vaken

Vakencorner




BottomBottom  Previous Topic Previous Topic  Next Topic Next Topic   Register To Post

« 1 ... 17 18 19 (20)


Re: Astro NOTS som inte var på månen


See User information
"Which is the fake stone?
In a scene from the James Bond movie "Quantum of Solace" which was shot at Paranal, James Bond and Camille had to hide behind rocks in the desert landscape (see the video on myspacetv.com).

The rocks that were already there weren't quite right for the production team, so they brought some amazingly detailed fake ones with them! The fake rocks were so realistic that we thought we'd challenge you to tell them apart from the real ones..."


http://www.eso.org/public/outreach/bond/Bondcontest.html

Hahaha! Inga Apollo-prylar på månen, däremot diskuterar de om fejkade stenar.

Kan det ha varit på ett sånt här ställe som de fejkade Apollo-bilderna är tagna? Bilden är från Atacama-öknen i Chile.

Resized Image


"Looking akin to Mars, with its red sand and lack of vegetation, the Atacama Desert is thought to be the driest place on Earth. The high-altitude site and extreme dryness make excellent conditions for astronomical observations. Paranal is home to ESO’s Very Large Telescope, which is the world’s most advanced optical observatory."

Posted on: 2008/11/29 11:01

Edited by miksjo on 2008/11/29 11:22:06
Edited by miksjo on 2008/11/29 11:33:01
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: Astro NOTS som inte var på månen


See User information
Nasa=never a straight answer, hela organisationens toppar består ju av frimurare, liksom alla astronauter som gick på månen. Hur kommer det sig att bilderna på pyramiderna och ansiktet på Mars från 1976 bara blir suddigare och suddigare, det borde ju bli skarpare med tiden som foto utrustningen förbättras. Kan det vara en cover-up där man antingen har varit på Mars och sopat undan alla spår eller att Nasa foto redigerar allt innan det släpps till offentligheten? Det verkar som Nasa döljer mycket i alla fall, enligt Hogland så beror det på att de har ett offentligt rymdprogram och ett hemligt.

Posted on: 2008/11/29 12:33
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Anonym
Re: Astro NOTS som inte var på månen
Quote:

systerhans skrev:
Quote:

zink skrev:
Quote:

systerhans skrev:
Quote:

zink skrev:

Det två forskarna Mijail Vasin och Alexander Sherbakov kan du visa att de har existerat för förra gången vi diskuterade detta gick inte att få fram några säkra data om dem.

T.ex så är den mest kända Alexander Sherbakov en soldat:

http://peoples-history.com/state/stat ... exander_sherbakov/1.shtml

Ännu värre är det med Mijail Vasin som bara nämns tillsammans med Alexander Sherbakov i olika texter men några uppgifter om honom går inte att hitta.


Än värre var det med teorier att månen har haft sprutande vulkaner och var en klump... sådant kan bara komma från Scienzereligionen.

De där personerna, det var inte igår direkt... deras info står i motsättning till Scienzereligionens trossatsbyggande - det heter understrycka, undertrycka och undertrycka. Så kan deras namn stavas på olika sätt, tex är Mijail bara en variant.


Suppressed Inventions & Other Discoveries - True Stories Of Suppression, Scientific Cover-Ups
har ett kapitel:

Did NASA
Sabotage Its
Own Space
Capsule?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/3958757/Sup ... reakthroughs-2001-by-Eise


Tar tex uppom Grissom och citronen, och mycket annat, tex...:

Childress, who claims that the Moon is long inhabited and that Mercury,
Venus, Mars and some of the moons of the outer planets show signs of
current or past inhabitation; We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty
Billion Dollar Swindle! by Bill Kaysing and Randy Reid; and lastly, the
subject of this review, NASA Mooned America! by Rene, the last two
books dealing with a mass of discrepancies in NASA's public output
which the authors take to mean that the Moon shots were faked. All these
books are well worth acquiring to broaden one's outlook on this subject.

It is a big charge to claim that NASA never went to the Moon, that it
was all a fake, yet this man Rene has come up with a large body of infor-
mation that has to be seriously considered. He is obviously not writing
this book for the fun of it, I doubt he's making any money at it, and is sure
to be scorned and ridiculed simply for asking good questions which go
against the common belief.

