bennybear skrev:
PRECIS så tycker Illuminat-marxisterna också!!

VAD är ett människoliv värt, bara JAG får vältra mig i mina lustar.

VAD bryr jag mig om att ta ansvar för mina handlingar??

zpz2 skrev:
Om det är några som vill kontrolla folk så är det de moralkonservativa.

maggot skrev:
Quote:

zpz2 skrev:
Om det är några som vill kontrolla folk så är det de moralkonservativa.

Och var hör man dessa vibbar ?

Var i TV-debbaterna och på mässor,statligt finanseriade seminarier hörs dessa röster ?

On the 28th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, President Bush signed an executive order Monday banning federal funds to international family planning groups that offer abortion or abortion counseling.

"It is my conviction that taxpayer funds should not be used to pay for abortions or advocate or actively promote abortion either here or abroad," Bush states in the order.

The order prohibits the allocation of U.S. funds to groups who support abortion, either by performing the procedure, or offering abortion counseling or lobbying governments abroad.
/.../
The order was not unexpected, but it would likely worsen tensions with abortion rights advocates already angered by the selection of abortion opponents John Ashcroft for attorney general and Tommy Thompson for secretary of health and human services.

Meanwhile, anti-abortion groups hailed the new administration's active opposition to abortion as they marked Monday's anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling in Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that struck down state laws banning the procedure, with marches and protests.

Bush's order is a strong symbolic move, as was his statement to abortion opponents' rally Monday afternoon.

In a written statement, read by New Jersey Republican Rep. Chris Smith, Bush said the promise of a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness in the Declaration of Independence "are for everyone, including unborn children."
/.../
Supporters of abortion rights marked the anniversary by warning that the freedoms granted in the Roe decision were now under threat by a Republican administration and a Republican-controlled Congress. Kate Michelman, president of the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League, said Bush "is bending to the will of the far right on these issues."

"He so quickly shed his facade and his cloak of moderation on this issue," she said. Bush was "using his presidential powers quite aggressively already to undermine a woman's right to choose."

Added Gloria Feldt, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America: "The fundamental human and civil right to make our own childbearing choices without government intervention is more threatened now than it has been in all of the 28 years since Roe v. Wade was decided."

During the presidential campaign, Bush made it clear that he felt the 1973 decision went too far. Last week, his wife Laura said on NBC's Today show that she did not believe Roe v. Wade should be overturned, but stressed that she agrees with her husband's support of abstinence education and believes the number of abortions in the United States should be reduced.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Bush administration is proposing to double spending on sexual abstinence programs that bar any discussion of birth control or condoms to prevent pregnancy or AIDS despite a lack of evidence that such programs work.

A study by researchers at the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of declining birth and pregnancy rates among teenagers concludes that prevention programs should emphasize abstinence and contraception.

"Both are important," said Dr. John Santelli, the lead author of the study, which has not been published.

In Minnesota, a study found that sexual activity doubled among junior high school students taking part in an abstinence-only program. The independent study, commissioned by the state's health department, recommended broadening the program to include more information about contraception.

Independent researchers who are studying abstinence-only programs for the federal government said in their first report two years ago that no reliable evidence exists whether the programs work. They are expected to issue an update soon.

In his State of the Union address, President Bush said, "We will double federal funding for abstinence programs, so schools can teach this fact of life: Abstinence for young people is the only certain way to avoid sexually transmitted diseases."

Bush would spend $270 million on abstinence-only education, compared with $100 million annually when he took office.

The president also would move the programs into the same agency within the Health and Human Services Department that oversees religious-based programs and the president's proposal to promote marriage.

Morning-After Pill opponents claim that they are just concerned about the health or welfare of women who take that particular pill, but there's a pattern of the Bush administration and Republicans restricting birth control information and access to all forms of contraception, including condoms. The following article was written by Campus NOW president Kelly Mangan, with input from the Redstockings Women's Liberation Archives and Gainesville Women's Liberation.

There is a movement gathering steam in the United States against birth control. Of the 39 million fertile women who have sex with men, 95% use a form of contraception.1 Obviously, the anti-birth control movement doesn't represent the vast majority of women. So why is it gaining ground so fast? Well, unfortunately the movement does have the support of the White House.

In George W. Bush's first budget to Congress (April 9, 2001), he scrapped the provision that required insurance companies to cover contraceptives for 9 million federal employees (something House democrats later reinstated). Bush insisted that this measure was meant to save money, but if were we really concerned with saving money, perhaps he should have spent less on tax cuts to the rich instead of axing programs that benefit women.

Also on April 9, Bush blocked U.S. grants to family-planning groups that provide contraceptive and abortion services/counseling overseas. While the president has certainly done his part to limit the knowledge and options of women abroad, the focus of Bush's war on women is at home.

