http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/76020-terorrism-0

All the stories we see in the TV news, print and Internet media today are like mice in a small room occupied by a grizzly bear. We can see the bear, hear him panting and growling as he attempts to stomp on us, but everyone pretends he's just not there, even though he's eating all the food and we mice are starving.

The bear is the U.S. government and media cover up of the 9/11 attacks. They never came close to proving that foreign "terrorists" were involved. Of all four missing planes' passenger manifests, not one Middle Easterner was on any of them. A jihadist who is bravely going to his death for the sake of his beliefs in Allah and Islam is a martyr and wants the whole world to know it. Martyr's families receive reverential praise and support in their communities for decades. Yet not one of the "terrorists" the American government insists were on the aircraft used their real names or were listed on the passenger lists. At least seven of the nineteen 'hijackers' are still alive.

The 9/11 attacks were created for justification of U.S. covert plans to grab influence over oil politics in the Middle East and as an excuse to take away the rest of Americans' liberties through a manufactured threat-scenario called, "The War On Terror."

What good are all the thousands of articles about politics, global warming, education, scandals, religion, economics and how we must always go out and vote so that we can "make a difference"? If our votes really did make a difference, they'd be illegal.

Who cares about such articles when the cover up of what really happened on 9/11 is hands-off, an untouchable leper? What good are they when in the name of a phony "terrorist attack," our way of life no longer exists except at the pleasure of corporate-driven federal socialists? We are being starved of our liberties by a ursus horribulus that stomps every mouse who dares get in his way or mention that he's there.

I see a lot of authors write all around the grizzly bear, almost approaching the truth, but none seem to have the conviction to call for an open door to run the bear out of the house. Our Founding Fathers would have made a bearskin rug.

I will tell you here and tell you now with no equivocation: THE 9/11 ATTACKS WERE NOT DONE BY TERRORISTS.

There is absolutely no need for the PATRIOT Act, the FEMA Police, Homeland Security, airline and stadium searches and warrantless monitoring of every phone call and e-mail conversation we make.

In the name of a false threat that never existed, all of our rights and freedoms have been trivialized. Every branch of federal government has been suborned, including the U.S. Supreme Court, whose judicial activists invent law and have recently canceled our rights to own property, in Kelo v. City of New London, making eminent-domain confiscations of our homes to increase politicians' tax profits 'constitutional.'

Central government today is one-hundred times worse than under George III, yet how many Americans can see this? Perhaps most don't want to see it, because it might compel them to drop their precious remote controls.

There is no war on terror

If there was, the whole nation would be told to take up arms. Everybody would be armed, even on aircraft. Inexpensive AK47's would be stored in every closet, much like arms are stored in homes all over Switzerland because the Swiss government has nothing to fear from its populace. There is only a war against our freedom in the name of a created threat that doesn't exist. We have been duped into surrendering our liberty in the false name of security by a government that sends us out into the "War On Terror" unarmed because we cannot be trusted with guns. The most basic of all rights is the right of self defense against criminal attacks. A great equalizer between the weak and the strong, guns in the hands of women could reduce assaults upon them by stronger male attackers by 80%. How can it be said that women have equal rights if they cannot carry, yet Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Hillary Clinton and Laura Bush all hide behind guns for their protection because they're much more important than our wives, sisters and daughters? Again, the only 'war' is on our freedoms.

People are so used to being indoctrinated by government that they have actually been convinced to ignore their own eyes. Everyone who saw the videos of the World Trade Center Towers saw them fall exactly like other high-rise buildings that were dropped by sequential demolition charges, at the speed of gravity because there was no structural resistance below to impede their collapse into their basement footprints. Yet almost every viewer has been convinced by the lap-dog media that measly jet-fuel fires could melt the massive steel girders of both buildings, then make everything collapse. Just like a pilot's foot pedals could make a passenger jet burst into flames, then crash in Rockaway, NY. Apparently the federal government has learned that the public will buy any lie, no matter how absurd, if it's repeated often enough.

There were dozens and dozens of reports by rescue workers on the ground at the WTC complex that heard explosions over an hour after the planes crashed into the towers. They felt explosions under their feet that were so powerful that seismographs registered them at 2.1 and 2.3 on the Richter scale. Only explosions could have caused them.

The weekend before the 9/11 WTC demolition, all power was shut down to install "computer cables." No one was allowed inside and all security cameras and alarms had no power for 30 hours. Computer cables don't connect with building electricity, so the need to turn off and close both towers to do so is indicative of another motive, like planting charges without alarms and video surveillance. Marvin Bush, brother to President George and Jeb, was a principal in Securacom, which was in charge of security for the World Trade Center. Didn't hear that on the TV news, did you?