There have been many books questioning the official story of a dead
Moon, visited only by a few handpicked humans catapulted there in fancy
tin cans. Not necessarily in order of appearance, some of these titles are:
Somebody Else is on the Moon by George H. Leonard, who claims huge
mining machines are moving about on the lunar surface; Our Mysterious
Spaceship Moon and Secrets of our Spaceship Moon both by Don Wilson,
who claims that the Moon is a giant artificial spaceship and is still inhab-
ited; The Moon: Outpost of the Gods by Jean Sendy, who claims that
extraterrestrials used the Moon as an Earth observation post and became
the gods of old as they interfered with human development; Flying Saucers
on the Moon by Riley Hansard Crabb, who claims that the Moon is a fly-
ing saucer base, and goes on to describe moving lights and changing
craters recorded by orthodox astronomers in the 1700s and 1800s;
Moongate: Suppressed Findings of the U.S. Space Program by William L.
Brian II, who claims that the Moon has a heavy gravity (75 percent of
Earth's) and atmosphere, and that a top secret antigravity propulsion sys-
tem was necessary to get on and off the Moon; We Discovered Alien Bases
on the Moon by Fred Steckling, which shows quite a number of startling
NASA photos indicating vegetation, clouds and domed structures on the
Moon. Steckling claims we discovered aliens already there when we got
there, and that NASA just couldn't bear to tell us poor, common mortals
this astounding news; Extraterrestrial Archaeology by David Hatcher...


Annat, det med hollow...:
http://forum.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu ... A48AF3FFE944EA66217654912



Så länge du inte bevisar för mig att de två forskarna Mijail Vasin och Alexander Sherbakov har funnits så faller hela ditt resonemang för du har då för mig presenterat rena myter då jag ska tro på personer som det är mindre troligt att de finns än jultomten.


Månen som en klump med sprutande vulkaner är inför alla vaknas ögon en redan debunkad myt. Tillbed du ditt mikroskop zink...

Den tidigare postade "Our Enigmatic Moon".
här i ny skepnad:


Earth's Moon and Human Evolution

Dr. N Huntley, Ph.D.

It has been established beyond all reasonable doubt that the Moon is not what it appears; that it is not just another satellite orbiting a planet, Earth, but an entity which has thrown the minds of some of the greatest thinkers and scientific brains into a quandary and bewilderment unprecedented in the history of astronomy. Why haven't you heard about this? Another government cover-up? How could Moon mysteries have anything to do with government secrecy, and moreover could it relate to the suppression of the space programme?

Let us outline some of the extraordinary anomalies and mysteries surrounding this puzzle. Clearly not all data will be equally reliable but the abundance of interrelated information nevertheless gives an overall picture which can be determined with some certainty. The first academic enigma must surely be that the Moon is apparently in its wrong orbit for its size. However, this would presumably be based on its assumed density. Technical reports claim a density of 3.3 for the Moon compared with 5.5 for Earth. Astronomy data indicates that the internal regions of the Moon are less dense than the outer, giving rise to the inevitable but outrageous speculation that it could be hollow. The eminent and late scientist Carl Sagan, a typical sceptic, had made the statement, "A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object." But meaning here that if it is hollow, it is not a natural satellite -- and therefore artificial.

Possibly the strongest evidence for it to be a 'hollow object' comes from the fact that when meteors strike the Moon, the latter rings like a bell. More specifically when the Apollo crew in November 20, 1969 released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with the Moon caused their seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation like a bell for more than an hour. The same effect occurred with Apollo 13's third stage which caused the Moon to ring for over three hours. So what's going on with the Moon?

Two Soviet scientists, Mikhail Vasin and Alexander Shcherbakov, have spent much of their careers examining the facts compiled on lunar phenomena. Their conclusion is that the Moon is artificial, possibly a hollowed-out planet, and that it was steered from some distant region of the galaxy into a circular orbit around our planet (hence the extraordinary mystery of rock and Moon-dust age variations). They claim that intellectual life has existed in the Moon for eons.

In 1968 as Apollo 8 moved into orbit around the Moon, the astronauts spotted a colossal extraterrestrial object, which then had disappeared on the next orbit. Photographs were taken, of course, but not released to the public. On another occasion when the lunar excursion module was down to 4-5 miles from the Moon's surface astronauts witnessed a UFO suddenly rise from a crater and rapidly disappear. In 1969, "Buzz" Aldrin was checking the lunar surface from orbit, when two UFOs appeared, moved towards the Apollo rocket, hovered nearby, then to Aldrin's utter astonishment the UFOs joined to form one entity.

Furthermore, astronauts of Apollo 11 saw a spacefleet of UFOs lined up in a crater. Almost every Moon mission involved encounters with UFOs or UFO sightings, not to mention the discovery of many bases on the Moon's surface. Renowned astronomer Patrick Moore discovered over one hundred dome-like buildings. In fact, about one thousand such bases, dome-like structures of diameter around 700 feet, have been witnessed. Astronomy records extending back 200 years indicate no such artefacts until about the 1950s (remember the book entitledAlternative III?). Many of the UFO encounters by the astronauts were stated to be of a positive nature in which unintrusive assistance was given.

