Idag är det känt att zionisten och illuminaten Francis Bacon skapade eller rättare sagt valde vilka böcker som Bibeln skulle innehålla. Och därmed stöpte och döpte, kristendomen.

Jordan Maxwell kan idag bekräfta, att Turkiet invaderades av zionister (judar), som kontrollerade Ottomanska Imperiet, och startade Islam, som kommer att bli den andra komponenten i den hegelistiska dialektik, att manipulera två åsikter, för ett styrt resultat, som passar makthavarna.

Stewart Swerdlow bekräftar att zionisterna är samma grupp, som kom fran Sumer, och tidigare Egypten, denna grupp har ett utomjordiskt ursprung, och kan möjligen till och med vara vara föräldrar, dessa "människor" har en annan genetik än "oss", och ett annat psyke. Mer psykopatiska.


Intressant att se att det mesta i världspolitiken idag handlar om zionisterna och deras agenda

dom icensatte 9/11, har som medlem Usas president, och blivande president Obama. Israel, Iran konflikten känner vi till, och vi vet redan att zionisterna ligger bakom alla krig sedan 1600 talet, dom kontrollerar alla banker dvs ekonomin, manipulerar oljepriset och guldpriset, samt styr Fn Eu och Japan.

Samt via England koloniserat halva världen! Detta eftersom Rotschild via Bank of England kontrollerar ekonomin i Uk sedan kriget med Napoleon, samt att de senare tog makten ochså över Frankrikes ekonomi, och sedan dess kontrollerat Europas och världens ekonomi. Dom äger ochså, Europas centralbank, Federal reserve osv osv.

Man behöver bara byta ut ordet "elit" mot "Zionist", så klarnar allt!


Det gäller att förstå, inte "tro"

Du har nog lite fel där med ottomanska riket och islam. Islam grundades ca 500 innan det ottomanska riket.

Kristendomen och texterna fanns långt innan, bara det att vissa slogs ihop i en bok, islam grundar sig väl på samma texter fast lite omskriva och misstolkade har jag läst nånstans.

Quote:

Intressant ang Swerdlow att hans "great uncle" är Yakov Sverdlov, en av männen bakom Ryska revolutionen samt bakom mordet på Tsar-familjen, och själv med judiska föräldrar.

http://www.expansions.com/AboutExpansions.cfm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakov_Sverdlov

Kolla deras bio:

Stewart Swerdlow:
"A gifted medical intuitive, Stewart Swerdlow is a clairvoyant who has the ability to see auric fields and personal archetypes as well as read DNA sequences and mind-patterns..."

Janet Swerdlow:
"With many years of metaphysical background, Janet shares her path that teaches Self direct access to Oversoul and God-Mind. Born consciously aware of her Oversoul and God-Mind connections, her abilities were enhanced through mind-control and programming that began before birth..." och
"Janet is able to consciously access information and training that is available within the Oversoul matrix, including the replication of the hyperspace tones of creation..."


Alltså... såna här "människor" är bara ute för att demoralisera och vilseleda. Men dom får ju komma till tals, på RedIceCreations bl.a. som ju verkar vara helt neutrala till all form av new age skit.

När sions vise protokoll visa sig vara en rysk bluff.
Så får vi peka ut judarna som utomjordingar som kamuflerat sig till islam och kristendom istället, inte zog nu gäller star strek.

"Jordan Maxwell kan idag bekräfta" vem kan säga emot om psykosen bekräftat allt det här:)

Quote:

Dom säger att det är en bluff, men dom tunga historikerna, säger att Protolkollen är genuina, en annan sak, om dom är falska, varför har man genomfört dem till punkt och pricka?

Dont believe anything, until it is officially, denied....


Jo kanske Ottomanska kom senare, men det tog nog några hundra år innan Islam kickstartade, men Islam styrdes från Ottomanska imperiet, enligt Maxwell.

Kallar du Maxwell "psykos" kan du underbygga det??

Var är alla som vrålar "desinfo" nu? Francis Bacon sammanställde Bibeln? Men snälla någon... Kanon fastställdes på 300talet o slogs fast av den katolska kyrkan i mitten på 1500talet, alltså innan Bacon föddes.

Quote:

Det stämmer inte, här är en karta över expansionen under Mohammeds tid och strax där efter:




När det gäller det Ottomanska imperiet så strydes det av en Kalifa, vilket hade sitt säte i Turkiet. De som styrde var turkmenier. Den form av islam så då råde var traditionell islam, man följde de fyra imamerna Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i eller Hanbali och även sufism florerade.

