists, in practice, of nothing more than sensible, civilised, and reasonable questions. And these questions come simply from your understanding of what 'civilised behaviour' means.

ANYTHING and EVERYTHING that is UNcivilised is capable of being questioned. For the simple reason that you know the questions will NOT be answerable by yardsticks derived from truth, decency and honesty, etc.

3. And this method has very distinct advantages. In-built into the system of corruption (we are all up against) MUST BE the fact that those who unwittingly perpetrate it, MUST NEVER realise they are doing so. The systems of corruption indoctrinate and ingrain so thoroughly that millions grow up not realising that they are being mind-molded into UNcivilised behaviour.

In short, when you ask such people reasonable, sensible, down-to-earth, very simple questions ... THEY ARE IMMEDIATELY ALL AT SEA! They are simply stunned for an answer. Because it does not compute with their indoctrinated Mindset. Their basic reaction is simply to push the problem higher up the 'chain of command', and forget about it as soon as possible. This doesn't help because those higher up the chain of command are similarly indoctrinated, and have no more idea than those 'below'. The net result is that they steamroll on (not one of them knowing what else to do). They steamroll on, that is, UNTIL THEIR SHIP EVENTUALLY COLLIDES WITH THE HARBOUR WALL. The 'harbour wall' being your sensible, decent, unanswerable questions. At this point they are not only all at sea, but seriously torpedoed, bailing out like dervishes, and sinking fast.

And those are the levers you can use to built your firewall.

In short, therefore, Lawful Rebellion is simply chucking as many spanners as possible into the works. The 'spanners' simply being reasonable (fundamentally unanswerable) questions.

If there were no corruption, if everyone and everything were acting decently and honestly in the first place, then those questions would not need to be asked. They would not be necessary, and would simply not apply.

Thus the whole situation is 'self-correcting'.

As far as the questions are concerned: Make them up. Make them up as you go along. You'll know (in your heart) what's wrong, and you'll also know (in your heart) what's right.

It's all, in general, based on 'authority'. And the fact that, in order for another to have any authority over you, YOU MUST EXTEND IT TO THEM. You must make the conscious (or sub-conscious) effort to bend to their will, and suppress your own will. SO JUST DON'T DO THAT. Don't 'bend' to their will. Cling, like a crab, to your own free will.

So the first question to ask is: "What is your authority to place that demand on me? Where does your authority come from? Where and when did I, of my own free will, and not under duress or deception, promise any obligation to you? Where is it? Show me some documented proof"

Things that were raging 'red hot', suddenly go very cold when such questions are asked.

That's basically where it starts, and that's Lawful Rebellion. And these questions apply to Courts, Police, Local Authorities ... indeed EVERYONE.

The vast majority of Lawful Rebellion takes the form of correspondence, and does not ever become 'physical'. However, there are instances where "the steamroller" gets to 'physical' e.g. Bailiffs on the doorstep. (Maybe even accompanied by Policymen).

So, perhaps, the ultimate thing to remember is this: Common Assault is a CRIME. Punishable by a prison sentence. And Common Assault is defined as ANYTHING THAT MAY CAUSE YOU TO FEEL UNLAWFULLY THREATENED. It does NOT have to be 'physical'. It can be PURELY 'mental'.

Thus, when approached in any kind of threatening manner, when they have no authority or jurisdiction to do so, YOU ARE BEING ASSAULTED. And whoever is approaching you is COMMITTING A CRIME.

SUCH AN APPROACH IS "THE MENACE OF", "A TRESPASS UPON", THE SOVEREIGNTY OF YOUR PERSON.

AND YOU SHOULD HAVE NO HESITATION IN SAYING SO ... NO MATTER WHO IS APPROACHING YOU, AND WHETHER OR NOT HE/SHE IS WEARING BLUE CLOTH, WITH MASONIC REGALIA ATTACHED.