It has been found that asteroids and meteors not only create shallow craters on the Moon's surface but produce a convex floor to the crater instead of concave as expected, supporting the idea of a rigid shell. Countless other pieces of evidence from astronomers and NASA scientists began to reveal that some 2-3 miles down there appear to be dense layers of metal -- which would explain why the craters were convex. But the most astonishing conclusion is that the only theory which can completely explain all the anomalies is that the Moon is hollow with a shell about 20 miles thick --mostly metal. Note that mascons (higher concentrations of mass) found in the marias cause fluctuations in gravity and have never been satisfactorily explained.

Moreover, these structural anomalies were supported by two publications, one Time Magazine, which unwittingly revealed the gravity value of the Moon relative to Earth by publishing the distance from Earth to Moon of the null point between them, indicating a gravitational force some 60 -70 % of Earth. Furthermore, some people noticed the feeble plumage of the rocket exhaust as the module rose from the Moon's surface---explained away by NASA as due to the vacuum. But what about some of the telltale and suspicious features observed during the first Armstrong and Aldrin Moon landing.

The American flag was seen briefly to wave in... a breeze? But we are told there is no air on the Moon. The flag was then starched. Also we saw dust kicked up by the astronauts clearly drifting in... what? Dust particles do not drift in vacuum -- they cling together. And what about the feeble leaps of the astronauts off the Moon's surface -- were their spacesuits and backpacks really so heavy? The Moon is supposed to be about one-sixth the gravity of Earth.

Thus we now know that air is present, and the feeble rocket exhaust could not be due to a vacuum. Moreover, the exhaust was apparently too weak to account for the necessary power to escape from such a gravitational pull in relationship to the size of the module, which was not large enough to contain the necessary fuel to escape the Moon's high gravity. Was antigravity propulsion secretly being used as a booster?

The covert government have long since sent 'astronauts' into outer space in antigravity spacecrafts. They apparently had the so-called cosmospheres about 40 years ago, some larger than the old and massive dirigibles. They seized the antigravity research data from the Nazis, and have since then reverse-engineered captured spacecrafts and negotiated deals with aliens involving antigravity technologies.

The more thorough have been the investigations of the Moon the more bizarre the results have been. Probably one of the most startling was that moonquakes occurred like clockwork. Moreover, the fluctuations on each occasion were the same. This is impossible for natural conditions which always obey fractal distributions. Furthermore, a study of rock samples reveal an age of 5.3 billion years, and that not only is the Moon older than the Earth, estimated to be about 4.6 billion years, but that it is older than the solar system (and by theoretical standards as old as the universe).

What about the surface of the Moon? Several television viewers wrote explaining that they spotted one of the astronauts pick up what appeared to be a glass bottle and remark, "My God, I don't believe it, look at this ..." Then the television screen went blank. Other viewers observed the extreme difficulty astronauts had when drilling down a few inches into the Moon's marias and that when the drill bit was pulled out, metal shavings were visible. Rocks were found to contain brass, mica, titanium, and elements uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 not previously found in nature.

Astronomy literature reports the sighting of a 12-mile bridge-like structure over the Sea of Crisis in 1954 by John O'Neile, and in the 1950s astronomer Morris K. Jessup realised that UFOs had bases on the Moon (and so does the government of course). Other strange lunar phenomena are: the observation by Dr. Frank Harris of a black body on the surface, 250 miles long and 50 miles wide; clouds and lightning; strange moving shadows and objects, and spire-like structures thousands of feet high; a huge boulder with tracks (behind it) from inside a crater to the rim (uphill); the shrinking, over a period of time, of the crater Luna from six miles in diameter to one and a half miles; 'hill' effects in craters appearing and disappearing in a few hours; over 800 substantial observations made by scientists of blinking and flashing lights; the results of NASA photographs of the lunar surface, indicating several large pyramid structures, strange rifts in the surface with entrances, massive girders, machinery and some 1000 kilometre blocks of metal, alongside tears in the surface. This reveals massive subsurface interior 'plumbing', huge crosses a mile long, and enormous excavating equipment.

Professional astronomers have gradually been discouraged from investigating these observations, referred to as Transient Lunar Phenomena, and all such Fortean observations are now only of interest to the amateur.

Our satellite has long since been established as being extremely dry but this information has been contradicted by the appearance of clouds on the surface. On one occasion a cloud of water vapour appeared covering more than 100 square miles. And it has been reported that strange clouds appear at lightning speed. The capture theory that the Moon was pulled into its orbit by the Earth was once favoured but the circular orbit of the Moon invalidated it. As already mentioned the Moon is the wrong size and in the wrong orbit. It is too big and too far out. It does not rotate relative to Earth; the same side always faces the Earth. And what about the amazing 'coincidence' of the eclipse phenomenon. The position and size of the Moon is precisely that necessary to eclipse the Sun's disc.

Scientific experts, including NASA investigators believe that the Moon is hollow -- it is the only explanation. The velocity of sound has been found to increase with depth and at 40 miles it is too fast for the speed of propagation through rock substance.