Quote:

Har du hört talas om ordet marionettregering? Eller tror du zionisterna ställer upp, med tillägget, zionist bakom sitt namn i parlamentet?? ande.
Helt klart som du säger expanderade det, efter zionisternas maktövertag

Islam with all its key figures appears as late as 15th-16th century A. D. as a branch of proto-Christianity. This is amply illustrated by imagery of Prophet Mahomet, archangel Gabriel, Heaven and Hell of this period.
http://www.amazon.com/review/R3A80YKC8W7UEE
http://import.book.store.bg/product/i ... nology-2-chronology-.html

:::

The history of humankind is both drastically shorter and dramatically different than generally presumed.
Has history been tampered with? Yes, it has! Did events and eras such as the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, the Roman Empire , the Dark Ages, and the Renaissance, actually occur within a very different chronology from what we've been told? Yes, they certainly did!

Accepted History & Chronology Must Be Changed.
There is no doubt that history as most know it is a sham, & institution's version of History both University & Church is fradulent & inaccurate. Everything was established with an agenda, The real "Dark Ages" are now when we have access to incredible amounts of information past authorities & more important 'common folk' didn't have but our institutions & educators are slow to evolve because of what has ignorantly & arrogantly been taught for too long. This is on many subjects not just Chronology.


The Divinity excommunicates Dr Fomenko because the history of religions according to Fomenko looks as follows: the pre-Christian period (before the 11th century and Jesus Christ ), Bacchic Christianity (11th to 12th century, before and after Jesus Christ), Jesus Christ Christianity (12th to 14th century) and its subsequent mutations (15th to 17th cy) into Orthodox Christianity, the Catholicism, Protestantism, Islam, Buddhism, and so on..; and The Old Testament written after the New Testament in xiv-xvi cy A.D., if you please! Everybody served? Saint Augustine was quite prescient when he said: "be wary of mathematicians, particularly when they speak the truth."
http://import.book.store.bg/product/i ... -chronology-no-1-41-.html

:::

[edit] History and its revision according to A.T. Fomenko and G.V. Nosovsky
The enormous “Mongolian” = Great Empire was forged in the XIV-XV century; it comprised the entire territory of Eurasia, the America and North Africa, for one. Therefore, the Western European rulers were de facto the vicegerents (or vassals) of the mighty Czar, or Khan, of the Horde, or Russia. According to Dr Fomenko, there is plenty of evidence testifying to the subservient position of the Western European rulers in old documents, notwithstanding even the biased editing campaign of the XVII-XVIII century. Dr Fomenko cites allegedly relevant and abundant examples in his vol.4 of “History:Fiction or Science?”. His description of the general situation in the XIV-XVI century is as follows:

Remote provinces of the Empire (among them the countries of Western Europe) differed from the metropolitan imperial centre (Russia, or the Horde, and the Ottoman = Ataman Empire) in status, and most considerably so. The centre of the Empire was primarily occupied with military pursuits and fortification construction, which was a vital prerequisite for holding on to the enormous imperial territories. Every now and then, there would be a rebellion, a dispute or a skirmish between different regions of the Empire. The rebellions needed to be quelled, the disputes, settled, and the warring neighbours pacified and judged. Those tasks required an enormous professional army – or even several armies. A great deal of resources were invested in maintaining an extensive communications network that spanned the whole territory of the Empire. Other liabilities included the collection of tax and the organisation of trade between remote imperial provinces. This is why the metropolitan part of the Empire required military men and government officials for the most part, and enormous administrative machinery.

Remote provinces of the Empire were in a different situation. The Khan of the Horde, or the Czar, was very far away from them. His vicegerents ruled as plenipotentiaries, assisted by the nearby “Mongolian” Cossacks garrisons that took care of maintaining order. Therefore, the primary concerns weren’t with the local military problems, which did exist, of course, but rather the task of winning the Emperor’s favour. A lot had depended upon it. For example, one could gain advantage over one’s neighbours without the need to destroy their armies, simply by sending appropriate gifts to the Czar, or Khan, of the Horde. If the gifts were good, the Czar, of Khan, could be kind enough to permit the local ruler the annexation of another ruler’s territory – especially in cases when the Khan was displeased with the latter for one reason or another (territory mismanagement, irregular tax payments, or the mere inability to offer anything of novelty or interest to the royal court and poor quality of gifts).