Use a commanding voice:

"HOLD IT RIGHT THERE, BRO'! Take one more step and the sky could easily fall in on you, because I'll have you for Common Assault! In front of witnesses. So, before taking that one more step, find out whether or not I can do that! I assure you I can, and will. Because I know the Law-of-the-Land ... even if you apparently don't!

You need some jurisdiction over me before I'm not able to report you for trespass. So, let's discuss your jurisdiction, shall we? Before you end up behind bars? That would be the best idea, don't you think?

I know you feel pretty safe behind that uniform. But that's only because very few people understand the Law and their Rights. And I'm not in that category. I know my Rights, and I know yours - even if you don't.

Now, have I caused injury or loss to anyone? No? Have I breached the peace? No? Have I been devious in my promises and agreements? No? In that case you are way outside your jurisdiction, and came very close to CRIMINAL TRESPASS.

So back off ... now ... and stay there.

Your so-called authority is a House of Cards, built on sand. And it is obviously long past time you realised that.

Right. Now. Before we go any further, show me documented proof of your authority and jurisdiction, and let's discuss its limitations. Because there are very many of them.

Did you take an Oath of Service, in order to wear that uniform in public? Was it solemn? We can start from there. Repeat it for me, please ..."

You will be standing in front of a QUITE PERPLEXED (and possibly slightly bemused) Policyman. (Quite possibly back-pedalling like mad).

It just takes 'bottle'. Which comes from the knowledge that you have RIGHT ON YOUR SIDE (and a mouth with which to express your Rights ... changing tones of voice appropriately)

(This information is based on the practical experiences of various people. Show any kind of 'fear', and you are done for. You goose is thoroughly cooked. Stand up for yourself, know your Rights - which are in your heart - and it is possible, and people have shown, that a situation can be turned around to your favour. According to the Magna Carta 1215, it is every English person's DUTY to do this, and thereby keep the corruption in check)

Intressant sajt detta!
http://www.lawfulrebellion.org

Police, Mental Health Officers, Cybernetics and Us
How many of you have been called insane, mad, stupid or mentally ill since you’ve been talking about Lawful Rebellion or the incessant corruption that we’re all part of? I know I’ve been called all of those at least once just in the past year. Sometimes the people in my past used to hold me back or plant seeds that ended up corrupting my own actions. And a few times they used past experience to judge my present actions without seeing the truth with their real eyes. Instead they used the blind faith of their own ‘mind’ and shared experience of other friends to build a theatre and the role I could just slip right into. It’s a given that when you change, people will perceive you differently or completely ignore the change – this is when people can think you are going mad or insane.

Worry can take over and manifest in the ones you love and can make its subject think it’s true. Where does this worry come from, this fear of saying or doing things ‘out of character’ or unexpected? One of the sources is through the programming at school and the battering by the media, constantly telling us what’s right and what’s wrong, what to wear and what not to wear, what to feel and how to feel, who’s desirable and who’s a twat. The list is endless. But we had little choice as kids growing up, we merely accepted the World around us.

For most of us, Mum and Dad both worked hard, so the Schooling system was entrusted with keeping us safe and teaching us about the World. What a mistake that was for us all eh? Today it’s even worse! We have Nursery School kids being given over 400 tests under the Early Learning Curriculum. So in about 14 years, we’re going to have a mass of 18 year olds with minimal Left-Right brain capabilities. The early years of kids are crucial for brain development. Creativity is one of the only ways to develop expressive thought, which eventually gifts us all the ability to question the World around us. Am I tripping or are there more little kids out there these days who are click, click, clicking, more than whining, why, why, why!?

“[This is] an education [system] that has gradually been taken over by the State has deprived man of active striving; it has made him into a devoted member of the State structure. The State lays claim to the child and he is trained to fit the patterns of the State; he ceases to be a person and bears the stamp of the state.” – Rudolf Steiner

So who are the ‘mental’ ones in this terrible act of mental child abuse? The authorities, parents or us all? Where are the Mental Health Officers’ to take away the parents or the Authorities who dreamt up such insane strategies? Tell you what, let’s forget about it, close this web page and put the kettle on shall we?

