http://prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/300307executerosie.htm

Frothing bloodthirsty Neo-Con TV talking heads have crossed the line in their response to Rosie O'Donnell's comments on The View, with one MSNBC guest calling for O'Donnell to be executed for questioning the U.S. government.

Maniacal Neo-Con attack dogs cannot debate Rosie O'Donnell on a level playing field about the issues she raises on her show and therefore always have to resort to ad hominem name calling, demands that she be fired and as was broadcast last night, public calls for her to be hanged.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pYesE ... F300307executerosie%2Ehtm

Rosie har tagit 9/11 ytterligare ett steg mot MAINSTREAM MEDIA !!

Att de öppet börja tala om hängning av folk som kritiserar den officiella teorin visar att ribban sjunker för varje dag som går. Det ni ser är den smärtsamma dragkampen mellan en spillra av frihet och en kommande fascistregim. Välj sida jävligt snabbt nu för nu är vi på slutspurten.

Sjukt inslag, dom verkar inte bry sig ett dugg om att försöka bevisa att Roise har fel, utan enbart trycka ner henne o förlöjliga.

Dom börjar väl bli lite scary nu...

http://www.911blogger.com/node/7367

UPDATE: It turns out that the guy calling for Rosie's death is the guy who played Danny Partridge on the Partridge Family tv show as a boy actor. Now there's a real expert on the issues involved in analyzing 9/11.

http://www.911blogger.com , 99% av alla seraphim's länkar kommer därifrån , den är bra att kolla regelbundet om nu inte alla har den i Bokmärken , lägg den på skrivbordet helst.

Geraldo Spanks Bill O'Reilly Who Tries To Attack Sheen, Cuban, Rosie & ABC:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YveAiJ ... www%2E911blogger%2Ecom%2F

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_AGpb ... www%2E911blogger%2Ecom%2F

De försöker skrämma andra på olika sätt att inte komma ut och snacka , O'Reilly är en gris.

Om man nu inte förstår hur det fungerar när man ska hålla något hemligt , eller hur mediamänniskor kan styras , och hur journalister + de som är inblandade i känsliga saker kan kompromeras:

Ni kan börja med att kolla operation mockingbird:
Operation Mockingbird is a Central Intelligence Agency operation to influence domestic and foreign media, whose activities were made public during the Church Committee investigation in 1975 (published 1976).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird

Media och de som kontrollerar media ska helst vara infiltrerat och/eller kontrollerbart.
Press kan sättas på olika människor inom media på alla möjliga sätt , ger de inte med sig så knäcks den människan till slut på olika sätt.

Hög lön , Pengar , olika förmåner , prestige , fortsatta karriärmöjligheter och att kunna behålla sitt jobb brukar räcka , kan de hitta något att kompromera personen med , något de kan hota med att lyfta fram inför familj eller arbetsgivare eller i media
i framtiden , så görs det , det kan vara en mängd olika saker, skattebrott , något eller flera felsteg med prostituerade eller annat som diskrediterar personen , narkotika m.m.

Helst vill de ha med alla som är inflytelserika i något "opassande"
där bilder tas så att de inte blir några problem i framtiden , som typ Bohemian Grove , alla dessa partyn med homosexuella och underåriga som har skett i Washington med kopplingar till vita huset och senaten och kongressen.

Orkar inte förklara mer , get it ?

Media Matters Ignores Right Wing Attacks on Rosie O'Donnell:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/7408

Another indication of media blackout on 9/11 issues:

Media Matters has failed to report on any of the recent "conservative" media's feeding frenzy on Rosie O'Donnell and their vitriolic attacks on her First Amendment rights, which include calling for her dismissal and execution.

Media Matters just this week defended the repulsive Ann Coulter: http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/page.php?a=32662

With any other topic, Media Matters would have sent out press releases, blogged, and posted the information on their front page. They routinely monitor all Fox broadcasts and other Administration stenographic media personalities, calling them on misinformation, unprofessional conduct, and the like. According to their webpage:

Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media. Launched in May 2004, Media Matters for America put in place, for the first time, the means to systematically monitor a cross section of print, broadcast, cable, radio, and Internet media outlets for conservative misinformation — news or commentary that is not accurate, reliable, or credible and that forwards the conservative agenda — every day, in real time.