'Spaceship Moon' is the brainchild of the two Soviet researchers but many others agree with the theory, including NASA scientists at JPL and an Oxford University physicist. The capture theory is now back in favour but with a significant adjustment that the Moon was steered into orbit.

It might be worth a comment on the recent 'conspiracy theory' that astronauts never actually went to the Moon. DVDs and television programmes have proffered that, in particular, photographs allegedly taken on the Moon were faked. In fact one can see clearly in the photographs that the shadows of objects on the Moon were not parallel as they would be if the shadows were cast by the Sun, rather than by studio lighting. Further evidence has been given. But we may know from earlier suspicions that NASA has a propensity for faking scenes -- for example, the view of the interior of the shuttle faking an outer-space mission when actually on the ground. Thus the conclusion, and personal opinion of the author, is that both scenarios are correct: astronauts did land on the Moon, and NASA has produced faked photographs.

Was the space programme cut because further encounters with UFOs might blow the government cover-up? Even more important than this, allowing the public to increase their confront and interest in the subject of Extraterrestrials would eventually lead to a worldwide awakening of the human race's true heritage, the causes of our downfall, the falsification of our history, and ultimately the disclosure and eradication of the control mechanism.

We see that the Moon mysteries are intimately bound up with extraterrestrial sightings and involvement, in particular, the conclusion of the two Russian scientists that the Moon is artificial and hollow. Is this a favourable omen for the human race or a harbinger of something more ominous. Why was the Moon directed to retain continuously a dark side? A side of the Moon we never see. Also police records referring to increased crime during the full Moon are commonplace. A study of ET material of which literature today abounds, strongly indicates that the nature of the Moon has a sinister purpose and plays a role in manipulating man's evolution.

Editor's Note:

Adapted and originally published in December 2005 as "Our Enigmatic Moon".

............

Det du kallar för "hela ditt resonemang" - är tvärtom fakta enligt studier och forskning, eller hur?


"Data and computations – among them, Dr. McDonald's motion studies, – point to the conclusion that our moon is internally hollow to a great extent.

Since most scientists claim there is no natural explanation for such peculiar phenomenon (because satellite worlds are not naturally hollow), the inevitable conclusion indicates that the moon is artificially hollow." (7)

Once again, the "establishment" scientists are trying to "fit" the facts to their "sacred cow" theory. In no way will they "buck" the system and admit the obvious. The facts, once again, support the theory laid out by Gardner and Reed all heavenly bodies are hollow.

Hela:
Hollow Moon?
http://www.onelight.com/thei/hollowmoon.html

............


Gör lite hemläxa:

Brian - Moongate - Suppressed Findings of the U.S. Space Program

This is William L. Brian II's explosive book Moongate - Suppressed Findings of the U.S. Space Program - The NASA-Military Cover-Up (1982) which is probably the best book on the topic of suppressed findings of Apollo project and the secret technology that was used to put a man on the Moon. The author compiled evidence from unclassified sources including official government publications, NASA photographs and movies, news articles, and books by authorities in various fields. Written for the layman and scientist alike, with mathematical calculations included in the appendices, it gives documented evidence for: NASA's true link to secret military space operations; secret weapons developed under the cover of the civilian space program; suppressed gravity research discoveries; the real U.S.-Russian space race; secret discoveries that put Apollo astronauts on the Moon; the Moon's true nature and history and the great energy cover-up. In contrast to other similar books Brian doesn't state that noone ever visited the Moon but that significantly different technology was used to achieve this momentous feat and how it has being held from us for decades. Furthermore Moongate exposes many cover-ups that occured during the missions that fail to match reality when put under closer investigation. You've seen Watergate now it's time to face Moongate. 230 pages, some pictures. A must read from everyone.

http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/43399 ... of_the_U.S._Space_Program


Brian - Moongate - Suppressed Findings of the U.S. Space Program

Kanske den seedas här istället:

http://www.torrentreactor.net/torrent ... -of-the-U-S-Space-Program

 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Anonym
Re: Astro NOTS som inte var på månen
Quote:

systerhans skrev:
Quote:

zink skrev:
Quote:

systerhans skrev:
Quote:

zink skrev:

Det två forskarna Mijail Vasin och Alexander Sherbakov kan du visa att de har existerat för förra gången vi diskuterade detta gick inte att få fram några säkra data om dem.

T.ex så är den mest kända Alexander Sherbakov en soldat:

http://peoples-history.com/state/stat ... exander_sherbakov/1.shtml

Ännu värre är det med Mijail Vasin som bara nämns tillsammans med Alexander Sherbakov i olika texter men några uppgifter om honom går inte att hitta.


Än värre var det med teorier att månen har haft sprutande vulkaner och var en klump... sådant kan bara komma från Scienzereligionen.

De där personerna, det var inte igår direkt... deras info står i motsättning till Scienzereligionens trossatsbyggande - det heter understrycka, undertrycka och undertrycka. Så kan deras namn stavas på olika sätt, tex är Mijail bara en variant.


