Prominent royals, politicians, and individuals in the banking and business sectors talk about the Earth’s population as a major threat. At the same time, they hold annual meetings without democratic transparency. A disturbing and dangerous combination.
The question of depopulation is unpleasant but necessary. We must not shy away from it. If humans can cause harm on a small scale, they can do so on a larger one with power. Just look at what Hitler managed to achieve.
The lack of transparency in the corridors of power is a significant problem. The conclusions of powerful individuals have unsettling undertones as their worldview is rooted in an extremely rational mindset. They can entertain any sick ideas without our knowledge.
The man behind the Gaia theory, James Lovelock, expresses his approval of ”removing” people. What does he mean? Would he welcome a pandemic or a world war?
Lovelock has led us to see the Earth as a living organism. He probably means well but does not realize the evil that comes with a rational thinking that sees humans and nature in terms of a purely mechanical materialistic creation.
It is such thinking that is behind the failure of GMO, the likely ongoing geoengineering that is destroying our nature when the idea is that it should help (or not), vaccines and harmful side effects, an expensive healthcare system that treats symptoms instead of causes for a much cheaper cost, and so on.
The same mindset believes that nature is so foolish that formula can replace breastfeeding or that water should be privatized, as Nestle’s chairman Peter Brabeck has said.
British Prince Philip sees humans as a plague on Earth and says, when asked what should be done, ’can’t you guess?’ In 1988, he stated the following:
In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation
He speaks innocently about family planning but may very well refer to something else if he sees it as such a great threat. We do not know because we lack transparency. The statement about returning as a deadly virus reveals a driving thought that has been present for a long time.
Henry Kissinger is behind a well-known secret memo from 1974 about this very ”threat.” A key figure in annual secret meetings among an elite group of people, of which Bilderberg is one such meeting format.
Recently, Obama appointed Ron Klain as responsible for the Ebola issue. He sees overpopulation as the big issue, the big threat. A directly unhealthy attitude given his task.
John P. Holdren, the president’s science advisor, is another who sees the population as a threat. The title of his book ”Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment” from 1977 speaks volumes.
Ted Turner, creator of CNN, says the same thing. A well-known advocate, Professor Paul Ehrlich, is on the same track or is even a voice that Ted Turner and many others have listened to.
Bill Gates has a formula that can calculate how dangerous we are: CO2 = P x S x E x C presented during a speech at TED 2010. P stands for ”People,” S for ”Services per person,” E for ”Energy per person,” and C for ”CO2 per unit energy.”
He does say that his great desire is to solve the energy issue through innovation and thus solve the equation. But he calls it a miracle. In other words, something that is difficult to solve now. Then P remains. According to Gates, it must be reduced.
I may be misinterpreting him, but it is a fully logical conclusion according to his own formula. Considering the diseases and death resulting from the world’s vaccination policy, the problems caused by GMO, two things Gates supports, there is an obvious risk that there is a dark agenda behind it.
His father, William H. Gates Sr., was the leader of ”Planned Parenthood,” formerly known as the ”American Eugenics Society,” an organization for eugenics that explicitly stated that most people are ”reckless breeders” and ”human weeds.
The report from Truthseeker on RT about Bill Gates and his likely agenda is something that should concern every Swede and Swedish politician. But no. He appears on SVT’s Skavlan as if he were almighty himself when in reality, it’s like inviting Hitler in disguise.
The thoughts about eugenics or racial hygiene have been around for a long time. A belief in the rational human’s supremacy over nature. The same ideas were behind Nazism. Now, they have taken a different form.
Seeing the population as a major problem is probably mostly a myth. The problem is our way of living. We do not live in harmony with nature and creation. By that, I do not mean that we should stop breathing and live in a box, stop living. Just like the creator, I love design and aesthetics. We don’t have to give that up.
Humans are currently a plague on Mother Earth, but the number of people is not the problem. It’s our values, our behavior, and our societal system that erode.
We can change this to be in harmony with Mother Earth and still live well, but not in excess. There are solutions for free energy that magically break the dependence on oil and coal. We can find materials that are in harmony with the earth. And so on.
However, the resistance among the elite is significant because these technical solutions, along with deeper values and a changed societal system, such as a new monetary system, threaten their monopoly on power.
So, is depopulation a driving political idea? I think so. There is a formula that solves the problem. To create a whole world, the power (M) for the elite must be 0%, and transparency (T) must be 100 %.
palbergstrom.com, Is depopulation a driving political idea?
