The French philosopher and sociologist Professor Jacques Ellul argued that all fiction that is marketed is, in reality, propaganda. I would not go quite that far, but a great deal of what is poured out through books, newspapers, radio, television, and similar media is undoubtedly the kind of material that brainwashes and programs people to move in a particular direction. Just before the Second World War, the markets in both Britain and the United States were flooded with books, radio dramas, and motion pictures featuring heroic war heroes.
It was no coincidence.
One of the people who understood this was Charles Lindbergh Jr., who, in September 1941, delivered a brilliant speech about what the elitists had been doing:
Those of us who choose to investigate what takes place behind the scenes in the political arena and then attempt to bring that information to the public are often labeled fools, lunatics, or imaginative conspiracy theorists. Personally, I rarely use the word conspiracy, except when quoting others, and for three reasons:
1. The elite usually talk about what they are planning, either in their own books, documents, or other publications. (Sometimes this is also done through symbolic language, but that is too advanced a topic to explore here.) Therefore, when discussing what the elite are planning or doing, the term conspiracy is often only partially accurate.
2. The word conspiracy is highly charged and demonized, and is commonly used to marginalize, ridicule, and silence those who are open-minded enough to question the worldview we have been fed since childhood.
3. I am interested in FACTS, not theories about what has happened and continues to happen behind our backs. Therefore, I choose primarily to write about things that can be proven. Those with the courage and patience to investigate the matter thoroughly will discover that what I present in my articles is neither new nor fanciful. Rather, it is information uncovered by brilliant men and women who devoted their lives to finding the truth instead of merely swallowing the Hollywood version that we are usually shown on television or read about in our newspapers.
During a Senate hearing in 1912 concerning privileges and elections, a letter written by Rockefeller’s agent in Congress, Joseph Sibley, to John D. Archbold of Rockefeller’s Standard Oil was presented. In the letter, Sibley wrote, among other things:
”What is needed is an effective literary bureau, not for a day or a crisis, but for the continuous supervision of the press and other similar channels. It will cost money, but it will be the cheapest solution in the long run.”
As early as 1853, John Swinton, editor of the New York Times, was invited to give a speech at the New York Press Club. It was probably fortunate that no one saw the speech in advance, because this is what he said:
”There is no such thing in America as an independent press, unless it is in the country towns. You know it and I know it. Not one of you dares to express an honest opinion. If you expressed it, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid one hundred and fifty dollars a week to keep my honest opinions out of the newspaper for which I write. You are paid similar salaries for similar services. If I allowed one issue of my paper to contain an honest opinion, I would, like Othello, lose my occupation in less than twenty-four hours.
The man who would be foolish enough to write his honest opinions would soon find himself out on the street looking for another job. It is the duty of the New York journalist to lie, to distort, to vilify, to fawn before Mammon, and to betray his country and his people for his daily bread—or, what amounts to the same thing, his salary. We are the tools and vassals of wealthy men behind the scenes. We are marionettes. These men pull the strings, and we dance. Our time, our talents, our lives, our abilities are entirely the property of these men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”
Only a few years ago, three-quarters of the shareholders holding controlling interests in the major television networks ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN were the banks Morgan Guaranty Trust, Bank of America, Citibank, and Chase Manhattan Bank. Ten corporations controlled 59 magazines, 58 daily newspapers, and several film studios. This meant that the owners of Time, Newsweek, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Wall Street Journal, among others, were members of the banking elite.
So where does one find information like this? In tabloids? In history books? In fairy tales?
No. Information of this kind can be found, among other places, in Patrick S. J. Carmack’s highly revealing book The Money Changers.
And who is Patrick S. J. Carmack?
Patrick S. J. Carmack is a judge with the Corporation Commission of the State of Oklahoma and a member of the Supreme Court of the United States. If some people find my credibility lacking, perhaps they will place more trust in him.
Här ska vi nu titta lite närmare på några av elitens främsta propagandister:
H. G. Wells
The author of, among other works, The War of the Worlds (which the elite in the United States allegedly used for a mass experiment via a 1938 radio broadcast in which commercials were omitted so that people would believe it was real) was a frontman for the British government and also belonged to the Secret Service. He predicted, almost to the exact year, when the Second World War would begin in his book The Shape of Things to Come (1933). Wells was one of the founders of the Fabian Society, a left-wing organization in which Sidney and Beatrice Webb—the key figures behind the association—advocated for a world government ruled by a super-elite of technocrats, with the public having no say in the matter.
In The Open Conspiracy, he promoted the idea of a world government. Officially, Wells was a champion of the weak, but in reality he was one of the elite’s propagandists who, through his works, programmed the agenda of those in power into people’s minds without them even realizing it.
[Source]
Charles Galton Darwin
A physicist and grandson of Charles Darwin who, in his book The Next Million Years, wrote:
”We are misguidedly trying to help people maintain their health, which increases the population. Instead, we must introduce specific diseases to help reduce population growth in a way that people would never suspect.”
In other words, it would be done through laboratories.
Darwin also wrote:
”Life in crowded urban environments has many unattractive aspects, but in the long run these can be overcome, not so much by changing the environments as by changing people so that they come to like them.”
In the same book, he also wrote about how the elite are creating a new form of slavery and that a more unified world would make it easier to establish a world government.
[Source]
Bertrand Russell
In the early 1950s, one of the elite’s major stars, Bertrand Russell (who was officially regarded as a great humanist but was, in reality, a propagandist for the elite), wrote the following in his book The Impact of Science on Society:
”Scientific societies are still in their infancy. It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much greater control over individual thought than even totalitarian states possess today.
Diet and injections, combined from a very early age, will produce the kind of character and beliefs that those in power find desirable, and all serious criticism of the authorities will become psychologically impossible.
Gradually, through selective breeding, the differences between the rulers and the ruled will increase until they are almost separate species. A revolt of the masses will be as unthinkable as an organized attack by sheep protesting the eating of mutton.”
He also wrote:
”After all, the most civilized and semi-civilized countries throughout history have had a large class of slaves or serfs completely subordinate to their masters. There is nothing in human nature that makes such a system impossible to maintain. And the whole development of scientific technique has made it easier than it used to be to maintain despotic power by a minority.”
[Source]
Aldous Huxley
Yet another of the elite’s famous propagandists. He wrote Brave New World, a novel about a future totalitarian society, and delivered a speech at the University of Berkeley in 1962 that should send chills down the spine of anyone who understands the implications of what he was saying:
”A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which an all-powerful political leadership and its armies of bureaucrats control a population of slaves who do not need to be coerced because they love their servitude. A kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, where people have their freedoms taken away from them and even come to enjoy it, thanks to brainwashing achieved through medical means.”
Henry Kissinger
Carl Bildt’s great role model is a notoriously unscrupulous figure who has worked tirelessly for nearly 50 years to serve the interests of the elite and advance their agenda, regardless of the cost. He was one of the architects behind the United States’ slaughter in Vietnam, the installation of Pinochet in Chile, and countless other dirty operations. He is a member of some of the world’s most powerful organizations: the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), and the Trilateral Commission.
Among other things, he has said:
”Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as tools in foreign policy.”
[Source]
Zbigniew Brzezinski
A political scientist, geostrategist, statesman, member of the CFR, the Bilderberg Group, and the Trilateral Commission, as well as an adviser to seven U.S. presidents. In the book Between Two Ages, he writes that:
”National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept.”
In the same book, he states:
”The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values such as freedom. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date files containing even the most personal information about the individual.”
Michael Delavante, The Elite’s Propagandists