Suppressed Inventions & Other Discoveries - True Stories Of Suppression, Scientific Cover-Ups
har ett kapitel:

Did NASA
Sabotage Its
Own Space
Capsule?
http://www.scribd.com/doc/3958757/Sup ... reakthroughs-2001-by-Eise


Tar tex uppom Grissom och citronen, och mycket annat, tex...:

Childress, who claims that the Moon is long inhabited and that Mercury,
Venus, Mars and some of the moons of the outer planets show signs of
current or past inhabitation; We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty
Billion Dollar Swindle! by Bill Kaysing and Randy Reid; and lastly, the
subject of this review, NASA Mooned America! by Rene, the last two
books dealing with a mass of discrepancies in NASA's public output
which the authors take to mean that the Moon shots were faked. All these
books are well worth acquiring to broaden one's outlook on this subject.

It is a big charge to claim that NASA never went to the Moon, that it
was all a fake, yet this man Rene has come up with a large body of infor-
mation that has to be seriously considered. He is obviously not writing
this book for the fun of it, I doubt he's making any money at it, and is sure
to be scorned and ridiculed simply for asking good questions which go
against the common belief.

There have been many books questioning the official story of a dead
Moon, visited only by a few handpicked humans catapulted there in fancy
tin cans. Not necessarily in order of appearance, some of these titles are:
Somebody Else is on the Moon by George H. Leonard, who claims huge
mining machines are moving about on the lunar surface; Our Mysterious
Spaceship Moon and Secrets of our Spaceship Moon both by Don Wilson,
who claims that the Moon is a giant artificial spaceship and is still inhab-
ited; The Moon: Outpost of the Gods by Jean Sendy, who claims that
extraterrestrials used the Moon as an Earth observation post and became
the gods of old as they interfered with human development; Flying Saucers
on the Moon by Riley Hansard Crabb, who claims that the Moon is a fly-
ing saucer base, and goes on to describe moving lights and changing
craters recorded by orthodox astronomers in the 1700s and 1800s;
Moongate: Suppressed Findings of the U.S. Space Program by William L.
Brian II, who claims that the Moon has a heavy gravity (75 percent of
Earth's) and atmosphere, and that a top secret antigravity propulsion sys-
tem was necessary to get on and off the Moon; We Discovered Alien Bases
on the Moon by Fred Steckling, which shows quite a number of startling
NASA photos indicating vegetation, clouds and domed structures on the
Moon. Steckling claims we discovered aliens already there when we got
there, and that NASA just couldn't bear to tell us poor, common mortals
this astounding news; Extraterrestrial Archaeology by David Hatcher...


Annat, det med hollow...:
http://forum.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu ... A48AF3FFE944EA66217654912



Så länge du inte bevisar för mig att de två forskarna Mijail Vasin och Alexander Sherbakov har funnits så faller hela ditt resonemang för du har då för mig presenterat rena myter då jag ska tro på personer som det är mindre troligt att de finns än jultomten.


Månen som en klump med sprutande vulkaner är inför alla vaknas ögon en redan debunkad myt. Tillbed du ditt mikroskop zink...

Den tidigare postade "Our Enigmatic Moon".
här i ny skepnad:


Earth's Moon and Human Evolution

Dr. N Huntley, Ph.D.

It has been established beyond all reasonable doubt that the Moon is not what it appears; that it is not just another satellite orbiting a planet, Earth, but an entity which has thrown the minds of some of the greatest thinkers and scientific brains into a quandary and bewilderment unprecedented in the history of astronomy. Why haven't you heard about this? Another government cover-up? How could Moon mysteries have anything to do with government secrecy, and moreover could it relate to the suppression of the space programme?

Let us outline some of the extraordinary anomalies and mysteries surrounding this puzzle. Clearly not all data will be equally reliable but the abundance of interrelated information nevertheless gives an overall picture which can be determined with some certainty. The first academic enigma must surely be that the Moon is apparently in its wrong orbit for its size. However, this would presumably be based on its assumed density. Technical reports claim a density of 3.3 for the Moon compared with 5.5 for Earth. Astronomy data indicates that the internal regions of the Moon are less dense than the outer, giving rise to the inevitable but outrageous speculation that it could be hollow. The eminent and late scientist Carl Sagan, a typical sceptic, had made the statement, "A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object." But meaning here that if it is hollow, it is not a natural satellite -- and therefore artificial.

Possibly the strongest evidence for it to be a 'hollow object' comes from the fact that when meteors strike the Moon, the latter rings like a bell. More specifically when the Apollo crew in November 20, 1969 released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with the Moon caused their seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation like a bell for more than an hour. The same effect occurred with Apollo 13's third stage which caused the Moon to ring for over three hours. So what's going on with the Moon?