Bush is an ardent supporter of abstinence-only education programs, which prohibit discussion of contraception, and keep sexually active teens from knowing how to protect themselves from pregnancy and STDs, and provide blatant misinformation to students.

According to a study released by the Sexuality Information & Education Council of the U.S. (SIECUS) on June 22, 2004, federally funded abstinence-only education programs don't prevent teens from having sex.2 An independent study commissioned by the Minnesota Department of Health also determined last January that abstinence-only education had not worked there-sexual activity among junior high students actually doubled in the first year the program was taught!3

And a December 2004 report prepared by the Special Investigations Commission of the U.S. House of Representatives, for Congress member Henry Waxman, found that "over 80% of the abstinence-only curricula contain false, misleading, or distorted information about reproductive health." For example, one curriculum states that "[i]n heterosexual sex, condoms fail to prevent HIV approximately 31% of the time" and another teaches that a pregnancy occurs one out of every seven times that couples use condoms. These erroneous statements are presented as proven scientific facts," the report notes. They also make abortion sound like it'll damage you for life, the report says: "One curriculum states that 5% to 10% of women who have legal abortion will become sterile; that 'premature birth, a major cause of mental retardation, is increased following the abortion of a first pregnancy;' and that "[t]ubal and cervical pregnancies are increased following abortions. In fact, these risks do not rise..." the report stated.

Despite these findings, Bush continues to push abstinence-only education, and to toe the anti-birth control line, as can be seen by his executive appointments.

StenAOlsson skrev:
Är det ingen mer än jag som ser att Amnestys logga är ett
spegelvänt dollar tecken ?? hehe

http://net11.amnesty.se/www

Det naturliga i ett förhållande är förstås att man lever monogamt. När man lever i ett sådant förhållande så kan båda parterna bestämma om ett barn ska bli till. Alla vet att när man har samlag utan skydd så är det risk att kvinnan kan bli med barn. Förr i tiden sågs samlag som något man gjorde för att alstra barn. Om man har det tankesättet så behöver inte abort ske.

Tony skrev:
Så som jag ser det är moral och ansvar extremt viktigt. I alla val man gör så finns det konsekvenser bakom ens handlande. Visst, i extrema fall (som t ex vid våldtäkt) kan abort vara berättigat. Men abort kan aldrig sättas i system. Man kan inte gå omkring och ha sex med hur många olika som helst som sedan resulterar i abort bara för att man drivs av starka lustar eller att man var påverkad av alkohol. Sverige har blivit mer och mer promiskuöst och sexuellt ohämmat, och one-night stand är ganska vanligt. Sex bör ske i förälskelsens namn och bör inte missbrukas.

Det naturliga i ett förhållande är förstås att man lever monogamt. När man lever i ett sådant förhållande så kan båda parterna bestämma om ett barn ska bli till. Alla vet att när man har samlag utan skydd så är det risk att kvinnan kan bli med barn. Förr i tiden sågs samlag som något man gjorde för att alstra barn. Om man har det tankesättet så behöver inte abort ske.

se7en skrev:
Ett embryo har inget medvetande.

se7en skrev:
Quote:

Tony skrev:
Så som jag ser det är moral och ansvar extremt viktigt. I alla val man gör så finns det konsekvenser bakom ens handlande. Visst, i extrema fall (som t ex vid våldtäkt) kan abort vara berättigat. Men abort kan aldrig sättas i system. Man kan inte gå omkring och ha sex med hur många olika som helst som sedan resulterar i abort bara för att man drivs av starka lustar eller att man var påverkad av alkohol. Sverige har blivit mer och mer promiskuöst och sexuellt ohämmat, och one-night stand är ganska vanligt. Sex bör ske i förälskelsens namn och bör inte missbrukas.

Det verkar som du tror att folk knullar runt med alla de kommer över UTAN skydd och sen; oj fan, jag blev visst gravid, men det finns det kliniker till.

Sex bör ske när som helst, med vem man vill! Det har man tamefan rätt att bestämma själv. Jag skyddar mig alltid, men det händer faktiskt att preventivmedel sviker.
Ska jag sätta ett barn till världen som jag inte vill ha, för att jag ville knulla? Stackars det barnet isåfall.
Abort är inte mord, ett embryo har inget medvetande.


Quote:

Det naturliga i ett förhållande är förstås att man lever monogamt. När man lever i ett sådant förhållande så kan båda parterna bestämma om ett barn ska bli till. Alla vet att när man har samlag utan skydd så är det risk att kvinnan kan bli med barn. Förr i tiden sågs samlag som något man gjorde för att alstra barn. Om man har det tankesättet så behöver inte abort ske.

Det naturliga är väl knappast att leva monogamt, det är vad vi har bestämt är normalt.
Det naturliga är att sprida sin avkomma.
Få arter lever monogamt.