This is why applied sciences and arts flourished in Western Europe, for instance – and served the purpose of entertainment, among other things. A certain entertainment industry was created, especially in the resort provinces of the Empire with a salubrious climate, such as Italy, France and Spain. The best specimens were sent to the Khan’s court. The French and the Italians made great headway in architecture, literature, history and music. The English were accomplished shipbuilders, and so on.

The Khan’s court in the Horde considered all the cultural and scientific advances of the Western Europe their very own, at the disposal of the Empire at all times. If the court needed a new fleet to be built, for instance, they would send for British shipbuilders, or build the ships on British wharfs. A skilled medic could be summoned from France, for instance, if France was the residence of some renowned representative of the medical profession around that time. If a cathedral needed to be built in Moscow and the deadline was a tight one, Italian craftsmen could be summoned (which was the case with the construction of the Moscow Kremlin, qv above). They arrived right away.

It is vital to realise that such a summons could not be disobeyed. As soon as a province would receive orders from the Empire, the locals hastened to carry them out or send the required specialists to the imperial capital – from Italy, France, Spain, Germany, England and Asia.

One must assume that there were parties comprising the representatives of a variety of provinces at the court of the Khan, or the Czar, in Yaroslavl – English, French, German parties etc. They competed for priority commissioner status and be assigned to carry out the most honourable and profitable orders, each party attempting to prove it to the “Mongolian” Khan and his administration that their specialists were the best ones around. The victorious party would get commissioning priorities and become more important in the eyes of the Khan’s administration, which meant quite a lot in that epoch.

Then, in the XVII century, after the split-up of the Great = “Mongolian” Empire, when the Western European countries declared their independence, the efforts of the independent imperial vicegerents (and their historians, obviously enough) were focussed on the proof of “historical continuity” of the modern status quo (the independence of Western European countries, that is, the main implication being that the Westerners have never been dependent on the Horde, or Russia. They sought to wipe out the very memory of the rebellion and their usurper status (from their epoch’s perspective). This was the very reason why Scaligerian and Romanovian history was created – its primary objective has been to cast the Great = “Mongolian” conquest into deep antiquity under the coy moniker of “The Great Migration” (the Slavic conquest of Europe in the alleged IV-V century A. D.). The very recent Empire was hastily wiped out from the maps of Europe. The history of the “Mongolian” Khan dynasty of the XIV-XVI century was appropriated as the history of the “European Habsburgs”. The latter were declared as “our very own former emperors, and who’s ever heard of Muscovite rule? Such absurd and politically harmful notions should by no means ever be harboured by anyone.

This ‘historical’ activity completely supposedly coincided with the intentions of the pro-Western dynasty of the Romanovs, who seized power in Russia illegally, as a result of a coup d’état. This is why the dynasty of the Romanovs and their rebellious comrades-in-arms, the new rulers of the Western Europe, were completely coordinated. The Ottomans (or Atamans), who had stood in the way of this “civilisation process”, were crushed in a crusade – carried out by Russian soldiers and paid for in Russian blood.

A revision of old documents, chronicles, memoirs and all sorts of historical evidence in general has been conducted. Many foreigners visited Russia in the XIV-XVI century. Therefore, many authentic documents had still existed in Western Europe, and they reflected the real relations between Western Europe and the Horde perfectly frankly...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Chronology_(Fomenko)

.....

http://osdir.com/ml/politics.region.a ... ria/2005-08/msg00062.html

:::

YouTube - Fomenko, Fake History, Who were the Church Fathers ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2sgAJ-bFi4


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofmoz2 ... =8074F199A761F1A1&index=0

http://www.revisedhistory.org/preface.htm



Acharya S said...
Actually, no, I do not "have" to read Fomenko or anyone else. As I'm sure most people will agree, Fomenko sounds like a complete and raging lunatic. Perhaps he is right on some points, but it will be difficult to believe his overall thesis, and I'm frankly surprised that he has gotten any currency at all.

But, such is life. I've been called a loonie more than a few times myself.

http://tbknews.blogspot.com/2007/02/b ... ed-religion-salesman.html

____

Forts:


Was there really a Dark Age? Bible actually renders the events of the ...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7772580611608898980&hl=en

http://history.mithec.com
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2003/11/prweb89468.htm
http://anatoly-fomenko.com
http://www.chronologia.org/
http://ring.mithec.com/eng/zinoviev.html

"History: Fiction or Science?" New book challenges traditional history



Publisher announces 10,000 USD cash reward for the solid scientific refutation of the New Chronology. Have a look at the advertising spot that History Channel TV refused to air.