Two Soviet scientists, Mikhail Vasin and Alexander Shcherbakov, have spent much of their careers examining the facts compiled on lunar phenomena. Their conclusion is that the Moon is artificial, possibly a hollowed-out planet, and that it was steered from some distant region of the galaxy into a circular orbit around our planet (hence the extraordinary mystery of rock and Moon-dust age variations). They claim that intellectual life has existed in the Moon for eons.

In 1968 as Apollo 8 moved into orbit around the Moon, the astronauts spotted a colossal extraterrestrial object, which then had disappeared on the next orbit. Photographs were taken, of course, but not released to the public. On another occasion when the lunar excursion module was down to 4-5 miles from the Moon's surface astronauts witnessed a UFO suddenly rise from a crater and rapidly disappear. In 1969, "Buzz" Aldrin was checking the lunar surface from orbit, when two UFOs appeared, moved towards the Apollo rocket, hovered nearby, then to Aldrin's utter astonishment the UFOs joined to form one entity.

Furthermore, astronauts of Apollo 11 saw a spacefleet of UFOs lined up in a crater. Almost every Moon mission involved encounters with UFOs or UFO sightings, not to mention the discovery of many bases on the Moon's surface. Renowned astronomer Patrick Moore discovered over one hundred dome-like buildings. In fact, about one thousand such bases, dome-like structures of diameter around 700 feet, have been witnessed. Astronomy records extending back 200 years indicate no such artefacts until about the 1950s (remember the book entitledAlternative III?). Many of the UFO encounters by the astronauts were stated to be of a positive nature in which unintrusive assistance was given.

It has been found that asteroids and meteors not only create shallow craters on the Moon's surface but produce a convex floor to the crater instead of concave as expected, supporting the idea of a rigid shell. Countless other pieces of evidence from astronomers and NASA scientists began to reveal that some 2-3 miles down there appear to be dense layers of metal -- which would explain why the craters were convex. But the most astonishing conclusion is that the only theory which can completely explain all the anomalies is that the Moon is hollow with a shell about 20 miles thick --mostly metal. Note that mascons (higher concentrations of mass) found in the marias cause fluctuations in gravity and have never been satisfactorily explained.

Moreover, these structural anomalies were supported by two publications, one Time Magazine, which unwittingly revealed the gravity value of the Moon relative to Earth by publishing the distance from Earth to Moon of the null point between them, indicating a gravitational force some 60 -70 % of Earth. Furthermore, some people noticed the feeble plumage of the rocket exhaust as the module rose from the Moon's surface---explained away by NASA as due to the vacuum. But what about some of the telltale and suspicious features observed during the first Armstrong and Aldrin Moon landing.

The American flag was seen briefly to wave in... a breeze? But we are told there is no air on the Moon. The flag was then starched. Also we saw dust kicked up by the astronauts clearly drifting in... what? Dust particles do not drift in vacuum -- they cling together. And what about the feeble leaps of the astronauts off the Moon's surface -- were their spacesuits and backpacks really so heavy? The Moon is supposed to be about one-sixth the gravity of Earth.

Thus we now know that air is present, and the feeble rocket exhaust could not be due to a vacuum. Moreover, the exhaust was apparently too weak to account for the necessary power to escape from such a gravitational pull in relationship to the size of the module, which was not large enough to contain the necessary fuel to escape the Moon's high gravity. Was antigravity propulsion secretly being used as a booster?

The covert government have long since sent 'astronauts' into outer space in antigravity spacecrafts. They apparently had the so-called cosmospheres about 40 years ago, some larger than the old and massive dirigibles. They seized the antigravity research data from the Nazis, and have since then reverse-engineered captured spacecrafts and negotiated deals with aliens involving antigravity technologies.

The more thorough have been the investigations of the Moon the more bizarre the results have been. Probably one of the most startling was that moonquakes occurred like clockwork. Moreover, the fluctuations on each occasion were the same. This is impossible for natural conditions which always obey fractal distributions. Furthermore, a study of rock samples reveal an age of 5.3 billion years, and that not only is the Moon older than the Earth, estimated to be about 4.6 billion years, but that it is older than the solar system (and by theoretical standards as old as the universe).

What about the surface of the Moon? Several television viewers wrote explaining that they spotted one of the astronauts pick up what appeared to be a glass bottle and remark, "My God, I don't believe it, look at this ..." Then the television screen went blank. Other viewers observed the extreme difficulty astronauts had when drilling down a few inches into the Moon's marias and that when the drill bit was pulled out, metal shavings were visible. Rocks were found to contain brass, mica, titanium, and elements uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 not previously found in nature.