Suckers who still buy into the monumental lie that aircraft crashes caused the collapse of both WTC Towers, cannot explain how a steel beam weighing twice as much as a Boeing 767 flew from one WTC building over 390 feet to bury itself very deeply into the neighboring American Express building

Even harder to explain is why WTC Building 7, a block away, collapsed "because of fire," when it received no damage from the Twin Towers' collapse. No other skyscraper in the world ever collapsed because of a fire of any type, including that from a B25 bomber crashing into the Empire State Building decades ago.

Of all the air crashes in the USA over the past three decades, how many ground crashes resulted in not recovering their black boxes, containing pilots' voices (CVR's) and aircraft telemetries (FDR's) before and during impact? Yet not one usable black box was ever recovered from any of the four planes that reputedly were hijacked on 9/11. Not one.

Flight 93 that contained the "Let's roll!" myth, where four passengers supposedly tried to overpower the hijackers, did not crash into one small area like it should have. It's debris was spread over 8 miles, indicating that it was shot down by a military fighter jet, exploding in the sky and raining down debris over eight miles, "like confetti."

The WTC was the biggest crime, mass murder, 'hijackings' and air crashes in US history. Yet all the forensic evidence was immediately removed, buried or shipped to smelters so that not one investigator from any agency could inspect it. Who has that kind of power?

President Bush and all his staff swore to God to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America , then apparently went on to violate their oaths of office by completely ignoring the Constitution. Bush maintains that he can ignore the U.S. Constitution and tap into private computers, phone lines, medical records and any other private citizens' data whenever he wants, by his self-declared doctrine of "Unitary Executive.” He claims that as Commander-In-Chief the president is the sole judge of the law, is unbound by the Geneva Conventions against torture and possesses inherent authority to subordinate the entire government to his rule - including Congress and the courts.

Bush also originated "Extraordinary Rendition.” This program, also condoned by Vice President Dick Cheney, involves the clandestine transfer of suspected terrorists to countries ruled by regimes that torture and commit other forms of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. Dr. William F. Schulz, executive director of Amnesty International USA, referring to a set of CIA flight logs obtained by his organization, said the logs were “...irrefutable proof that the United States is ‘disappearing’ people into secret facilities where they are held incommunicado without charge, trial, or access to the outside world.”

The American Reichstag Fire of the 9/11 "terrorist attacks" was created so that the American public would back the invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Iran in the name of "The War On Terror," while stripping away the rights of the same American public. The results have been the same as in Nazi Germany, suspensions of freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and private ownership of property. Citizens are forbidden to own the same weapons that their "servants," their police and military, carry to defend themselves. There is literally more freedom in most Third-World countries than now in the USA, which has ten times the per-capita prison population than the People's Republic of China.

Alexis de Tocqueville wisely observed, “I know of no country in which there is so little independence of mind and real freedom of discussion as in America.”

The 'War On Terror' is a sham to enable U.S. power to confiscate, to torture, to imprison without due process and to invade any country that the military-industrial complex fancies. When God was kicked out of public life, we know who stepped in.

Where are the cries for impeachment?

Where are the defenders of liberty? None of them seem to work in the broadcast or print media.

When are citizens going to demand that the cover up of 9/11 be kicked out the door along with the people who invented it? When will the truth be told, that THERE IS NO WAR ON TERROR, but only on oil and on citizens' rights?

The bear is there, but where are the mice with the courage to force him out the door?

Jack Duggan

Jag hoppas att du är medveten om att du hämtat citatet från en insändarsida och inte från Pravdas egen rapportering.

Quote:

Och ?

För en gångs skull, sluta undvik det stora sammanhanget och övertyga oss varför vi inte ska ifrågasätta det krig mot vår frihet som nu pågår. I en annan tråd drog man upp problemet med den ensidiga rapporteringen i massmedia och det inlägget undvek både du och zpz2 som pesten. Dags att visa var ni står nu.

Zink, med andra ord så tycker du att alla som inte jobbar inom media snackar skit, eller inte vet vad dom snackar om alls? Då kan vi ju lägga ner denna web, och alla andra webbar som är relaterade till artiklar med text från en icke utbildad journalist, eller reporter. med andra ord så sågar du också dig själv, det är ingen idé att lyssna på dig, du jobbar ju inte på något mediarelaterat företag, eller gör du det kanske?

Att slå på vanligt folk har blivit poppis, vanliga människor har ingenting att säga till om från början, och du gör det värre.

LÅGT!

Förespråkare av ensidig nyhetsrapportering är också förespråkare av intellektuell skörbjugg, men att över huvud taget resonera i den riktningen visar bara på att det är ganska tomt i den egna boetten.....

Quote:


Vad är det som du anser vi undviker som pesten?

Jag anser INTE att det finns en ensidig rapprotering i massmedia utan så många olika aktörer som rapporterar att man får en bra bild över omvärlden.

