Filipino-Monkey skrev:
Vad jag tror om svininfluensan är denna.

2003 SARS dyker upp. SARS kickar igång memen "pandemi" Massa tvprogram och dokumentärer görs. Debatt förs av WHO, EU, Regeringar osv.
Sen kommer fågel influensan som en liten påminelese man dödar fåglar i hela asien och debatten fortsätter. Det läcker ut en lista på vilka som skulel få ett vaccin och vilka som inte skulel få det i sverige. Det skapar tryck på politiker att dom måste fixa så att alla blir vaccinerade för att "Alla ska med". Man skapar beredskap för en influensa pandemi och protokol uppförs.

2008. Det flesta rika länder har beredskap mot pandemi och färdiga protokol som ska följas såvida vissa vilkor uppförs. Läkemedels industrin skapar det här nya konstiga viruset och släpper lös det. Det trigger automatiskt alla protokol som finns, kort därefter beställs vaccin produktion värd multimiljarders dollar. Argument för regeringar att göra beställningarna.
* Medmänsklighet : Ta hand om sina medborgare för att kunna visa att den styrande regering går att lita på i en kris.
* Ekonomi: Man behöver folk på sina arbetsplatser för naringsliv och för att doms ka betala skatter.

2010
Viruset var i princip ofarligt vaccinet skapade mer skada både hälso mässigt och ekonomiskt än influensan hade gjort. Inte många tog vaccinet men hela etablissemanget försvar fortfarande sitt beteende. Förtroende för EU, Regeringen, FN minskar ännu mer.


2011
Bilderberg mötet: Man disktuerar i den yttrekretsen hur man ska kunna genomföra en vaccination om en mycket värre influensa skulle dyka upp. Senare på året stiftar EU ett s.k pandemipaket där det står att alla har rätt till vaccin och att alla måste ta det för att inte smitta andra. Samt att EUs nya federala polis och miltär ska leda en sådan operation över hela EU.

Eftersom förtroende för etablissemanget är på ett nytt botten rekord så blir det stora protester på gator och i media och vissa regeringar vägrar att lyda direktivet.

2012 höst/vinter influensa tider
Ett nytt lab virus sprids med 90% dödlighet. Det länder som följde eus direktiv får tag på ett snabbframteget vaccin som räddar större delean av befolkningen medans asien afrika ryssland och dom andra olydiga länderna lider stora förluster.

2012 December 21
Första zombie attacken i stockholm.....

abbadon skrev:
Svininfluensan är ännu en gåta för mig, några frågor som jag ställer mig själv o skulle vilja hitta konkreta svar på.

1: varför dena hets jakt på att alla ska vaccinera sig?
2: svininfluensan döda mindre än förkylning osv så varför sån hög beredskaps nivå?
3: WHO måste veta något som inte vi vet eller hintar om.
4: Låt oss säga om svininfluensan är överreagerat, kommer WHO då få existera för ingen kommer ta de på allvar längre.

Några av de jag undrar över.
Personligen tror jag att svininfluensan är rent skit snack samt folk märker inte skillnad på vanliga influensan o svininfluensan, så springer folk o testar sig så då undrar man över själva testningen fungerar och sker en vaccination då?.

Almost 80 percent of American casualties in the First World War came not from enemy fire, but from flu. In some units the mortality rate was as high as 80 percent.
Swine flu arose as a normal, nonlethal flu in the spring of 1918, but somehow over the following months—no one knows how or where—it mutated into something more severe. A fifth of victims suffered only mild symptoms, but the rest became gravely ill and often died. Some succumbed within hours; others held on for a few days.
In the United States, the first deaths were recorded among sailors in Boston in late August 1918, but the epidemic quickly spread to all parts of the country. Schools closed, public entertainments were shut down, people everywhere wore masks. It did little good. Between the autumn of 1918 and spring of the following year, 548,452 people died of the flu in America. The toll in Britain was 220,000, with similar numbers dead in France and Germany. No one knows the global toll, as records in the Third World were often poor, but it was not less than 20 million and probably more like 50 million. Some estimates have put the global total as high as 100 million.
In an attempt to devise a vaccine, medical authorities conducted tests on volunteers at a military prison on Deer Island in Boston Harbor. The prisoners were promised pardons if they survived a battery of tests. These tests were rigorous to say the least. First the subjects were injected with infected lung tissue taken from the dead and then sprayed in the eyes, nose, and mouth with infectious aerosols. If they still failed to succumb, they had their throats swabbed with discharges taken from the sick and dying. If all else failed, they were required to sit open-mouthed while a gravely ill victim was helped to cough into their faces.
Out of—somewhat amazingly—three hundred men who volunteered, the doctors chose sixty-two for the tests. None contracted the flu—not one. The only person who did grow ill was the ward doctor, who swiftly died. The probable explanation for this is that the epidemic had passed through the prison a few weeks earlier and the volunteers, all of whom had survived that visitation, had a natural immunity.
Much about the 1918 flu is understood poorly or not at all. One mystery is how it erupted suddenly, all over, in places separated by oceans, mountain ranges, and other earthly
impediments. A virus can survive for no more than a few hours outside a host body, so how could it appear in Madrid, Bombay, and Philadelphia all in the same week?
The probable answer is that it was incubated and spread by people who had only slight symptoms or none at all. Even in normal outbreaks, about 10 percent of people have the flu but are unaware of it because they experience no ill effects. And because they remain in circulation they tend to be the great spreaders of the disease.
That would account for the 1918 outbreak’s widespread distribution, but it still doesn’t explain how it managed to lay low for several months before erupting so explosively at more or less the same time all over. Even more mysterious is that it was primarily devastating to people in the prime of life. Flu normally is hardest on infants and the elderly, but in the 1918 outbreak deaths were overwhelmingly among people in their twenties and thirties. Older people may have benefited from resistance gained from an earlier exposure to the same strain, but why the very young were similarly spared is unknown. The greatest mystery of all is why the 1918 flu was so ferociously deadly when most flus are not. We still have no idea.
From time to time certain strains of virus return. A disagreeable Russian virus known as H1N1 caused severe outbreaks over wide areas in 1933, then again in the 1950s, and yet again in the 1970s. Where it went in the meantime each time is uncertain. One suggestion is that viruses hide out unnoticed in populations of wild animals before trying their hand at a new generation of humans. No one can rule out the possibility that the Great Swine Flu epidemic might once again rear its head.

Filipino-Monkey skrev:
2012 December 21
Första zombie attacken i stockholm.....