Astronomy literature reports the sighting of a 12-mile bridge-like structure over the Sea of Crisis in 1954 by John O'Neile, and in the 1950s astronomer Morris K. Jessup realised that UFOs had bases on the Moon (and so does the government of course). Other strange lunar phenomena are: the observation by Dr. Frank Harris of a black body on the surface, 250 miles long and 50 miles wide; clouds and lightning; strange moving shadows and objects, and spire-like structures thousands of feet high; a huge boulder with tracks (behind it) from inside a crater to the rim (uphill); the shrinking, over a period of time, of the crater Luna from six miles in diameter to one and a half miles; 'hill' effects in craters appearing and disappearing in a few hours; over 800 substantial observations made by scientists of blinking and flashing lights; the results of NASA photographs of the lunar surface, indicating several large pyramid structures, strange rifts in the surface with entrances, massive girders, machinery and some 1000 kilometre blocks of metal, alongside tears in the surface. This reveals massive subsurface interior 'plumbing', huge crosses a mile long, and enormous excavating equipment.

Professional astronomers have gradually been discouraged from investigating these observations, referred to as Transient Lunar Phenomena, and all such Fortean observations are now only of interest to the amateur.

Our satellite has long since been established as being extremely dry but this information has been contradicted by the appearance of clouds on the surface. On one occasion a cloud of water vapour appeared covering more than 100 square miles. And it has been reported that strange clouds appear at lightning speed. The capture theory that the Moon was pulled into its orbit by the Earth was once favoured but the circular orbit of the Moon invalidated it. As already mentioned the Moon is the wrong size and in the wrong orbit. It is too big and too far out. It does not rotate relative to Earth; the same side always faces the Earth. And what about the amazing 'coincidence' of the eclipse phenomenon. The position and size of the Moon is precisely that necessary to eclipse the Sun's disc.

Scientific experts, including NASA investigators believe that the Moon is hollow -- it is the only explanation. The velocity of sound has been found to increase with depth and at 40 miles it is too fast for the speed of propagation through rock substance.

'Spaceship Moon' is the brainchild of the two Soviet researchers but many others agree with the theory, including NASA scientists at JPL and an Oxford University physicist. The capture theory is now back in favour but with a significant adjustment that the Moon was steered into orbit.

It might be worth a comment on the recent 'conspiracy theory' that astronauts never actually went to the Moon. DVDs and television programmes have proffered that, in particular, photographs allegedly taken on the Moon were faked. In fact one can see clearly in the photographs that the shadows of objects on the Moon were not parallel as they would be if the shadows were cast by the Sun, rather than by studio lighting. Further evidence has been given. But we may know from earlier suspicions that NASA has a propensity for faking scenes -- for example, the view of the interior of the shuttle faking an outer-space mission when actually on the ground. Thus the conclusion, and personal opinion of the author, is that both scenarios are correct: astronauts did land on the Moon, and NASA has produced faked photographs.

Was the space programme cut because further encounters with UFOs might blow the government cover-up? Even more important than this, allowing the public to increase their confront and interest in the subject of Extraterrestrials would eventually lead to a worldwide awakening of the human race's true heritage, the causes of our downfall, the falsification of our history, and ultimately the disclosure and eradication of the control mechanism.

We see that the Moon mysteries are intimately bound up with extraterrestrial sightings and involvement, in particular, the conclusion of the two Russian scientists that the Moon is artificial and hollow. Is this a favourable omen for the human race or a harbinger of something more ominous. Why was the Moon directed to retain continuously a dark side? A side of the Moon we never see. Also police records referring to increased crime during the full Moon are commonplace. A study of ET material of which literature today abounds, strongly indicates that the nature of the Moon has a sinister purpose and plays a role in manipulating man's evolution.

Editor's Note:

Adapted and originally published in December 2005 as "Our Enigmatic Moon".

............

Det du kallar för "hela ditt resonemang" - är tvärtom fakta enligt studier och forskning, eller hur?


"Data and computations – among them, Dr. McDonald's motion studies, – point to the conclusion that our moon is internally hollow to a great extent.

Since most scientists claim there is no natural explanation for such peculiar phenomenon (because satellite worlds are not naturally hollow), the inevitable conclusion indicates that the moon is artificially hollow." (7)

Once again, the "establishment" scientists are trying to "fit" the facts to their "sacred cow" theory. In no way will they "buck" the system and admit the obvious. The facts, once again, support the theory laid out by Gardner and Reed all heavenly bodies are hollow.

Hela:
Hollow Moon?
http://www.onelight.com/thei/hollowmoon.html

............