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2004/1/prweb98387.php


USD 10,000 Cash Reward. The publishing of the book "History: Fiction or Science?" by prominent mathematician Anatoly Fomenko has created an uproar in the world community of professional historians. We, Delamere Resources Publishing Ltd, have received innumerable venomeneous complaints with unprintable undertones. It is a free world, isn't it? Criticism is mostly welcome. Just do prove with adequate scientific method that this nosy mathematician is utterly wrong. Go to amazon.com, type Fomenko in the search window, order your copy, study it and leave no stone of his heresy unturned. When preparing your case remember that archaeological, dendrochronological, paleographical and carbon methods of dating of ancient sources and artifacts are both non-exact and contradictory, therefore there is not a single piece of firm written evidence or artifact that could be reliably and independently dated earlier than the XI century. Do not hesitate to join forces with chemists, metallurgists, biologists or astronomers; well, any people from natural sciences crowd. Most welcome. Nota bene, your case must be on the same academic level as the heretic Fomenko, OK? Ready, steady, go!

United Kingdom, Douglas, Isle of Man (PRWEB) January 14, 2004 -- Jesus Christ Was Born In 1053 AD And Crucified In 1086 AD – Scientific Research Points To The Evidence

Unbelievable? Not since the release of the flabbergasting oeuvre entitled "History: Fiction or Science?". This book crowns 30 years of extensive research performed by the eminent mathematician Anatoly Fomenko and his colleagues. It is also the first volume in seven comprising "Chronology", the fundamental tractate that exposes and expounds the numerous inveracities of traditional history.

In Chapter I we are reminded of when the contemporary chronological scale was created and by whom, with the culprits named as the XVI-XVII century clergy. We also learn that the consensual model of history had prominent critics ever since its creation – among those such names as Sir Isaac Newton and Jean Hardouin, the court librarian of Louis XIV, the Sun King of France.

The author dissects every historical age most scrupulously and analyses the data from every source imaginable – Roman and Egyptian chronology take a good beating; Bracciolini and Petrarch take the blame for creating the legend of a mythical Classical age that never was.

The Biblical events are brought a lot closer to us both historically and geographically. The Biblical Jerusalem is identified with the mediaeval Constantinople. The New and the Old Testament swap their positions on the chronological scale, both exposed as referring to mediaeval events. We experience a profound historical paradigm shift even before we're through with Chapter I.

In Chapters II, III and IV the author summons astronomy and statistics to back his theories – apparently, there is abundant astronomical proof for the author's theories in the ancient Egyptian zodiacs, Ptolemy's Almagest, and the Biblical Book of Revelation, demonstrating that all datings of 'ancient' eclipses are blatantly untrue.

Chapters V and VI contain in-depth descriptions of the research methods used as well as the most meticulous rendition of the global chronological map with its numerous errors and glitches explained in a very level-headed manner – one doesn't have to be a mathematician to comprehend.

Finally, in Chapter VII we learn more about confusion of the Antiquity and the Middle Ages, and how the division between the two is merely imaginary. Should this fail to suffice, the appendices contain all sorts of factual information to appease the sceptics as well as provide converts with deadly ammunition for keeping the critics well at bay.

Conclusion: "History: Fiction or Science?" is the first successful attempt to transform history from fiction into a rocket science, therefore a must read for everyone who isn't entirely indifferent to human history – and possibly also for those who are.

Find out more at: http://history.mithec.com

Author: Anatoly T. Fomenko Paperback, 628 pages, 446 illustrations
Title: "History: Fiction or Science?" Genre: Non-Fiction (History)
ISBN: 2-913621-01-5 Distributors: Ingram, Baker&Taylor, Amazon.com
Price: US$34.95 Size: 7.5" by 9.25"

Publisher: Delamere Resources Ltd, Contact:
19 Peel Rd., Douglas, Franck Tamdhu
Isle of Man, IM1 4LS Phone: +33-687-61-38-76
U.K. Email: e-mail protected from spam bots
----------------------------


HISTORY CHANNEL TV declines in panic to air the advertising campaign of the sensational book "History: Fiction or Science?" written by the leading mathematician of our time Anatoly Fomenko. Advertising Agent was very astonished by refusal as the spot was in line with HISTORY CHANNEL guidelines.
http://radio.news.prweb.com/releases/2003/12/prweb94054.htm

A revolutionary historical tractate by the eminent mathematician A. T. Fomenko contains the most extensive criticisms of the consensual chronology since Sir Isaac Newton. Have a look at the attached video file of the advertising spot that offended the fine feelings of the learned historians of the HISTORY CHANNEL.