Using the website www.mediamatters.org as the principal vehicle for disseminating research and information, Media Matters posts rapid-response items as well as longer research and analytic reports documenting conservative misinformation throughout the media. Additionally, Media Matters works daily to notify activists, journalists, pundits, and the general public about instances of misinformation, providing them with the resources to rebut false claims and to take direct action against offending media institutions.

Before Rosie began talking about 9/11, they reported several times on their front page that Glenn Beck had called her a "fat witch," and included his retraction that stated he shouldn't have said "witch" but stands by his critique of her size. However, I have found no mention of the past week's disgusting display by the Reich Wing media. I sent them an email, calling them on this bizarre and inexplicable exclusion. In a more disciplined fashion, I asked:

Hey, guys, what are you so afraid of? A bit of a funding conflict? Isn't this where the rubber meets the road?

Here is the link for the contact page, if anyone else wants to weigh in: http://mediamatters.org/contact_us

http://www.911blogger.com/node/7410

John Gibson and Michelle Malkin Whip Up Frenzy Over Rosie O'Donnell and ABC

Reported by Deborah - March 30, 2007

Bill O'Reilly started a campaign last night to have Rosie O'Donnell fired from The View, ABC, for expressing her opinions on Iran and 9/11. This morning at 6 AM, Donald Trump was already quoting O'Reilly almost verbatim on The Imus Show demanding that ABC fire O'Donnell. So of course, John Gibson continued the fire Rosie campaign today with noxious Michelle Malkin who added Barbara Walters to the FOX News list of the currently unclean who must be punished. 3/30/07

Malkin thought that ABC should be held accountable for O'Donnell's comments but claimed there were too many like minded people in ABC management to do anything about Rosie O'Donnell. Gibson speculated that ABC wants O'Donnell to say these things.

Malkin said that people watch O'Donnell because she's like " a freak show" adding that it irked her that Rosie got applause after her comments. A clip of O'Donnell hanging upside down for back problems was flashed periodically on the screen,

Malkin complained that poor Elizabeth Hasslehoff was getting bullied by O'Donnell and Barbara Walters reputation was being eroded because of their association.

comment: If you change all the gender specific pronouns to masculine, change ABC to FOX and replace the Malkins with O'Reillys, the above summary would be a perfect description of The O'Reilly Factor Any name would be an appropriate replacement for Hasslehoff and Walters. Of course, Hannity would work well too.

Bara kopiera text och klistra in ?
Nån kommentar/åsikt bör du skriva förutom att endast kopiera och klistra in , och http://www.911blogger.com borde du ha som som signatur eller avatar eller hänvisa att de inlägg som du kopierar rakt av utan kommentar kommer från http://www.911blogger.com och att uppmana folk att kolla in den sidan , som uppdateras dygnet runt.

Quote:

Och du tror inte att folk fattar att inläggen kommer därifrån när de klickar på länken och kommer till 911blogger? Och jag skriver en kommentar om jag känner för det, ok.

Vad ska jag skriva i det här fallet? Usch vilka hemska människor som hotar Rosie, eller vadå?

Jo du får göra precis som du vill , men jag tycker man bör skriva någon tanke/kommentar/åsikt i inläggen.

Du har fel , det finns hur många trådar som helst du har startat utan att man vet att det kommer från http://www.911blogger.com , du har kopierat och klistrat in från http://www.911blogger.com utan kommentar och utan referens till http://www.911blogger.com.

Ett tips: rätt lätt att skriva: från http://www.911blogger.com , i början , eller i slutet på inlägget.

Quote:

Kommer man till 911blogger här ? :
En av de senaste trådarna du har startat , allt från 911blogger:
Below the belt

Det är väl en typ 100 likadana inlägg/trådar till ,
det var ju t.o.m. ett inlägg nyligen som frågade var din text kom ifrån.