Gör lite hemläxa:

Brian - Moongate - Suppressed Findings of the U.S. Space Program

This is William L. Brian II's explosive book Moongate - Suppressed Findings of the U.S. Space Program - The NASA-Military Cover-Up (1982) which is probably the best book on the topic of suppressed findings of Apollo project and the secret technology that was used to put a man on the Moon. The author compiled evidence from unclassified sources including official government publications, NASA photographs and movies, news articles, and books by authorities in various fields. Written for the layman and scientist alike, with mathematical calculations included in the appendices, it gives documented evidence for: NASA's true link to secret military space operations; secret weapons developed under the cover of the civilian space program; suppressed gravity research discoveries; the real U.S.-Russian space race; secret discoveries that put Apollo astronauts on the Moon; the Moon's true nature and history and the great energy cover-up. In contrast to other similar books Brian doesn't state that noone ever visited the Moon but that significantly different technology was used to achieve this momentous feat and how it has being held from us for decades. Furthermore Moongate exposes many cover-ups that occured during the missions that fail to match reality when put under closer investigation. You've seen Watergate now it's time to face Moongate. 230 pages, some pictures. A must read from everyone.

http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/43399 ... of_the_U.S._Space_Program


Brian - Moongate - Suppressed Findings of the U.S. Space Program

Kanske den seedas här istället:

http://www.torrentreactor.net/torrent ... -of-the-U-S-Space-Program

 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: Astro NOTS som inte var på månen


See User information
En av mina (Novax) favorittrådar, ihåliga saker är bäst, såsom månen och admins. På månen har ju Avdelningen den beryktade Bas 43, för de svårast komadrabbade. Där är just nu full aktivitet.

Glad Påsk:

A Hidden Mission for Apollo 17?

http://keithlaney.net/Ahiddenmission/A17HMp1.html

Posted on: 2010/4/3 22:23
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 


Re: Astro NOTS som inte var på månen
Varning: Bråkstake och Snick Snackare
Varning: Bråkstake och Snick Snackare


See User information
Quote:

Lizzard-Bling skrev:
Quote:

novax skrev:
Brian forskar om partiklar, blir då en så kallad
partikelforskare.


Vart forskar han någonstans?
Vart är rapporterna som Iosif Shklovsky skrev som skulle "bevisa" att mars månar var ihåliga?

Du kan ju som sagt var hitta på allt detta!


Det var från inlägg 97... Lizzard-Bling och zpz2 är nog inte kvar, science är debunkad och de drog...

Lizzard ville där och i vidare inlägg inte tro på det där med Shklovsky, utan promotar fantasier.

Nåväl.

Här kan man läsa om honom:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iosif_Samuilovich_Shklovsky

Står även i http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobos_(moon)

+

This idea -- that Phobos could be an "intelligently-created, giant spacecraft ... a space station ... orbiting Mars" -- is not new; after Hall's initial discovery of "Phobos" (fear) and Deimos (terror) at the US Naval Observatory, in 1877, the earliest, scientific proposal of this idea -- that Phobos itself was "an actual 'space station' ... now slowly spiraling into Mars because it was actually a manufactured, hollow object ... and thereby, subject to even the slight atmospheric drag thousands of miles above Mars ..." -- was first published in 1958. Its author was the well-known Russian astrophysicist, and acclaimed member of the Soviet Academy of Sciences, Iosif Samuilovich Shklovsky.

In 1966, my late colleague and friend, Carl Sagan -- acting as Shlovsky's "US translator and editor" -- published an "expanded" Western Edition of Shklovsky's work ... titled in English "Intelligent Life in the Universe."

http://www.enterprisemission.com/Phobos2.html

Vakna zz:s!


/Novax

Posted on: 2010/7/9 1:36
 Top  Twitter  Facebook  Google Plus  Linkedin  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Mr. Wong 




« 1 ... 17 18 19 (20)




dvd-infobeställning banner längst ned.
Ikoner
Paypal
Stötta Vaken med en månatlig donation
Facebook
Gå även med i vår facebook-grupp och bli en av de över 15 000 som diskuterar där.
Login
Annonsorer och reklam
Annonser:






Annonsorer och reklam 2


Creeper MediaCreeper
Vilka är Online
43 user(s) are online (43 user(s) are browsing Forum)

Members: 0
Guests: 43

more...
Nya medlemmar
test_user
test_user
01/01/2020
brifrida 09/05/2019
Turbozz 08/15/2019
Fr4nzz0n 07/30/2019
Egenerfarenhett 05/19/2019
Bloggar o Länkar

I11time.dk
911 Truth i Danmark.
Se verkligheten
Dissekerar skildringar från massmedia.
Den dolda agendan
Nyheter på svenska.
Klarsikt
Mats Sederholm & Linda Bjuvgård.
Dominic Johansson
Hjälp Dominic att komma hem.
Mjölkpallen
Mjölkpallen är samlingsplatsen där bonnförnuftet tros ha sitt säte.
911truth.no
911 Truth i Norge.
Nyhetsspeilet.no
Nyheter på norska.
En bild säger mer ...
Citat från eliten som bilder.
Folkvet
Sanningen är dold bland lögnerna
Fred & Frihet
Geoengineering.se
Hur påverkar geoengineering dig?
Grundläggande frihetsbegrepp på svenska

RSS