Kids today are called, ‘Digital Natives’ in the World of Bollox. Computers and mobiles are artificial limbs, the Internet is the gateway to the truth of their World and ‘privacy’ is an obsolete word. So let’s pose a possible future when these Digital Natives embark on becoming ‘Adults’ (whatever that means). Will these kids resist RFID chips/Verichips and cybernetics? What will they do with all those who resist the bodily presence of technology? I’m not talking about how things changed when computers took over the World in the 80s. I’m talking about when humans will actually attach digital devices and the Internet to their bodies and brains. And don’t forget, these kids will not have much Left/Right brain ability. They could be 100% susceptible to the constant flow of informational intelligence from the Establishment, dictating their Theatre and the roles to play. Where will the Mental Health Officers’ be in this future? Probably the same place where they are now, at the beckoning of the Establishment!

The chessboard has been laid out since the Bible was published and the pawns have only just started to be sacrificed. Every so often we get to see their strategy, when they change their game or move from the offensive to the defensive. Recently, we’ve seen the DVLA change their envelopes; Affidavits working for a full range of cases; Dunn & Bradstreet place restrictions on non-members; people juicing Judges and mangling Magistrates; and people getting used to handling the Police and Authorities.

But we’ve also seen threats of political influence; arrests going bad and a few cases of imprisonment. I know it’s a vibe out talking about the negative, but I feel that if people need to walk this path, then it’s best to give out all the information we have in confronting the external.

There is a new tactic forming within the Authorities when dealing with ‘Freemen’ and people in Lawful Rebellion, namely, Mental Health Officers and the Mental Health Act 2007. Here are two examples you may face:

* A fellow Lawful Rebel who has been fighting the Authorities was ordered by a Judge to attend two doctors and get a certificate from them to say he’s not insane under the Mental Health Act 2007

* Late 2009, the Police stopped a woman in her car and wanted to search her and the car under SOPCA. She refused to give her name and address, was subsequently arrested, and used her knowledge of Lawful Rebellion to her detriment. She was sectioned and put in an institution because her family confirmed, ‘she wasn’t herself and she was talking about Lawful Rebellion and the New World Order, which worries us greatly.’

It seems that the Police and Courts are most likely to use the Mental Health Act against us. So with pleasure, I present a verbal remedy that was happened upon by a man named, Ste Allan, who by all accounts is a hero of Lawful Rebellion. Ste was arrested for a minor offence and he ended up going through the whole ‘no consent’ thing for 7 hours! They ended up forcing him into a psychiatric test under the Mental Health Act 2007. I advise you read the following and keep it in your head for if the time comes:

Ste: Do you mind if I ask you a question first?
Doc: no, go ahead…
Ste: Have you ever undergone a psychiatric assessment?
Doc: Well, no.
Ste: Well, what qualifies you to assess me? How do I know you’re not insane?
Doc: [Pauses] That’s a good question.
Ste: In that case I don’t consent to your offer, I wish not to contract… What the diagnosis would be for someone who without provocation assaulted another human, kidnapped him, couldn’t tell him why, invented a story and locked the human being in a room for 7 hours? Is this kind of behaviour not psychotic? I think you’re examining the wrong man.
Doc: fair point.
Ste: I wish not to contract, I did not consent to your offer you can go.

We cannot truly control the actions of others or the World we have to live in together. All we can do is make sure we’re best equipped for any circumstance that may compromise our integrity, honour and freedom… Even at the hands of cybernetic killer-kids of the future! We can stop all of this when we choose to. But it will take every one of us to find the courage to look within ourselves and give up everything we possess and fear. This can be achieved, not through a bloody revolution, but by slowly weaning ourselves from the Nanny State and letting go of things one by one.

If you let others define your existence, you live in the external and end up acting out a world you are only an actor within.

David Ophalus