UK, Douglas, Isle of Man. For Immediate Release. The book "History: Fiction or Science?" crowns over 30 years of meticulous and extensive research performed by the eminent mathematician Anatoly Fomenko and his colleagues. It is also the first volume in seven comprising "Chronology", the fundamental tractate that exposes and expounds the numerous inveracities of traditional history.

In Chapter I we are reminded of when the contemporary chronological scale was created and by whom, with the culprits named as the XVI-XVII century clergy. We also learn that the consensual model of history has enjoyed the relentless attention of prominent critics ever since its creation – among those such names as Sir Isaac Newton and Jean Hardouin, the court librarian of Louis XIV, the Sun King of France.

The author dissects every historical age most scrupulously and analyses the data from every source imaginable – Roman and Egyptian chronology take a good beating; Poggio Bracciolini and Petrarch take the blame for creating the beautiful legend of a mythical Classical age that never was.

The Biblical events are brought a lot closer to us both historically and geographically. The Biblical Jerusalem is identified with the mediaeval Constantinople. The New and the Old Testament swap their positions on the chronological scale, both exposed as referring to mediaeval events. We experience a profound historical paradigm shift even before we're through with Chapter I.

In Chapters II, III and IV the author summons astronomy and statistics to back his theories – apparently, there is abundant astronomical proof for the author's theories in the ancient Egyptian zodiacs, Ptolemy's Almagest, and the Biblical Book of Revelation, demonstrating that all datings of 'ancient' eclipses are blatantly untrue.

Chapters V and VI contain in-depth descriptions of the research methods used as well as the most meticulous rendition of the global chronological map with its numerous errors and glitches explained in a very level-headed manner – one doesn't have to be a mathematician to comprehend.

Finally, in chapter VII we learn more about confusion of the Antiquity and the Middle Ages, and how the division between the two is merely imaginary. Should this fail to suffice, the appendices contain all sorts of factual information to appease the sceptics as well as provide converts with deadly ammunition for keeping the critics well at bay.

Conclusion: "History: Fiction or Science?" is the first successful attempt to transform history from fiction into a rocket science, therefore it is a must read for everyone who isn't entirely indifferent to human history – and possibly also for those who are.


----------------------
The real datings of the New Testament events are rediscovered.
http://ww1.prweb.com/releases/2004/8/prweb147740.htm


A. T. Fomenko, the eminent mathematician, suggests that the Nativity and the Crucifixion can be dated to the XI century AD, and offers bulletproof scientific evidence to support the theory.


United Kingdom, Douglas, Isle of Man (PRWEB) August 16, 2004 -- The real datings of the New Testament events are rediscovered. The first thing we learn about the temporal localization of the events described in the Gospels is that they took place around the beginning of the New Era, which is supposed to have started 2000 years ago. The roundness and the greatness of this figure are truly a great comfort. All of this knowledge is usually acquired at an early enough age to accept it without questioning later on. We do know that the science confirms the dates and the locations, though. Or does it?

A. T. Fomenko, the eminent mathematician, suggests that the Nativity and the Crucifixion can be dated to the XI century AD, and offers bulletproof scientific evidence to support the theory. This sounds a little bit less preposterous once we remember that the modern BC/AD datings were introduced in the XVI-XVII century, and it obviously took them some time to attain global renown.

Some extracts from "History: Fiction or Science", which was published in English recently and may well be regarded as the most explosive tractate on history ever written – but every theory it contains, no matter how unorthodox, is backed by solid scientific data:

"The Catholic Church has been claiming the "very house" that Virgin Mary had lived in and where "Archangel Gabriel appeared before her" to have been located in the Italian town of Loreto since the XIII century, which means that the Catholic version transfers a part of evangelical events to Italy."

"Seeck in his "History of the Ancient World's Decline" wrote that "we have no intention… of picturing his [Christ's – A. F.] earthly destiny… all the issues of the origins of Christianity are so complex that we are glad to have the opportunity and the right to leave them well alone". A convenient stance, and one that has got absolutely nothing to do with science."