Det finns i det vanliga samhället kritik mot t.ex. den övervakning av mailtrafiken som föreslagit då den stött på många praktiska problem där den vanligaste invändningen är att många mailservrar står utomlands så även om man skickar mail till sin kompis så går trafiken in och ut över gränsen. Den andra är att om man använder de kraftigaste krypteringarna av mail så tar det flera år för de kraftfullaste datorerna att knäcka det.

Det är alltså mycket tveksamt om den tänka övervakningen av mailtrafiken som föreslagits kommer att bli av.

Jag ser inte något krig mot var frihet som pågår då inskränkningar i den frihet som finns alltid ger kraftfulla protester.

Däremot förstår jag varför de som är anhängare av de alternativa idéerna har en uppfattning att de pågår ett krig mot friheten då de alternativa idéerna ofta struntas i eller att de finns uppgifter som går emot dem i vanliga massmedier.

Quote:
Studera lite av mina inlägg. Så fort något dras upp som inte är teorier och spekulationer så lyser skeptikern med sin frånvaro. Varför tystnar skeptikern när jag ställer en rak fråga om saker som inte kan ifrågasättas med er vanliga taktik ?


Quote:

Då kan du väl visa mig den etablerade massmedians rapportering om:
- SAS-soldater i Irak som togs till fånga utklädda till muslimer.
- Den brittiska polisens tillslag mot en vit nationalist och dennes innehav av kemikalier för sprängmedel, raketgevär samt en skyddsdräkt.
- USAs mindre kända relationer med Irak http://www.gp.se/gp/jsp/Crosslink.jsp?d=114&a=318187

Quote:

Du ser inget bekymmer med att frågan om den här sortens övervakning överhuvudtaget tas upp utan folklig debatt och kanske rent av beslutas ovanför våra huvuden. Hela spektaklet kring FRAs övervakning talar sitt tydliga språk om att myndigheterna upphört att vara i folkets tjänst. Du rör dig en bra bit från själva kärnfrågan. Vilken sorts värld vill du ha egentligen ?

Snart är inget längre heligt
http://www.washingtontechnology.com/online/1_1/30434-1.html


Quote:

*host*Patriot Act*host*


Quote:

Eh ? För det första, det enda jag är anhängare av är kampen för en ny oberoende utredning av 9/11 och ett stopp för globalisering. För det andra så rör det sig knappast om "alternativa idéer" från min sida vad gäller krig mot vår frihet. Jag läser de dokument och artiklar som i många fall är skrivna av förövarna själva och drar mina slutsatser utifrån detta. Du lyssnar väl mest på s.k experter på bästa sändningstid

Quote:

En film som tom. amerikansk skolungdom skulle förstå.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7194144485676029519

Quote:

Din j-vla Pajas!

VAR har du sett en debatt i mainstream media med någon drivande person som forskar om alternativa förklaringsmodeller angående historiska händelser som t.ex Estonia-katastrofen, Kennedymordet, Vaccinationskadornas vara eller icke vara, Cemtrails, den s.k. Förintelsen, Massinvandringen, 911, Frimureriets koppling till "Nya världsordningen" och AIDS ursprung osv osv.

De personer som författar alster och forskar inom ovanstående ämnen som t.ex Faurisson, Juri Lina, Lars Adelskogh, Sven Anér, Henning Witte, Alan Cantwell, Michael Collins Piper, Vera Schreider, Lars Jansson, Jordan Maxwell, Alan Watt och Jim Marrs m.fl. förvägras STÄNDIGT mediaexponering och negligeras oupphörligen av mainstreamnedia som bara mal på med de Politiskt korrekta beskrivningarna om att det var Al-Qaida/Bin Laden som låg bakom 911, Oswald som mördade Kennedy, Bogvisiret och den hårda sjön som orsakade "Estoniaolyckan", Småapor i Kongo som låg bakom AIDS osv osv.

Vad i detta anser du zink visar på att det "INTE finns en ensidig rapportering i massmedia"?

Saken är den att du är så i hypnotiskt tillstånd att du inte ens ser det uppenbara zink, att våra medier är PROPAGANDAORGAN för makteliten som använder dessa för att dölja sanningen om historien och styra människors tankar åt det håll som är gynnsamt för deras sjuka megaliomana idéer om kontroll och maktdrömmar.

"Bröd och skådespel åt folket" visste redan de gamla Romarna var den bästa medicinen för att hålla folket i ett halvsovande och passivt tillstånd medans världen rasade runt omkring dem.

Och med dagens digitala TV teknik samt den politiskt korrekt styrda skolväsendet så är det ingen match för eliten att styra folkets tankar åt det håll de önskar.

Artikeln i Pravda är bra!

Men en sak är fel... det står:

"Alexis de Tocqueville wisely observed, “I know of no country in which there is so little independence of mind and real freedom of discussion as in America.”

hehe... vad säger ni... då skulle han ta en titt på Sverige.