Quote:

Där står det 911 blogger, ser du det?

http://www.911blogger.com/node/7434#comment

Vsd står det där, jo, 911 blogger.

http://www.associatedcontent.com/arti ... /rosie_odonnell_lambasted...

If you look around the cable news channels today, you don't have to wait too long before you will see a Rosie O'Donnell story. And she seems to be getting roundly slammed, most especially on FOX. But the other outlets got in the Rosie roasting too. And the internet is awash with Rosie blasting.

The first item to be pointed out in Rosie's favor is that the show she is on is called The View, not "The News." She is entitled to her views as much as anyone. And her comments are less inflammatory than many. The producers of The View have elected to have Rosie on the show, and many viewers like her. In fact, the ratings for the show have increased substantially since Rosie O'Donnell came on the show. Still, Rosie seems to be the person the right loves to hate.

The most outrageous segment I watched was on Fox News, on The Big Story. While it is true that most prudent observers no longer count Fox News as a true news outlet, they claim to be. Rosie's show never makes claims to be hard news. The anchor for The Big Story is Julie Banderas. Another one of the beautiful faces on Fox who do their best to look good while giving out opinion and calling it news.

For example, when Rosie was talking about the taking of British sailors and marines by Iranian Revolutionary Guards she said "I have one thing to say - Gulf of Tonkin - google it." Referring of course to the 1964 incident largely responsible for American involvement in Vietnam. The military reporting of the incidents at the Gulf of Tonkin are highly suspect, and it is even doubted that one of the two 'engagements" even took place.

When reporting about Rosie, host Julie Banderas described the Gulf of Tonkin incidents as "a 1964 U.S. naval engagement." She didn't feel the need to elaborate beyond that. She then goes on to read from Rosie's blog, in which Rosie writes that she expects the taking of the British to be part of a plan to expand war to Iran. Sorry, Julie, but that is a question that many Americans have. The timing seems suspect at best.

The next Rosie claim that Fox decides to take on is her assertion that the 9/11 attacks in New York may have had more to them than has been reported. Specifically she takes issue with the way building 7 came down at the World Trade Center site. Again, this is something that many people have questions about. It is hard to believe that the attacks happened completely as reported. There are too many inconsistencies and holes for easy explanation. And who could deny the huge benefits that the Bush Administration got from 9/11? While they might not be directly responsible, it is hard to imagine that they didn't see some attacks coming. If not directly guilty, they are at least guilty of negligence.

Banderas then welcomes a guest, WPRO radio talk host John Depetro. He calls Rosie's views "enemy propaganda." He calls Rosie a "conspiracy nut." He also says of ABC "if they're not gonna fire Rosie O'Donnell then they should fire Elisabeth Filarsky, 'cause she is no match for Rosie. They should have on Ann Coulter, or Michelle Malkin, or some other female who could put her in her place." First, Elisabeth goes by her married name, Elisabeth Hasselbeck. Second, Ann Coulter or Michelle Malkin don't have controversial views?

Banderas then has the temerity to say that she wonders if any networks "beside fair and balanced ones" are covering the story. She has to know that the story is out everywhere. Her guest goes on to take issue with Rosie O'Donnell claiming to get most of her news from outside the U.S. Again, many free-thinking people try to get their news from as many sources as possible. It isn't a crime to want to hear unbiased information. Where should she get her news - Fox?

What no one seems to mention are the many charities and children's efforts that Rosie is involved in. Rosie is a woman some people love to hate. Her views, her sexuality, her weight, her looks - all have come under attack. She is a woman with strong views. And she has the same right to expression that Ann Coulter or Michelle Malkin have. While I don't agree with everything she says, I defend her right to say it. On that note, Go Rosie!

skulle sagt så här:
nämn gärna att din text kommer från 911blogger när så ej framgår av texten:
"Från http://www.911blogger.com"
Här nedan framgår inte det t.ex.:
Below the belt

Det är väl en typ 100 likadana inlägg/trådar till ,
det finns ett inlägg nyligen som frågade var din text kom ifrån.[/quote]