Vinklingen är att sanningen kommer komma från NIST om en månad. Men dom har i alla fall citerat Richard Cage
Quote:


http://www.dn.se/DNet/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=148&a=801505

Nu jävlar... Detta ska verkligen bli intressant!

Quote:



Quote:



Quote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
*Predictive-mainstream-massmedia-wtc7-programming*

Asså det här med datamodeller inom forskningen är farlig trend tror jag. Jag menar, man kan ju skriva ett program som ger det svaret man vill när man matar in sina variabler. Så kan man visa flashig 3d animation också.

Tycker det skönaste är den där 3d animationen om pancake collapsen. Där dom har typ 20 våningar inte 110 eller hur många det var. Sen så står coren kvar också =)

The Windsor Building in Madrid Spain 2005.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/windsor.html

Other hi-rise fires
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/compare/fires.html

And they NEVER totally collapse.

Except for 11 September 2001, when 3 hi-rises collapse, one of which burned (very poorly) for under one hour.

Fires Have Never Caused Skyscrapers to Collapse
One Meridian Plaza fire
The One Meridian Plaza fire

Excepting the three 9-11 collapses, no fire, however severe, has ever caused a steel-framed high-rise building to collapse. Following are examples of high-rise fires that were far more severe than those in WTC 1 and 2, and Building 7. In these precedents, the fires consumed multiple floors, produced extensive window breakage, exhibited large areas of emergent flames, and went on for several hours. The fires in the WTC towers did none of these things.
The One Meridian Plaza Fire

One Meridian Plaza is a 38-floor skyscraper in Philadelphia that suffered a severe fire on February 23, 1991. The fire started on the 22nd floor and raged for 18 hours, gutting eight floors and causing an estimated $100 million in direct property loss. 1 2 3 It was later described by Philadelphia officials as "the most significant fire in this century".

The fire caused window breakage, cracking of granite, and failures of spandrel panel connections. 4 Despite the severity and duration of the fire, as evidenced by the damage the building sustained, no part of the building collapsed.
First Interstate Bank fire
The First Interstate Bank fire
The First Interstate Bank Fire

The First Interstate Bank Building is a 62-story skyscraper in Los Angeles that suffered the worst high-rise fire in the city's history. From the late evening of May 4, 1988 through the early morning of the next day, 64 fire companies battled the blaze, which lasted for 3 1/2 hours. The fire caused extensive window breakage, which complicated firefighting efforts. Large flames jutted out of the building during the blaze. Firefighting efforts resulted in massive water damage to floors below the fire, and the fire gutted offices from the 12th to the 16th floor, and caused extensive smoke damage to floors above. The fire caused an estimated $200 million in direct property loss. 5

A report by Iklim Ltd. describes the structural damage from the fire:
In spite of the total burnout of four and a half floors, there was no damage to the main structural members and only minor damage to one secondary beam and a small number of floor pans. 6
The 1 New York Plaza Fire
close-up of First Interstate fire
Close-up of the First Interstate Bank fire
Photo: New York Board of Underwriters

1 New York Plaza is a 50-story office tower less than a mile from the World Trade Center site. It suffered a severe fire and explosion on August 5, 1970. The fire started around 6 PM, and burned for more than 6 hours. 7
Caracas Tower Fire

The tallest skyscraper in Caracas, Venezuela experienced a severe fire on October 17, 2004. The blaze began before midnight on the 34th floor, spread to more than 26 floors, and burned for more than 17 hours. Heat from the fires prevented firefighters from reaching the upper floors, and smoke injured 40 firefighters.

Lax enforcement of fire codes in Venezuela was blamed for the malfunctioning of water pumps and a lack of fire extinguishers inside of the building. Because the building was empty when the fire broke out, no civilians were killed or injured. 8
The Windsor Building Fire
Windsor fire
The Windsor Building fire

The most recent case of a severe high-rise fire is the one that destroyed the Windsor Building in Madrid, Spain on February 12, 2005. The Windsor fire was more severe than any of the other fires described on this page, and the incident has been widely publicized, with comparisons to the fires in the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11/01. However, the Windsor Building, unlike all the buildings mentioned above, was framed in steel-reinforced concrete rather than steel. Hence it is described on a separate page, which notes differences between the response of these different types of structures to fires.

Haha!

Stackars mass media... de behöver hjälp, de kan inte ens LJUGA odentligt!

Men vi kan väl mejla informationen till de, typ PRISONPLANETS article om 911 bloggers svar på artikeln i bbc.

Jag postade den här för 5 min sen.

Nä det här blir ju bara tokigare och tokigare. Snart kommer alla som förstår lite om världen att skratta ihjäl sig. Det är antagligen det de vill så VARNING! Läs INTE den där rapporten när den kommer ut

Vidare så är det värt att notera att eftersom så gott som allt bevismaterial förstördes efteråt (vilket inte alls är misstänkt nej, nej) så kan man ju placera bränderna lite var som helst i byggnaden. Exempelvis precis där det skulle varit naturligt att sätta ut demoleringsladdningar. Tror säkert även de där bränderna var unikt varma och explosiva också.

Tack för ett gott skratt föresten.

Men ni fattar väl att de måste klänga sig fast vid eldteorin, för om de släpper den, så faller hela myten, och allt är över.

Här är den mer utförligare originalartikeln:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7485331.stm

"The Windsor Building in Madrid Spain 2005.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analy ... ompare/windsor.html"


Windsor är väl ett bra exempel på att stål inte klarar av bränder särskilt bra?

Jag tycker så här:

Jag såg den live på tv i Amerika, och då var det snett då.

Ingen stridsplan för att sjuta ner KAPADE flygplan i USA!!!!

Det går inte!!! Bara den!!!

MEN!!!.....

Att fastna med 9-11, jag vet inte, SANNINGEN kanske kommer ut men vaddå?

Vad ledar det till?

CHAOS i USA.

Vad vill NWO ha?

CHAOS.

9-11 var en gateway till det viktiga AFGANISTAN och sen PERMANENTA baser i IRAK.

Det ledde till STORA militära budget och en global militärasering, KRIGET mot TERROR.

Either with us or the terrorists...

So big fucking deal, om sanningen kommer fram, skall de trupperna dras tillbacka?

Ska NATO inte invaderar USA om detr blir för hetta, UN trupper?

You better believe that "THEY" have already planned this waaaaay in advance and are very READY

Så trevligt, vet ni vad jag tycker man borde göra med dom?

Quote: Ja