Two quotes from the eminent archaeologist Schwegler offered by Fomenko himself:

"This is where the tragedy begins for the believer whose primary need is to know the place on Earth where his Saviour had lived and suffered. But it is the location of the place of his (Christ's) death, that remains covered in impenetrable darkness, if we're to think in archaeological categories."

"Apparently, there is no possibility of determining the location of the cities of Nazareth and Capernaum, as well as that of Golgotha etc., on the territory of modern Palestine."

Learn more at http://history.mithec.com
.--------------

http://www.ereleases.com/pr/2003-09-26a.html
http://nonprofit.news.prweb.com/releases/2004/8/prweb147500.htm

/Novax (bannad sedan i mars)

Quote:

Jag vet inte riktigt vem och vilka du menade skulle varit zionister, Muhammed själv? Efter hans död var det Abu Bakar och senare Umar som tog över vílka var hans närmaste. Men det som störtade det Ottomanska imperiet var alliansen mellan Wahhab och klanen Saud, tillsammans med frimurarna som infiltrerade Turkiet + missionerande propagande från Europa.

Quote:

Dubbelsuck...nä trippelsuck... Om det där sant är Francis Bacon expert på förfalskningar av dokument som existerade 1400 år före sin tid... Kanske var han ett spöke? Faktum är att hela Nya testamentet kan rekonstrueras helt utifrån utombibliska källor från första och andra århundradet. De första kyrkofäderna som kom efter lärjungarna var väldigt produktiva i brevväxling och predikningar, offentliga debatter med mera. De citerade bibeln och därför vet vi vilka böcker som de ansåg som auktoritativa. Irreneus, lärjunge till lärjunge, till Jesus lärjunge Johannes skrev redan i början av hundratalet vilka böcker som i NT räknades till kanon. Det var i pricip en komplett lista på dagens böcker, inga gnostiska skrifter. Några få böcker/brev saknades jämfört med dagens kanon, men inga som är tongivande för kristen teologi. Inga böcker har tagits bort från hans lista. Det är alltså en myt att Bibeln inte sattes samman förän på 400-talet av Konstatin. Att Francis B skulle vara ansvarig är så absurt att det inte finns gränser. Gamla testamentets kanon VET man är minst från 300 talet före Kristus. Den heberiska kanon bekräftas dels inbördes i GT och dels genom Talmud och andra judiska skrifter.

Det finns en stark gren av New Agerörelsen som i likhet med upplysningsideologerna tror sig veta bättre än de som var på plats när det hände för 2000 år sen. Jordan, Tsarion och andra skruvar är bara ytterligheter av den barnsliga hållningen. Folk här på forumet måste förstå att det finns inget som är så enormt väldokumenterat som kristen tradition, kristna böcker och kristen teologi. Det finns heller ingen samling böcker som Bibeln som har undersökts av så många så mycket genom 4000 år. Det är bokstavligt talat omöjligt för en eller flera personer att manipulera ett så stort fenomen. Inte ens illuminati. Som jag har påpekat i andra diskussioner går det att med all tydlighet bevisa att Bibeln som vi läser den har varit i princip oförändrad i 2300 år.

När det gäller judendomens och kristendomens avgörande påverkan på historien är det viktigt att inte förvirra Guds handlande i historien med en påstådd zionistisk konspiration som går utanför behovet att skapa ett folkhem för Israel. Det står i Bibeln att Israel ska vara en stötesten för folken och det är det ju onekligen. Det har alltid varit så och kommer så att förbli. Det har inget med konspirationer att göra utan att folk hatar Gud.

/Mordecai (Juden som vägrade böja sig för sin tids galenskap, Esters Bok)

Novax! Din historie lektion...öh... om medeltiden inte funnits är det extremt mycket historia någon/några måste kunna omintetgöra. Det finns över hela världen bokstavligt talat hundratusentals dokument, arkeologsika fynd, historiska traditioner som gör att det inte finns något utrymme att ifrågasätta tidskalan så som modern historia beskriver den. Kommer vi förbi Kristifödelse så bli det däremot mer suddigt och årtal och tid förvirras. Vissa forskare hävdar tex att den Egyptiska kronologin är 600 år för lång. Mycket kan som sagt Illuminate ställa till med men där går gränsen.

/M

Quote:

Jag har inte alls satt mig in i Fomenkos böcker, har bara en ,iten del av hans info.
Tills vidare utgår jag från att han har rätt.

Quote:

John Allegro skulle inte hållt med här...